Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St James Church of England Primary School, Handsworth

Inspected 10 Jul 2024 · published 9 Sept 2024 · URN 103401

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bianka Zemke

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Jul 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Bianka Zemke

  • Postcode verified

    B21 8NH

  • Name on report verified

    St James Church of England Primary School, Handsworth

  • URN verified

    103401

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongvery wellflourishenjoyexceptionallyvery effectivelovehappy
Criticismseriousdisruptionconcernslowerdelaysnot effectivebelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1113w+62
  • Safeguarding11w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,120
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
0
typical 4
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 1%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: St James Church of England Primary School, Handsworth Sandwell Road, Birmingham, West Midlands B21 8NH

p.1

Outcome

St James Church of England Primary School, Handsworth continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

St James sits firmly at the heart of its community. The school’s core value of love underpins everything that happens here. Most children join the school below the level expected for their age and/or have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). All adults have the highest expectations of every child and work as a team to give pupils the best possible start to education. As a result, children overcome many of their barriers, flourish and achieve well. This includes disadvantaged pupils.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well. They enjoy attending and are happy. Pupils are friendly, polite and welcoming. Lessons are generally free from disruption. Purposeful and positive relationships between staff and pupils are commonplace. Pupils know that their teachers care about them and will swiftly deal with any issues if they ever happen.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff pay serious attention to pupils’ personal development and provide wider opportunities. Pupils go on many exciting trips and visits and speak passionately about them. Furthermore, they learn about healthy relationships and different faiths. Pupils say that everyone is different but also equal. Pupils are very well prepared for life in modern British society.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has high aspirations for all pupils. These aspirations are driven through a well- designed and sequenced curriculum. The curriculum has been developed with pupils and the school’s context in mind. For instance, school leaders are aware that many pupils join with lower levels of development than is typical for their age, leading to barriers in their learning, such as speech and communication delays. Therefore, the curriculum is focused on language and encourages verbal communication. This approach is helping pupils catch up quickly. 9 and 10 July 2024

p.1

2

Staff have strong subject knowledge and present learning in a clear and logical way. This means that pupils grasp concepts quickly and build up their learning over time. Pupils make strong progress and leave the school achieving well. This is especially the case for disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND. Pupils are well prepared for their next steps in education.

p.2

2

Support for pupils with SEND is strong. Staff get to know children and their families exceptionally well. They understand any existing barriers and work effectively to provide the help the child and family needs. Leaders share clear information about pupils with staff so that they know how best to support them. Pupils receive targeted supported in lessons and intervention sessions. As a result, pupils with SEND flourish and do well.

p.2

2

Assessment is generally used well. Teachers quickly spot anyone who may need extra support in lessons and staff act swiftly to provide it. However, at times, staff are not so effective in spotting the pupils that have finished their work and are ready to learn new things. Often, these pupils are left waiting for the rest of the class to finish and this slows their learning.

p.2

2

The reading curriculum is very effective in ensuring that pupils gain the knowledge they need to become fluent readers. Pupils at the early stages of learning to read or those who have fallen behind are effectively supported. Pupils in all years enjoy daily reading time and class novels that foster a love of reading. Because of this work, most pupils read at a level appropriate for their age.

p.2

2

Children in Reception settle quickly and begin learning as soon as they arrive. Strong care and nurture ensure that children swiftly learn the routines of school life. Adults quickly build strong relationships. They model language and speech very well. Children are happy and well prepared for Year 1.

p.2

2

The school’s offer of wider opportunities is strong. Pupils have many varied and interesting opportunities to extend their learning beyond the classroom. All topics are linked to trips, visits and external speakers that are carefully chosen to reenforce the learning from lessons. There is a plethora of after-school clubs and activities that many pupils enjoy. In lessons, pupils learn about values such as respect, equality and personal safety, including online safety. All of this means that pupils are very well prepared for their next steps in life and education.

p.2

2

The school and governors have a strong understanding of the school’s strengths and what needs improvement. They work hard to improve continuously. Staff speak highly of the support they receive, including about their well-being and workload. Parents are complimentary about the school and say that their children are very well looked after.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 9 and 10 July 2024

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Sometimes, staff do not deepen or move on the learning of pupils when they are ready to learn new things. This slows pupils’ learning. The school should ensure that all staff have the knowledge and skills to adapt their teaching so that all pupils are consistently well supported in their learning.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in May 2019.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘ disadvantaged pupils ’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 9 and 10 July 2024

p.3

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 8 May 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 The school is a larger than average-size Church of England primary school.  The school runs daily breakfast and after-school clubs for its pupils.  The school does not use any alternative provision for its pupils.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspector met with the headteacher, deputy headteacher and other leaders. The inspector held a meeting with the governing body including the chair of governors. Meetings were held with curriculum leaders, teachers and support staff.  The inspector carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics and art. For each deep dive, the inspector discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked 9 and 10 July 2024

p.4

5

at samples of pupils’ work. The inspector visited the early years for each of the deep dives. The inspector considered the curriculum offer in other subjects.  The inspector listened to pupils read to a familiar adult.  The inspector observed pupils’ behaviour and interactions during lessons and at break and lunchtimes and spoke to many pupils during the inspection.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspector considered responses to the online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View. This included free-text comments. The inspector also reviewed responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey and responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey.

p.5

Inspection team

Bianka Zemke, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector 9 and 10 July 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion