Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Castle Wood Special School

Inspected 3 Jul 2024 · published 9 Sept 2024 · URN 135569

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Anna Vrahimi (lead), Pete Hines OBE

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Jul 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Anna Vrahimi, Pete Hines OBE

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CV2 1FN

  • Name on report verified

    Castle Wood Special School

  • URN verified

    135569

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+16Mostly positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisewell supportedhappyrigorouspositivepreciseeffectiveconsistentlyambitious
Criticismnot alwaysnot consistentlynot ambitiousvariableweaknessesinconsistentnot clearunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1226w+14
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve32w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,227
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Castle Wood Special School 50 Deedmore Road, Coventry, West Midlands CV2 1FN

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Outstanding 2 and 3 July 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are well cared for and happy at Castle Wood Special School. All staff know pupils well. Pupils, parents and carers are made to feel welcome. Consequently, pupils settle quickly when they arrive at the school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The curriculum sets out to support the broad and complex range of needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Pupils with multiple and complex learning needs work at the early stages of the curriculum. Staff focus on small steps of learning to support areas, such as physical development, shared attention and vocalisation. However, in other parts of the curriculum teachers are not clear about what to teach and when. This slows down learning, particularly for pupils who are ready and capable of moving on to more rigorous and demanding work. Consequently, the expectations for some pupils are not always high enough.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe in school. They can name adults who will help them. Pupils learn about positive friendships. Any unkind behaviour is dealt with sensitively by staff. Pupils who may need additional support for their behaviour are well supported.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils experience a range of broader opportunities, including visits to theatres and residential visits. This builds pupils’ confidence and independence.

p.2

better?

The curriculum offers a broad range of subject areas. In some parts of the curriculum, such as physical development, the precise knowledge and skills the school wants pupils to learn are clearly identified. Teachers know exactly what essential knowledge they should teach and in what order. Pupils build on their prior knowledge and skills in a logical way. As a result, in these parts of the curriculum, pupils achieve well across the school. However, in many other parts of the curriculum this is not the case. In subjects such as mathematics and science, for instance, the precise knowledge the school wants pupils to know is not clearly defined or ambitious enough. For some pupils, this limits their achievement.

p.2

better?

Staff have a secure understanding of the barriers pupils may have to learning. These include sensory, behavioural and communication needs. The school engages well with external agencies, such as occupational therapists, to quickly put in place support for pupils. As a result, the complex range of needs of pupils are mostly well supported.

p.2

better?

The school has ambitious plans to support pupils’ communication needs. These include whole school approaches, such as signing, communication boards and symbols. In addition, staff establish suitable communication aids for individual pupils early on. However, these ambitions are not fully realised. The agreed strategies for supporting pupils’ communication are not consistently implemented by all staff. This means, that some pupils are not able to always communicate their thoughts well enough throughout the day. 2 and 3 July 2024

p.2

3

Pupils at the very early stages of reading are supported well by staff. They ensure that pupils learn the essential pre-reading skills, such as developing an awareness of sounds and print. Consequently, an increased number of pupils are ready to move on to the school’s formal phonics programme. However, the teaching of phonics is variable between classrooms. As a result, for some pupils, this slows down their learning.

p.3

3

Children in the early years are well supported to start school. Staff work closely with parents and previous settings to understand their children’s needs and motivations for learning. However, the curriculum is not planned and sequenced sufficiently well enough to prepare children for future learning as they move through the school. This means pupils are not always experiencing ambitious learning opportunities.

p.3

3

Pupils are mostly calm in class and around school. Staff use various supportive strategies to effectively help pupils when they become anxious. Consequently, pupils are happy to engage in lessons and learning activities.

p.3

3

The curriculum for personal development is a strength of the school. Pupils experience activities which go beyond the academic. For example, visitors to the school include artists and local political figures. Pupils visit and compare different types of parks. They know about difference and welcome visitors to their school. All this contributes to pupils’ understanding of the world around them.

p.3

3

The school, including governors, does not always have an accurate view across school of what areas are working well and what areas are not. At times, they do not evaluate with precision the areas which need improvement. For example, the school does not have a strategic oversight of improving the attendance of pupils who do not attend school regularly enough. All this means the school’s actions do not always lead to necessary improvements in different areas of their work quickly enough.

p.3

3

Most parents are positive about the school. They comment on how well staff know their children and how well they care for them.

p.3

3

Staff feel well supported. In particular, they feel their workload and well-being are well considered.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In parts of the curriculum, learning is not planned and sequenced sufficiently well enough to prepare pupils for future learning. The precise knowledge and skills the 2 and 3 July 2024

p.3

4

school wants pupils to learn are not clearly defined in some subject areas. This means teachers are unclear about what to teach and when. This slows down learning, particularly for pupils who are ready and capable of moving on to more rigorous and demanding work. The school should ensure that the curriculum identifies precisely what knowledge and skills pupils should learn over time, so that all pupils can build on their knowledge accurately, successfully.  The school has not ensured that staff consistently implement the agreed communication strategies in their classrooms. This means that some pupils are not able to consistently communicate their thoughts well enough throughout the day. The school should ensure the intended communication strategies are implemented consistently in all classrooms.  The delivery of the phonics programme is inconsistent across school. This means that pupils experience variable approaches to the teaching of phonics in different

p.4

4

classrooms. As a result, not all pupils build their phonic knowledge in a consistent way or as well as they are capable of doing. The school should ensure that all staff have the knowledge and skills to be able to deliver the phonics programme accurately and consistently.  The school does not always have an accurate view of strengths and weaknesses within its provision. This means their actions do not always lead to necessary improvements. The school should ensure precise and effective approaches accurately evaluate different areas of their work across school.

p.4

How can I feedback my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feedback my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 2 and 3 July 2024

p.4

School details

Chair of governing body Margaret Chapman

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 6 February 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 All pupils have an education, health and care plan. These support a broad range of needs, including autism sensory condition, speech language and communication needs, severe learning difficulties and profound and multiple learning disabilities. Pupils also have physical, medical and sensory needs.  There were no nursery-age children on roll during the inspection.  The school use one unregistered alternative provider.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a graded (section 5) inspection under the same Act.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 2 and 3 July 2024

p.5

6

◼ This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. ◼ The inspectors met with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, assistant headteachers, chair of governors, an additional representative from the governing board, subject leaders, teachers and pupils. They also talked informally with transport assistants, drivers and staff. ◼ The lead inspector spoke with a school improvement representative from the local authority. ◼ Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, communication and language, and mathematics and problem-solving. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector also looked at additional subjects, including physical

p.6

6

development and enquiry and investigation. ◼ The lead inspector observed pupils reading to a familiar adult. ◼ To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. ◼ Inspectors considered responses to the online questionnaire for parents, Ofsted Parent View. This included free-text comments. Inspectors also looked at responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey. ◼ Inspectors looked at a range of documentation provided by the school. This included the school’s self-evaluation, school policies, curriculum documents and SEND records.

p.6

Inspection team

Anna Vrahimi, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Pete Hines OBE Ofsted Inspector 2 and 3 July 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion