Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Dixons Middleton Academy

Inspected 26 Jun 2024 · published 10 Sept 2024 · URN 143319

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sally Rix (lead), Derek Yarwood, Scott Maclean

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Jun 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Derek Yarwood, Sally Rix, Scott Maclean

  • Postcode verified

    M24 2GT

  • Name on report verified

    Middleton Technology School

  • URN verified

    143319

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+25Mostly positivemore positive than 20% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyenjoyambitiousstronghigh-qualityhappysuccessful
Criticismgapslackstruggleseriousinconsistenciesconcernslowlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1286w+23
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,289
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
30%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Middleton Technology School Kenyon Lane, Middleton, Manchester M24 2GT

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school's overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The school's next inspection will be a graded inspection.

p.1

Outcome

The principal of this school is Janine Kellett. This school is part of Great Academies Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Brendan Loughran, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Paul Jones.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

A feeling of belonging helps most pupils to feel happy in school. Pupils value the friendships that they forge with each other. They said that the large size of the school helps them to meet other pupils with similar interests. For example, during breaktimes, some pupils enjoy playing football together, while others socialise in the school’s relaxing spaces.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Typically, the atmosphere in the school is calm and orderly. Most pupils are attentive to their teachers during lessons. However, some pupils lack the motivation that they need to be successful in their learning.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils benefit from opportunities to develop different talents and hobbies. For instance, some pupils participate in the school’s annual performance or in sports competitions. Others enjoy the electives programme, which provides pupils with the opportunity to explore subjects in more depth.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has high aspirations for pupils, including for those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Supported by the trust, the school is taking effective action to address some of the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, such as pupils’ low rates of attendance. The school is also strengthening its curriculum offer. However, there is much more to be done to ensure that staff deliver the curriculum consistently well. Some pupils do not achieve as well as they should. 25 and 26 June 2024

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The curriculum is suitably ambitious for pupils, including for those with SEND. The school has identified the important knowledge that pupils should learn and the order in which this should happen.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Most teachers have strong knowledge of the subjects that they teach. They explain new concepts clearly to pupils. However, some teachers’ understanding of how to deliver the curriculum effectively is underdeveloped. For example, at times, learning activities do not support pupils to learn the intended curriculum well. Some teachers identify and remedy gaps in pupils’ knowledge effectively. However, other teachers do not check carefully that pupils have learned what they intended before moving on. As a result, some pupils develop gaps in their subject knowledge.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school accurately identifies pupils with SEND. Typically, it provides staff with useful information about the additional needs of these pupils. Most staff make appropriate use of this information. However, where there are inconsistencies in curriculum delivery, these hinder some pupils with SEND from achieving as well as they could. Although the school is taking appropriate action to ensure that the needs of all pupils with SEND are being met, there is further work needed to check that these actions are effective.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school knows that reading is a barrier to learning for many pupils. However, its approach to supporting these pupils is underdeveloped, particularly in key stage 4. The school identifies pupils who need further help with their reading. Some of these pupils benefit from expert support to develop their confidence and fluency in reading. However, the support that is given to other pupils is not sharply focused on the gaps in their reading knowledge. The school does not check well enough whether this support is working as intended. Consequently, some pupils do not get the help that they need to read well.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Most pupils behave according to the school’s rules. Typically, they are courteous and respectful. A minority of pupils struggle to regulate their own conduct. The school is successfully tackling this, for instance the number of pupils truanting within school has rapidly reduced.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Recently, the school has ensured that all staff take a role in raising attendance. Although some groups of pupils do not attend as frequently as they should, the school’s approach to addressing this is beginning to take effect.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school provides a suitable programme of personal development. Pupils learn important information in ‘life education’ lessons and assemblies, such as the difference between healthy and unhealthy relationships. Pupils receive careers guidance that helps them to make informed choices about their next steps when they leave school.

p.2

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Trustees and governors are committed to improving the school. They have an accurate understanding of what should be done to ensure that pupils benefit from a high-quality education. Most staff are positive about the way that the school considers their workload. They particularly appreciate the school’s sharply focused approach to training. 25 and 26 June 2024

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some teachers lack the pedagogical understanding needed to implement the curriculum well. This means that some pupils do not build a secure understanding in a number of subjects. The school should provide teachers with the training and guidance that they need to deliver the curriculum effectively.  Some teachers do not check that pupils have understood their learning before moving on. As a result, some pupils develop gaps in their knowledge that are not addressed. The school should ensure that teachers use effective assessment strategies to identify and remedy gaps in pupils’ knowledge.  The school’s approach to supporting pupils who struggle to read is underdeveloped, particularly in key stage 4. This means that some pupils do not receive the help that they need in a timely and effective way, which hinders their learning. The school should ensure that appropriate support is in place, and carefully monitored, for these pupils,

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

so that they learn to read confidently and fluently.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in March 2019.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 25 and 26 June 2024

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 25 and 26 June 2024

p.4

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,350

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 5 and 6 March 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of Great Academies Education Trust.  The school uses one registered and six unregistered alternative providers for a small number of pupils.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors spoke with the principal, other school leaders and staff. 25 and 26 June 2024

p.5

6

 Inspectors spoke with representatives of the trust and of the local governing body.  An inspector spoke with a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, art and design, design and technology, and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. An inspector also spoke with leaders about the curriculum in some other subjects.  Inspectors spoke with pupils about their experiences of school and their views on behaviour and bullying. Inspectors also observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at breaktimes.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered

p.6

6

the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors considered the responses shared through Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. They also considered the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for pupils and for staff.  The inspectors reviewed a wide range of evidence, including minutes of trust board meetings and the school’s self-evaluation documents.

p.6

Inspection team

Sally Rix, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Derek Yarwood Ofsted Inspector 25 and 26 June 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion