Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Whiteshill Preschool Playgroup

Inspected 4 Jul 2024 · published 7 Aug 2024 · URN EY348590

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Whiteshill Playgroup Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP907885

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Jul 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Sarah-Louise Clements

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Whiteshill Preschool Playgroup

  • URN verified

    EY348590

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−46Criticalmore positive than 35% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelymake good progresspositiveeagereffectiveclear
Criticismnot effectiveweaknessesweakpoornot positiveconcernsnot alwaysyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings693w−55
  • Safeguarding119w−4

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
783
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 51
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 1
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Safeguarding 9%About the inspection 39%

Full report text

Inspection of Whiteshill Preschool Playgroup Whiteshill Scout Hut, Whiteshill Playing Fields, Main Road, Whiteshill, Stroud GL6 6AN

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Weaknesses in the leadership and management of the pre-school impact on the welfare of children. The committee do not have a good understanding of their roles and responsibilities. For example, they do not monitor staff practice to ensure that all staff, including those with management responsibilities, have the skills they need to be able to fulfil their duties. This has a negative impact on the care and education children receive.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Many staff have a weak understanding of how children learn. This means that they do not support children to build on what they already know and can do to help ensure they make good progress. The provider identifies the weaknesses in teaching practice and is accessing support from the local authority to help improve the delivery of the curriculum. However, improvements are yet to be seen and the quality of education is poor.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The strategies that staff use to support children's behaviour are not effective. For example, when children do not use scissors appropriately, staff take them away without explaining why and children become upset. Staff are not consistent in managing children's behaviour. This results in children being unsure of what is expected of them and does not promote a positive attitude towards learning and behaviour.

p.2

need to do better?

n The committee do not have oversight of the pre-school. As a result, they do not take appropriate action to ensure that all staff undertake their roles effectively. When concerns are raised about the practice of staff, they do not act to support, coach and manage their performance to help ensure children receive high- quality care and education. n Leaders do not make sure that there is a capable and competent person in charge of the pre-school at all times. As a result, staff do not receive the support and guidance they need to be able to fulfil their responsibilities, implement the curriculum or interact with children in a way that supports their progress. n The committee does not ensure that new members are notified to Ofsted. This means that the relevant checks have not been conducted to ensure that they are suitable to work with children. n Staff state that those with management responsibility are making some positive

p.2

need to do better?

changes for the children who attend the pre-school. Staff have received recent curriculum training as a team, however, this has not yet had the desired impact. For example, staff sit with children as they explore with diggers and rice but do not model play or use language that is appropriate for children's levels of development. As a result, children who play with this activity repetitively tip and

p.2

need to do better?

4 July 2024 pour rice for long periods of time or lose interest. n The provider is beginning to build close working relationships with parents to support children's development. Staff with management responsibility liaise with local schools to share information about children to help them to transition from pre-school. n Staff do not always help children to understand what is expected of them to help them learn to manage their own behaviour. When children run indoors or get up from the table during mealtimes, staff ask them not to, but do not help them to understand why this is important or the consequences their actions may have. Furthermore, during routine tasks, some children become confused and upset because they do not know what is happening next. For example, some staff do not use effective strategies to make younger children aware when it is time to have their nappies changed, children run away from staff, some staff then pick

p.2

need to do better?

up children and carry them to the bathroom without helping them to understand what is happening and why. n Children have good relationships with their peers and staff. In the garden, children hold hands, giggle and run together. Children create pictures with watercolour paints. When they finish, they are eager to show staff their creations and beam with happiness at the praise they receive.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.

p.3

Due date

ensure that the committee have clear oversight of the pre-school and monitor the practice of all staff to ensure they are providing effective care and education for children 29/08/2024

p.3

Due date

ensure there is a capable and competent person present to lead the setting at all times 29/08/2024

p.3

Due date

4 July 2024 implement a meaningful curriculum and ensure staff have the support they need to provide good-quality learning experiences for all children 29/08/2024

p.3

Due date

ensure staff manage children's behaviour effectively to help them understand what is expected of them and the consequences their actions may have on themselves and others. 29/08/2024

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY348590 Local authority Gloucestershire Inspection number 10355626 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Sessional day care

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 26 Number of children on roll 25 Name of registered person Whiteshill Playgroup Committee

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 07591 240203 Date of previous inspection 10 July 2019

p.5

Information about this early years setting

Whiteshill Preschool Playgroup registered in 1996. It operates from the village scout hut in Whiteshill, Gloucestershire. The pre-school is open from 8.30am to 3pm on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday during term time. It employs five members of staff. Of these, one holds qualified teacher status, two hold qualifications at level 3, one holds a level 2 qualification and one is unqualified. The pre-school receives funding to provide free early education for children aged two-, three- and four-years-old.

p.5

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The manager and inspector completed a learning walk together of all areas of the pre-school and discussed the early years curriculum. n Children communicated with the inspector during the inspection. n Staff spoke to the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector spoke with the nominated individual about the leadership and management of the setting. n The inspector spoke to several parents during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the suitability of staff working in the setting.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

4 July 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion