Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Building Blocks
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Building Blocks (Wirral) Limited
- Group reference verified
RP906092
- Inspection date verified
26 Jun 2024
- Inspectors verified
Natalie Myatt
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
CH42 9PZ
- Name on report verified
Building Blocks
- URN verified
306356
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children's well-being and safety are compromised due to ineffective safeguarding policies and procedures. p.2
- When parents share concerns about their child's development, these are not always acted upon. p.2
- Furthermore, staff do not always recognise when children have delays in their development. p.2
- These weaknesses have a significant impact on the safety and well-being of children. p.2
- The curriculum is poorly designed and implemented. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- design a curriculum that is sharply focused on the knowledge and skills that children need in all areas, to help them succeed p.4
- ensure the curriculum intent and implementation are embedded securely throughout the setting p.4
- use effective assessment to plan learning experiences that meet children's needs. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
SEND & inclusion6
“The support for children with SEND is not good enough.” p.2Teaching & assessment3
“use effective assessment to plan learning experiences that meet children's needs.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 886
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Building Blocks Grayson, 67 Prenton Road West, Prenton, Cheshire CH42 9PZ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Children's well-being and safety are compromised due to ineffective safeguarding policies and procedures. Additionally, staff do not have a secure understanding of safe sleeping guidance. These weaknesses have a significant impact on the safety and well-being of children.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The curriculum is narrow and does not support children, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), to learn effectively. Staff do not have a suitable understanding of child development. For example, they expect children to sit still for extended periods of time and tell children to listen quietly when they become restless. The provider does not support staff to improve the quality of their teaching. As a result, children do not make progress in some aspects of their learning.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
There are some strengths in the nursery. Staff provide children with opportunities to develop their independence. Children are encouraged to complete personal care tasks, such as wiping their own noses and washing their hands. After lunch, children clear away their plates with the support of staff. As a result, children develop the independence skills they need for school. Children form strong bonds with their key person, which helps them to feel happy and settled.
p.2
need to do better?
n The provider is aware that the quality of practice has declined significantly since the previous inspection. They are committed to making changes to improve this shortfall. For example, the provider has recently employed an experienced special educational needs coordinator (SENCo). However, it is too early to see the impact of this support. n The curriculum is poorly designed and implemented. For example, children spend an extended amount of time being taught how to clap the number of syllables in their names. The curriculum does not give children the rich experiences they need to learn about the world around them. As a result, children do not benefit from meaningful learning, which hinders their progress. n The provider does not obtain an enhanced criminal records check for all apprentices who have unsupervised access to children. This does not ensure that all adults on site are suitable to work with children. Furthermore, the provider
p.2
need to do better?
has not referred an allegation about staff to the appropriate agencies. Consequently, the allegation has not been thoroughly investigated. This compromises children's safety. n The support for children with SEND is not good enough. The provider does not work effectively with other agencies or follow their expert advice. At times, children with SEND are not fully included in all activities. As a result, they do not
p.2
need to do better?
26 June 2024 benefit from meaningful activities that engage them. Furthermore, staff do not always recognise when children have delays in their development. Consequently, their needs go unnoticed. The newly appointed SENCo has made detailed plans to improve practice in this area. However, these are not yet implemented. n Children's key workers build positive relationships with parents and give them daily feedback about their children's care. However, staff do not consistently share information with parents about their children's learning and development. When parents share concerns about their child's development, these are not always acted upon. This does not provide continuity in children's learning. n Staff have high expectations for children's behaviour. As a result, children are beginning to follow the rules and understand why these are in place. However, staff do not support children to understand their feelings. For example, staff tell
p.2
need to do better?
children to 'sit out' until they can behave, without finding the root cause of the behaviour. As a result, children do not learn effective strategies to manage their emotions. n Staff do not use assessment effectively to build on what children know and can do. Most activities are planned without clear learning intentions that support children's next steps in learning. For example, staff ask young children lots of closed questions and encourage them to repeat words. This does not entice children to think for themselves, and they become disengaged. n Staff do not always provide suitable bedding to ensure children's safety as they sleep. For example, young children are settled to sleep under thick fleece blankets. This does not reflect safe sleeping guidance and poses a risk to children's safety. n The provider does not always recognise gaps in practice. As a result, some weaknesses have not been addressed. Furthermore, the provider has not
p.3
need to do better?
provided effective support and training to staff, to help them improve their practice. This means children have not been fully supported in their early education.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
26 June 2024 ensure all leaders and staff understand and follow the setting's safeguarding policies and procedures 04/01/2025
p.3
Due date
obtain enhanced criminal records checks for every person over the age of 16 who works on the premises when children are present 04/01/2025
p.4
Due date
ensure there are arrangements in place to support the needs of children with SEND 04/01/2025
p.4
Due date
ensure staff understand and follow all safe sleeping guidance 04/01/2025
p.4
Due date
provide staff with support, coaching and training to help improve the quality of provision for children. 04/01/2025
p.4
should:
n design a curriculum that is sharply focused on the knowledge and skills that children need in all areas, to help them succeed n ensure the curriculum intent and implementation are embedded securely throughout the setting n use effective assessment to plan learning experiences that meet children's needs.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 306356 Local authority Wirral Inspection number 10346945 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Full day care
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 40 Number of children on roll 64 Name of registered person Building Blocks (Wirral) Limited
p.5
reference number
Telephone number 0151 609 1049 Date of previous inspection 22 August 2018
p.5
Information about this early years setting
Building Blocks opened in 1997 and is situated in Prenton, Birkenhead. The nursery employs 12 members of childcare staff. Of these, nine staff hold qualifications at level 3, and one member of staff holds early years professional status. The nursery opens from Monday to Friday, 51 weeks of the year. Sessions are from 7.30am to 6pm. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year- old children.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The manager and inspector completed a learning walk together of all areas of the nursery and discussed the early years curriculum. n The inspector spoke to children, to find out about their time at the setting. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The SENCo spoke to the inspector about how they support children with SEND. n The manager and the inspector carried out a joint observation during circle time. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector. n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and
p.6
Inspection activities
outdoors, and assessed the impact this had on children's learning.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
26 June 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion