Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Holbrook Academy

Inspected 27 Jun 2024 · published 9 Sept 2024 · URN 137208

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Liz Smith (lead), Polly Lankester

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Jun 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Liz Smith, Polly Lankester

  • Postcode verified

    IP9 2QX

  • Name on report verified

    Holbrook Academy

  • URN verified

    137208

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−17Mixedmore positive than 7% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveenjoyeffectivelyimprovingstrengthseffectiveconsistentlykeen
Criticismdisruptweaknessesseriousconcerninsufficientlyconcernssuspensionstoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1387w−20
  • Safeguarding165w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,548
longer than usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 8%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Holbrook Academy Ipswich Road, Holbrook, Ipswich, Suffolk IP9 2QX

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school's overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The school's next inspection will be a graded inspection. The acting headteacher of this school is George Anstee-Parry. This school is a single academy trust which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Helen Butler.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils have a mixed experience of school. They enjoy seeing their friends, socialising and going on school trips. They benefit from a curriculum which also celebrates the local maritime industry. This includes work experience, employer talks and opportunities to go sailing. However, in their words, some lessons are ‘stressful’ for pupils. This is when pupils do not behave as they should. Too much talk and not enough focus on the task at hand frustrates pupils who want to learn. The turnover of staff has not helped with this. For some classes, routines of the classroom are taking time to embed.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

At social times, pupils mingle well. They like playing football, taking part in clubs, and competing over a game of mahjong. There are several opportunities to develop leadership skills and to demonstrate the school’s values. For example, pupils are keen fundraisers for an orphanage in Uganda. Pupils are excited to go on the trip to Tanzania to do voluntary work this summer.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive one-to-one support from dedicated staff at The Mayhew Centre. Like their peers, they benefit from several digital platforms to support their learning.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has been through a challenging period. There have been several headteachers over a short space of time. Numerous long-term serving staff left taking ‘institutional memory’ with them. While staffing is stabilising, many are getting to grips with new curriculums and procedures. 26 and 27 June 2024

p.1

2

In subjects that are well-established, pupils typically learn well. This is because teachers teach a carefully considered curriculum. Pupils are clear about the key knowledge they need to know. They retain important information because teachers provide opportunities to revisit their learning. Teachers check what pupils know and can do. They make sure that work is appropriately pitched for pupils’ abilities. In some subjects, the curriculum is in the process of review. The churn of staff means key initiatives for delivery of the curriculum have not stuck. For instance, the school provided training for the best ways of supporting reading in lessons prior to staff leaving. In some subject areas, the constant use of cover has led to a disconnected learning experience for pupils. This has also increased workload for some staff.

p.2

2

The reading culture at the school has waned. Pupils have got out of the habit of reading for pleasure. Pupils who need support with reading comprehension have bespoke programmes via the Student Success Centre (SSC). This has positive impact with pupils gaining confidence in understanding what they have read. As yet, there is not a phonics programme in place for those pupils who are learning to read.

p.2

2

The school has appropriate procedures for the identification and support of pupils with SEND. Teachers use pupils’ support plans to adjust their lessons so that pupils with SEND effectively learn the curriculum. Such strategies do not work so well when pupils disrupt learning. As a result, pupils with SEND have the same experience in lessons as their non- SEND peers.

p.2

2

The school is turning a corner with improving behaviour. Suspensions and the use of isolation is reducing. Movement around the site is calm. There is better support for pupils with complex behavioural needs. This is because there is more staffing in the pastoral support team. There is a new leadership structure with heads of year. These changes are having impact.

p.2

2

Pupils follow a comprehensive life skills curriculum, including careers. There are activities such as trips and guest speakers that are linked to the curriculum. Pupils also undertake activities week which provides wider experiences. The school’s lunchtime was extended to facilitate the running of clubs. However, the school does not have a clear view of the extent of the offer or the take up. An audit for this is underway.

p.2

2

Governors are asking the right questions and seeking appropriate support for the school so that it gets back on track. They, along with school leaders, clearly understand the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They visit regularly to see improvements first-hand. They have made sure that staff are looked after through well-being initiatives while there are greater demands.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

Safeguarding

While the school’s record-keeping is not as detailed as it should be, the school’s safeguarding team keep vulnerable pupils safe. They liaise with external agencies to 26 and 27 June 2024

p.2

3

ensure vulnerable pupils have the support they need. Sometimes, key information from conversations with pupils are not noted. Some communications with external agencies are kept in different places rather than on the pupils’ file on the central electronic recording system. However, the safeguarding team brief each other on cases in a weekly briefing.

p.3

3

Staff are alert to the signs of abuse. They know how to report a concern should they need to. Staff receive regular training and are up to date in their knowledge of the latest government guidance.

p.3

3

The trust ensures that the school employs staff after making the necessary pre- employment checks. They make regular checks to monitor the delivery of the school’s safeguarding policy. This includes commissioning external consultants to provide an audit of provision.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Pupils’ experience of learning the curriculum varies across the school. In some subject areas, the delivery of the curriculum works well. Where it does not work well, pupils have disconnected learning episodes. In some lessons this is due to cover where work may be repeated or insufficiently delivered. In others it is due to pupils’ misbehaviour. The school needs to provide further training focusing on improving staff’s delivery of the curriculum, so pupils engage with their learning and achieve well.  The development of a reading culture is in its infancy. Some pupils do not value the importance of reading and choose not to read. As yet, the school does not have a phonics programme in place to support those pupils who are learning to read. The school has an action plan to improve provision for reading and to run further training for staff. The school needs to implement its plan so that the reading culture is re-

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

energised and pupils value its importance.  While suspensions are reducing, they are too high. Too many pupils do not follow teachers’ instructions and disrupt lessons. This is particularly the case in key stage 3 where pupils talk too much, distract themselves and do not focus on the learning at hand. The school should continue its efforts to improve behaviour, ensuring staff follow the behaviour policy consistently and pupils develop positive learning behaviours.  The school’s procedures for sharing and recording information about safeguarding are not as robust as they should be. Sometimes, information about pupils’ welfare and communications with other professionals are held in different places or are not recorded in detail. The school needs to improve arrangements for noting, reporting and sharing information about pupils’ welfare and safety. 26 and 27 June 2024

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.4

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in October 2015.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 26 and 27 June 2024

p.4

School details

Date(s) of previous inspection 26 February 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The current senior leadership team is newly formed this year. Most have previously held positions of responsibility in the school. They have stepped up to undertake acting roles. A new substantive headteacher joins the school in September 2024.  The school is part of a single academy trust. There is a governing body which has delegated responsibility to oversee the school.  The school uses six alternative providers, four of which are unregistered.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.  At the time of the inspection Year 11 were on study leave. Half of Year 10 were out of school visiting post 16 providers for one day.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 26 and 27 June 2024

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The lead inspector met with the chair of the trust and representatives of the governing body.  Inspectors met with the acting headteacher, senior leaders, subject leaders and staff.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: design technology, history, mathematics and modern foreign languages. For each deep dive the inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The lead inspector also considered the provision for physical education (PE) and how the school supports pupils who are learning to read.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons, around school and at social times.

p.6

6

Inspectors considered pupils’ views about behaviour in school. They also spoke with staff about pupils’ behaviour and staff’s workload and well-being.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted’s pupil and staff surveys. They considered responses to Ofsted Parent View, including free-text comments. The lead inspector also spoke to a parent and read a letter.

p.6

Inspection team

Liz Smith, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Polly Lankester Ofsted Inspector 26 and 27 June 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion