Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Snettisham Bobtails
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
25 Jul 2024
- URN verified
EY545971
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 284
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2 . If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 12 July 2024, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 19 July 2024, we carried out a regulatory telephone call. We found that the provider had failed to notify Ofsted of a significant event and had failed to notify Ofsted when they had appointed a new manager. This is a requirement of their registration.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We also found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements but had taken action to put this right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider had failed to release a child, back into the safe care of their parent/carer, at the end of the pre-school session. Following the incident the provider carried out an internal investigation. They immediately reviewed and improved arrival and collection procedures and shared these with staff and parents. They are further improving safety and security arrangements over the summer holiday break, when children are not present, to minimise the risk of a repeat incident.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion