Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Victoria Griffin
- Postcode verified
SN9 5EW
- Name on report verified
Pewsey Vale School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 26 June
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 26 June 2024 on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. p.1
- The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections. p.1
- The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. p.1
- It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection. p.1
- During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. p.1
- We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. p.1
- I also reviewed school improvement documents, visited lessons, completed work scrutiny and met with your special educational needs coordinator, groups of pupils and teachers. p.1
- I have considered all this in coming to my judgement. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment4
“Neil Pritchard Headteacher Pewsey Vale School Wilcot Road Pewsey Wiltshire SN9 5EW” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 589
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Neil Pritchard Headteacher Pewsey Vale School Wilcot Road Pewsey Wiltshire SN9 5EW
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Pewsey Vale School
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 26 June 2024 on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Pewsey Vale School
The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Pewsey Vale School
During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also reviewed school improvement documents, visited lessons, completed work scrutiny and met with your special educational needs coordinator, groups of pupils and teachers. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
necessary for the school to become good.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
The school should take further action to:
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
ensure that all staff have high expectations of pupils’ work and behaviour ensure that all staff are implementing the curriculum consistently well.
p.1
Main findings
Since the previous inspection, the school has addressed each of the areas of improvement set out in the report. In addition to this, the school has begun to make arrangements to join a multi-academy trust.
p.2
Main findings
The school’s actions have included the introduction of ‘preferred pedagogies’ to help pupils know and remember more. You have also made significant changes to the ways in which you use assessment. These actions are starting to have a positive impact on the quality of education pupils receive. However, these changes are not being implemented consistently, so pupils’ learning remains variable. You have also ensured that struggling readers are more accurately identified and receive appropriate support. This work has had a positive impact. More work needs to be done to ensure that teachers know about the individual needs of all pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) so that they adapt learning appropriately.
p.2
Main findings
You have commissioned an external review of governance. Governors are becoming more skilled at challenging leaders and holding them to account, particularly in relation to pupil outcomes. You have made changes to the way you quality-assure your work. Quality assurance and self-evaluation are now more systematic and, most of the time, more accurate. You have also developed middle leaders’ ability to drive improvements in their curriculum areas.
p.2
Main findings
While most pupils have positive attitudes towards school, the expectations of them are not consistently high. This impacts the work they produce and, at times, their behaviour. Relationships between staff and pupils remain a strength of the school.
p.2
Main findings
Following the previous inspection, when the school was judged as requires improvement, the Department for Education’s regional director requested that you engage with a range of external partners. These partners, including two multi-academy trusts, have supported you with much of the work outlined above. Leaders have been open and reflective during this process. Your work with one multi-academy trust is ongoing.
p.2
Main findings
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of governors, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Wiltshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion