Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Phoenix Pre-School

Inspected 16 Jul 2024 · published 27 Aug 2024 · URN 507939

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

David Watkins

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Phoenix Pre-School Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP519745

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Jul 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    David Watkins

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PO9 4RY

  • Name on report verified

    Phoenix Pre-School

  • URN verified

    507939

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationGood

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−16Mixedmore positive than 75% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectivesafemake good progressconsistentlyenjoysuccessfullylove
Criticismweaknessesnot alwayscompromisedfailurenot metfailednot effectivenot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings758w−14
  • Safeguarding123w−21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
847
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 51
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
0
typical 1
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Safeguarding 9%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Inspection of Phoenix Pre-School Riders Infant School, Kingsclere Avenue, Havant, Hampshire PO9 4RY

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Arrangements to promote children's safety and welfare are not sufficiently secure. The provider does not ensure that senior staff in lead safeguarding roles have the information necessary to keep children safe. For instance, staff are not able to access information about unvetted committee members. In addition, adults whose suitability has not been checked are permitted unsupervised access to the building. Children's safety is further compromised by a failure to meet fire safety regulations.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Weaknesses in staff deployment mean that, on occasion, children outside are out of sight or hearing of an adult. As a result, staff are unable to consistently monitor the well-being of all children.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

There are good arrangements to promote children's learning and development. The provider's curriculum supports children's social and emotional progress well. Children enjoy their time at the setting. They are supported by passionate staff, who set clear expectations for their behaviour. Staff are positive role models, showing interest in children's activities, and offering words of encouragement and reassurance. Staff work well to improve children's self-esteem, helping them play and communicate with each other. This successfully supports children to behave well.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Staff help children notice small details about their environment. For instance, when examining a tray of natural sea resources, adults support children to hold shells to their ears and notice the sounds they hear inside. In addition, staff supporting children playing around sand trays point out how sand falling from fingers reminds them of rain. These shared observations help children to develop a love for exploring the natural world.

p.2

need to do better?

n The provider does not fulfil their responsibility to ensure that children are adequately safeguarded. Contractors from outside agencies, who have not been vetted by the provider, are left unsupervised in areas accessible to children. For example, during busy transition times, unknown adults are able to walk unsupervised through a hallway which adjoins an unsecured disabled toilet and classrooms, which have doors that are wedged open. As a result, the safety and well-being of children in the setting are not secure. n The provider has not met their obligations to keep the premises fit for purpose. For instance, one fire exit has an intermittent fault with an exit door that requires force to open. The provider has known about the faulty door for some time and has failed to take sufficient action. This does not ensure that fire safety arrangements would be effective in the event of an emergency.

p.2

need to do better?

16 July 2024 n The provider has notified Ofsted of changes to the committee. However, they have not provided the information required for Ofsted to be able to complete the required checks to determine the suitability of committee members. n Children of all ages use the role-play resources in the side alley. This area is not always monitored by staff who are supervising outside. Leaders have installed a CCTV camera so they can monitor the side alley from the office. However, staff are not always present in the office and, on occasion, children are unsupervised in this space. This does not adequately ensure their safety. n There are weaknesses in the arrangements to operate the service when the manager is absent. The provider does not ensure that those left in charge have a fully secure understanding of the responsibilities of the manager's role. In addition, these staff do not have access to all the information and records

p.2

need to do better?

needed to ensure the safe and efficient running of the setting. n There is very good support for children with speech and language delays. The knowledgeable and passionate special educational needs coordinator (SENCO) works effectively with specialist professionals to improve outcomes for children with communication needs. She has adapted specialist resources, for example communication mats, to further support language use at snack time. She also runs regular sessions with children that have helped to develop their speech sounds. Children who need additional support for their speech and communication make good progress in these areas. n Staff are enthusiastic and have a positive energy they share with the children. This supports children to have a go at new activities they might find challenging. For instance, during a yoga session, staff encourage children to make up fun names, such as 'dragonfly' and 'flamingo', for their yoga poses. Children enjoy

p.3

need to do better?

these sessions while developing important listening, attention and gross motor skills that support their ongoing development.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.

p.3

Due date

ensure that adults whose suitability has not been determined do not have unsupervised access to children 02/09/2024

p.3

Due date

16 July 2024 ensure that effective fire safety arrangements are in place, specifically that fire exit doors are able to be opened easily from the inside 02/09/2024

p.3

Due date

ensure that Ofsted is provided with the information needed to check the suitability of committee members 02/09/2024

p.4

Due date

ensure staff are deployed so that children are within sight or hearing at all times, as required 02/09/2024

p.4

Due date

implement appropriate arrangements to ensure the safe and efficient running of the provision at times when the manager is not present. 02/09/2024

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 507939 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 10348720 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Full day care

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 50 Number of children on roll 78 Name of registered person Phoenix Pre-School Committee

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 02392498500 Date of previous inspection 13 November 2018

p.5

Information about this early years setting

Phoenix Pre-School established in 1981. It operates from a purpose-built building on the site of Riders Infant School, situated in the Leigh Park area of Portsmouth. The pre-school is open each weekday from 8am to 3pm during term times. It is in receipt of funding to provide free early education for children aged two, three and four years. A team of 13 staff work with the children. Of these, three hold an appropriate qualification from level 4 to level 6 and nine staff hold an appropriate qualification at level 3.

p.5

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The deputy manager, SENCO and inspector completed a learning walk together of all areas of the setting and discussed the early years curriculum. n Children spoke to the inspector during the inspection. n The SENCO spoke to the inspector about how they support children with special educational needs and/or disabilities. n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the suitability of staff working in the setting.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

16 July 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion