Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Ardley Hill Academy

Inspected 17 Jul 2024 · published 9 Sept 2024 · URN 138209

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Jul 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Daniel Short, Emma Breckenridge, Wayne Jarvis

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    LU6 3NZ

  • Name on report verified

    Ardley Hill Academy

  • URN verified

    138209

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 12% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectivepositiveimprovedhigh-qualitywell-plannedeffectivelyclear
Criticismlackinconsistenciesweakernot consistentlystruggleslowyet tonot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1107w+31
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,086
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Inspection of Ardley Hill Academy Lowther Road, Dunstable, Bedfordshire LU6 3NZ

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The headteacher is Stephen Fox. This school is part of Chiltern Learning Trust, a multi-academy trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Adrian Rogers, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Graham Pryor. 16 and 17 July 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils endeavour to embody the school’s ‘REACH’ values: resilience, engagement, aspiration, communication, and health. They relish the five-step reward programme. It includes receiving a certificate at the ‘REACH’ assembly or sharing a pizza with the headteacher. Pupils and their families appreciate this approach. It boosts pupils’ happiness and sense of being a valued member of the school community.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There are increasing opportunities for pupils to be community minded. The ’safeguarding squad’, for example, look out for others. They let trusted adults know if a peer is unhappy or behaving inappropriately. There is also well-thought- through pastoral support. It helps vulnerable pupils express their wishes and feelings. Having peers and adults in school who want to help them, keeps pupils safe.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The curriculum is continuously being updated. The teaching of it helps pupils to develop a broad understanding across various subjects. For instance, by Year 1 in computing, pupils learn basic keyboard skills for formatting text. While, by Year 4 in history, they grasp concepts like 'civilisation' and 'invasion'. This approach focuses on improving pupils’ vocabulary and understanding of key ideas and skills. It prepares pupils more effectively for their next steps.

p.2

better?

Leaders have made significant efforts to rebuild the school’s relationship with parents and the local community. Many parents appreciate the ongoing improvements. The high turnout at the bonfire night event demonstrated strong support. It highlighted a new era of unity and the school’s commitment to bring people together.

p.2

better?

The school is currently refining its curriculum. The trust helps the school receive support from subject experts. They assist school-based leaders with developments. The school uses high-quality schemes of work. Leaders determine the most effective teaching and assessment methods. For instance, to ensure pupil success, staff first model the tasks. They then complete one together. This way, when pupils work independently, they know what to do.

p.2

better?

Pupils often excel in reading. This is because the school diligently implements its phonics and reading programmes. Leaders work with care to train staff. In the Nursery Year, many children can identify letter sounds, pointing to them on their sound charts. This strong foundation helps pupils to read and spell words accurately as they progress through key stage 1. Still, a few pupils struggle with fluent and expressive reading. Some staff lack the expertise to offer effective assistance. When staff ask pupils to re-read, they tend to repeat the same slow, monotonous reading. Leaders recognised this issue before the inspection. But the plan to address this is yet to take effect. 16 and 17 July 2024

p.2

3

There has been a recent increase in the proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The school is managing this well. There is early identification, monitoring and regular review of support plans involving parents and external agencies. Most parents appreciate these efforts. Leaders provide comprehensive staff training. This includes for pupils with more complex needs. There is clear evidence of pupil progress. For example, improvements in letter formation and sentence writing. But inconsistencies in staff support sometimes mean that some pupils with SEND do not progress as well as they might.

p.3

3

Pupils generally show calm and focused behaviour. They mirror the behaviour staff model and reinforce through praise and rewards. Minor behaviour issues sometimes arise. Leaders equip staff with strategies and resources to manage these incidents well. The school makes every effort to ensure regular attendance. Staff use the minibus to transport pupils, and interactions with the therapy dog, Hope, provide a positive start to the day. Regular attendance helps pupils understand school routines and keep up with lessons.

p.3

3

The school takes pride in its personal development programme. It has grown and improved since the last inspection. For instance, the trust facilitates opportunities for sports competitions and participation. The presence of a swimming pool on-site provides great benefit to pupils. Regular swimming lessons teach many essential skills for water safety and fitness. Additionally, well-planned educational trips add to learning experiences. For example, Year 2 recently visited a castle to expand their knowledge of monarchs. Moreover, there are frequent performance opportunities. These include performing in nearby auditoriums. These experiences help pupils improve their confidence, public speaking and display their creativity.

p.3

3

Governance, at both local and at trust level, provides a positive impact at the school. Rigorous safeguarding audits ensure tenacity in how the school supports vulnerable pupils. Networking opportunities provided by the trust have improved the curriculum and its teaching. Staff appreciate leaders' interpersonal skills and their ability to manage change well. This has created a positive working environment.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Although leaders have plans, the support provided is not effectively improving reading fluency and expression for the weaker readers, which affects their comprehension. The school should offer staff the necessary training to help these pupils read confidently and proficiently. 16 and 17 July 2024

p.3

4

 The school’s current approach to supporting pupils with SEND varies in its effectiveness. While some methods, such as clear explanations and demonstrations, help pupils showcase their knowledge, this level of support is not consistently applied across all pupils and subjects. The school should strengthen its strategies to ensure that all pupils with SEND receive the support they need to achieve their very best.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 16 and 17 July 2024

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 22 and 23 February 2022, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school offers nursery provision. Two-year-olds can attend a morning session, for 15 hours. For three-year-olds, the school offers both 15-hour and 30-hour weekly programmes.  The school has a specially resourced provision for pupils with a diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorder. The trust, in agreement with the local authority, will be closing this in July 2025. Currently, there are no pupils due to be on roll in the specially resourced provision in September 2024.  There is before- and after-school childcare for pupils who attend the school. The school runs this.  The school currently engages the services of two unregistered alternative providers of education.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 16 and 17 July 2024

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school's education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with trust leaders, including the CEO, deputy CEO, director of school improvement, director of SEND and safeguarding, director of the teaching school and one of the primary lead practitioners deployed to work in the school.  Inspectors held meetings with school leaders, including the headteacher, deputy headteacher, assistant headteachers, special educational needs and disabilities coordinator and three local governors.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, computing and history. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to staff, spoke to some pupils about

p.6

6

their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector also listened to a sample of pupils read to a familiar adult.  To further inspect the curriculum, inspectors explored provision in the early years, support for pupils with SEND and three other subjects: science, art and physical education.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors reviewed school documentation, including the school development plan, self-evaluation form, minutes from a meeting of the local governing body and a report of a quality assurance review.  Inspectors considered the responses to surveys. These included 60 responses to the staff survey, 87 responses to the pupil survey and 169 responses, including 98

p.6

6

free-text responses, to Ofsted Parent View. Inspectors also held separate discussions with pupils, parents and staff.

p.6

Inspection team

Daniel Short, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Wayne Jarvis Ofsted Inspector 16 and 17 July 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion