Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Childminder in Harrow
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
25 Jul 2024
- URN verified
2718273
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment2
“The provider improved her risk assessments to keep children safe.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 300
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2.
p.1
Summary of outcome
If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 3 July 2024, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 23 July 2024, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider had failed to notify Ofsted of significant information within the required timescales. We also found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n provide the relevant details to Ofsted of any persons who are living or working on the premises from which childminding is provided, in order to allow Ofsted to carry out their background suitability checks
p.1
Summary of outcome
n make sure children are not left unsupervised with unvetted adults
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure risk assessments are fully effective to minimise any potential risks to children's welfare and safety
p.1
Summary of outcome
We monitored the provider's responses to the actions served. The provider took adequate action to provide relevant details of adults living or working on the premises. The provider assured Ofsted that children will not be left unsupervised with unvetted adults. The provider improved her risk assessments to keep children safe. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion