Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Angel Face Pre-school & Breakfast After School Club Limited
- Group reference verified
RP906651
- Inspection date verified
28 Jun 2024
- Inspectors verified
Kate Daurge
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
BR1 5QW
- Name on report verified
Angelface Preschool
- URN verified
EY540304
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As a result, not all staff feel confident about the action they must take in the event of a concern about children's safety. p.2
- For example, staff do not always give children, including those with SEND, the support they need to join in. p.2
- Children's ability to develop the skills they need to be ready for the next stage of their education is limited. p.2
- As a result, not all staff understand fully the procedures they must follow. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health4
“As a result, children do not develop high levels of confidence and self-esteem.” p.2Communication & language4
“However, staff do not always consider the language needs of individual children.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 809
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Angelface Preschool 5 Oakridge Road, Bromley BR1 5QW
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Leaders do not ensure that safeguarding policies and procedures are implemented consistently to keep children safe. As a result, not all staff understand fully the procedures they must follow. This jeopardises children's safety.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Leaders have a strong vision for the pre-school. They aim to support children to gain resilience and independence. However, challenges in staffing have led to inconsistencies in how this vision is shared. For example, staff do not give children sufficient access to challenging learning opportunities. This includes those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and disadvantaged children. As a result, not all children are well prepared for the next stage of their education.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Staff get to know the children well. They build relationships with them and offer reassurance when children are upset. Overall, children are happy and relaxed. However, staff do not have consistently high expectations of children. For example, they sometimes tell children 'no', when they ask to try new activities. Staff do not always encourage children to make choices or explore new skills. As a result, children do not develop high levels of confidence and self-esteem.
p.2
need to do better?
n Leaders do not always follow the procedure for checking the suitability of staff. For example, Disclosure and Barring Service checks are not obtained for all staff. Background checks are not always obtained for new members of staff. As a result, the suitability of staff cannot be assured. n Leaders do not sufficiently support staff to implement the safeguarding policy. Procedures for checking all staff understand the pre-school policy lack rigour. As a result, not all staff feel confident about the action they must take in the event of a concern about children's safety. Therefore, leaders cannot assure children's safety. n The curriculum aims are to support children to have a go, experience setbacks and build resilience. However, opportunities for sharing this vision are not effective. Staff do not share a common understanding of the curriculum. Children are routinely unable to make choices, challenge themselves and
p.2
need to do better?
persevere. This limits children's emotional security. n Procedures for sharing good practice are not robust enough. For example, there are inconsistencies in how staff teach children the rules and expectations of the pre-school. Staff do not remind all children to share and take turns. Opportunities for children to develop positive attitudes to learning are limited. Children are not able to take pride in their achievements and develop high levels of self-esteem. n Leaders use additional funding well to help disadvantaged children to make
p.2
need to do better?
28 June 2024 progress. However, they do not maintain sufficient oversight of how staff are deployed to support learning. For example, staff do not always give children, including those with SEND, the support they need to join in. Children's ability to develop the skills they need to be ready for the next stage of their education is limited. Not all children are able to achieve their developmental milestones. n Staff understand that some children need additional support to develop communication skills. However, staff do not always consider the language needs of individual children. For example, interactions with some children are limited. Not all children, including children who speak English as an additional language, are able to hear and use new language. This limits children's ability to develop fluency. n Leaders make links with local partners, where required. For example, where children have gaps in their learning, they ensure that the right support is in
p.2
need to do better?
place. Children receive expert help, where required. n Leaders and staff understand that it is important for children to learn about other people and communities. They support children to learn about differences by making strong links with their local community centre. They gain a respect for and understanding of other people. n Parents receive information about what their children are learning about at the pre-school. The staff provide them with regular updates. Parents report that this helps children to settle well at the pre-school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.
p.3
Due date
ensure that suitability checks are obtained for all staff working at the pre- school, to safeguard children 31/07/2024
p.3
Due date
ensure that the procedures for reporting safeguarding concerns are understood by all staff, to keep children safe 31/07/2024
p.3
Due date
28 June 2024 ensure that all staff have a shared common understanding of the curriculum so that all children are able to develop emotional security 31/07/2024
p.3
Due date
ensure that all staff give children consistent messages to support them to understand the rules and expectations of the pre-school 31/07/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure that staff are deployed effectively to support all children, including those with SEND, to reach their developmental milestones 31/07/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure that good practice is shared so that all staff are consistently able to support children to develop communication and language skills, including children with SEND and those who speak English as an additional language. 31/07/2024
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY540304 Local authority Lewisham Inspection number 10351890 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 20 Number of children on roll 37
p.5
Name of registered person
Angel Face Pre-school & Breakfast After School Club Limited
p.5
reference number
Telephone number 02086985088 Date of previous inspection 30 October 2018
p.5
Information about this early years setting
Angelface Preschool registered in 2017. It is situated in Bromley, in the London Borough of Bromley. It employs seven members of childcare staff. Of these, one holds an appropriate early years qualification at level 5 and five staff hold qualifications at level 2 and above. The pre-school opens from Monday to Friday, term time only. Sessions are from 8am until 6pm. The provider also receives pupil premium funding for children aged two, three and four years of age.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The manager joined the inspector on a learning walk and talked to the inspector about their curriculum and what they want their children to learn. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector carried out joint observations of group activities with the manager. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector. n The manager showed the inspector documentation to demonstrate the suitability of staff.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
28 June 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion