Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Oscott Manor School

Inspected 12 Jun 2024 · published 9 Sept 2024 · URN 103628

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Jun 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Claire Price, Mark Howes, Pete Hines OBE

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    B23 6DE

  • Name on report verified

    Oscott Manor School

  • URN verified

    103628

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−1Mixedmore positive than 81% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiouseffectivesafemake good progresswell-sequencedclearpositiveenjoy
Criticismpoorlylacknot sufficientlynot robustnot ambitiousnot well plannedtoo manydecline

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1330w−4
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,301
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 53
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of Oscott Manor School 290 Reservoir Road, Erdington, Birmingham, West Midlands B23 6DE

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Sixth-form provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 11 and 12 June 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils come to school happily. They have positive relationships with staff. Students in the sixth form particularly enjoy the quiet and calm environment and the help that they get from teachers to prepare them for the future.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school’s expectations of pupils are not high enough. They do not benefit from a sufficiently ambitious curriculum. While the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are identified and shared, these needs are not put at the heart of pupils’ provision and, as a result, pupils do not make the progress that they should.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are not prepared well enough for adulthood. They do not learn how to keep safe or how to manage their behaviour and emotions well enough. Many pupils disengage from their learning and staff do not make sure that they are re-directed or re-engaged. This hampers their progress. Too many pupils are outside of classrooms, struggling to manage their feelings. This disturbs their learning and that of other pupils.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Outdoor spaces are poorly designed. In social times, most pupils wander aimlessly with no activities or resources to support their social and emotional development. There are few opportunities for pupils to develop their curiosity or to follow their talents and interests.

p.2

better?

Leaders are committed to improving the school. However, the school has not demonstrated the capacity, skills or knowledge to make the changes needed. Those responsible for governance have not provided the focused support the school needs. As a result, the school has continued to decline. Pupils do not experience the quality of education that they should do to make good progress.

p.2

better?

The school has not ensured that all staff understand the precise SEND needs of the pupils that they teach. As a result, some of the provision that should be in place for pupils is not provided. Communication is poorly promoted. Pupils who need to use communication tools, such as Makaton, picture exchange or symbols, do not do so. Staff lack the expertise to meet pupils’ communication needs. Because of this, some pupils are not able to express their wants and needs.

p.2

better?

The curriculum does not meet the needs of pupils. Although the school has begun work on the curriculum for pupils with the most complex needs, it has not made sure that it is sufficiently focused on pupils’ SEND needs. Staff are not sufficiently skilled in delivering this curriculum. Pupils studying the subject-specific curriculum do not benefit from a coherent, well-sequenced curriculum. As a result, pupils experience disconnected lessons that do not build on their learning over time. Pupils are not being prepared well enough for their next steps. 11 and 12 June 2024

p.2

3

The school has a phonics programme in place to make sure that all pupils can learn to read well. However, it has not made sure that staff are trained to deliver the programme. Pupils who are pre-verbal do not participate fully in the phonics curriculum. As a result, pupils do not learn to read fluently as quickly as they could. Some pupils do not have the opportunity to use phonics to support their reading at all.

p.3

3

Pupils do not benefit from an adequate personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum. The curriculum for pupils in the formal pathways is very new. It does not cover all the important topics that pupils need to keep themselves safe and to be prepared for adulthood. Pupils with more complex needs do not learn how to understand and communicate choices or to ask for help. Activities designed to promote independence are not well considered. Pupils are not taught how to keep safe.

p.3

3

Students in the sixth form are better prepared for adulthood. They learn about the world of work through carefully considered vocational placements and are taught about different careers.

p.3

3

Pupils are not supported well enough to manage their behaviours. There are few clear routines used in lessons to support behaviour and there are no clear communication strategies used to reinforce staff expectations. This means that pupils are left struggling to make sense of their day with little guided support. The school has not made sure that staff record pupils’ behaviour systematically. This hampers the school’s ability to analyse patterns and trends in behaviour and means that pupils do not get the right support quickly enough.

p.3

3

Attendance is well managed. The school follows up on absence tenaciously and, as a result, pupils attend well.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Staff do not know the precise needs of the pupils that they teach. As a result, they do not plan the small steps needed to make sure that pupils make progress in learning or in reaching their education, health and care plan outcomes. The school should make sure that all staff know the precise needs of pupils and use this information to inform their educational provision.  Pupils are not supported well enough to develop effective communication using the range of strategies identified by the school. This means that some pupils are not able to communicate their wants and needs, and others are not able to 11 and 12 June 2024

p.3

4

communicate well enough. The school should devise clear plans to develop pupils’ communication and ensure that all staff have the necessary skills and knowledge to deliver this and to ensure that all pupils can communicate effectively.  Staff recording of pupils’ behaviour is not robust or rigorous enough. This means that the school cannot identify patterns of pupils’ behaviours that may exist or put in place the appropriate support or interventions. The school should establish clear expectations for recording behaviours, monitor the recording of this information and use this information to provide the right support for pupils.  The curriculum for pupils with the most complex needs does not meet their needs. This means that pupils are not prepared well enough for their next steps. The school should review the curriculum to make sure that it meets the needs of pupils and ensure that all staff have the necessary information and training to

p.4

4

implement the curriculum well.  The subject-specific curriculum in most subject areas is not ambitious enough. It is not well planned and sequenced. This means that pupils do not build their learning towards appropriate endpoints. The school should make sure that the subject-specific curriculum identifies the important knowledge that pupils need to learn and is built towards suitably ambitious endpoints.  Staff have not been trained to deliver the phonics programme. This means that pupils do not learn to read as well as they could. The school should make sure that all staff are trained to deliver the phonics curriculum well.

p.4

4

The school may not appoint early career teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at 11 and 12 June 2024

p.4

5

any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 11 and 12 June 2024

p.5

sixth form

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

sixth form

Dates of previous inspection 6 and 7 December 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 All pupils at the school have an education, health and care plan. The primary need of pupils is autism.  The headteacher took up his post in April 2023.  The school operates on two sites. The sixth-form provision is at Ryland Road, Erdington, Birmingham B24 8JJ.  The school uses no alternative provision.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement with approved technical qualifications and apprenticeships. 11 and 12 June 2024

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.7

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, reading, communication, PSHE and science. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors met with the headteacher and other senior leaders.  Inspectors held meetings with other staff.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors reviewed school documentation.  Inspectors met with representatives of governors, including the chair of the governing body.  Inspectors spoke with pupils at social times and in formal meetings. There were no responses to the online pupil survey.  Inspectors met with staff and took account of the online staff survey.  Inspectors reviewed Ofsted Parent View.

p.7

Inspection team

Claire Price, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Mark Howes His Majesty’s Inspector 11 and 12 June 2024

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion