Summary
Donna Chambers (lead), Deborah Mosley, Rachael Snowdon-Poole
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
7 May 2024
- Inspectors verified
Deborah Mosley, Donna Chambers, Rachael Snowdon-Poole
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
DE4 2BW
- Name on report verified
Elton CofE Primary School
- URN verified
112815
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders do not always act on safeguarding concerns raised by staff. p.4
- Some parents said that the school does not always listen to their safeguarding concerns. p.4
- This means that pupils could be at risk of harm. p.4
- Pupils are not always respectful to each other or towards staff. p.2
- This means that pupils are not always confident that staff will deal with issues when they arise. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some staff lack the knowledge they need to identify pupils who may be at risk of harm. 1 and 7 May 2024 p.3
- The school must ensure that all staff deliver the p.4
- The key knowledge and skills that pupils should learn have not been clearly identified. p.2
- Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not get the support they need to access the curriculum. p.2
- They are not fully aware of what needs to improve. p.2
- The school’s expectations of how pupils should behave are not high enough. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics8
“phonics scheme consistently well.” p.4Leadership & governance8
“Leaders do not always act on safeguarding concerns raised by staff.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,699
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 62, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 19%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Elton CofE Primary School Main Street, Elton, Matlock, Derbyshire DE4 2BW
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Previous inspection grade Good 1 and 7 May 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
This is a small and welcoming school. However, the school has not ensured that pupils are safe, behave well and are able to learn.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has not ensured that pupils receive an acceptable standard of education. The curriculum does not meet the needs of all pupils. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not get the support they need to access the curriculum. These pupils do not achieve well. They are not well prepared for the next stage of their education.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
In lessons, some pupils do not always behave well. Staff frequently ignore pupils’ poor behaviour. At lunchtime, some pupils do not play safely. Staff do not always address this. Pupils are not always respectful to each other or towards staff. Pupils report that bullying does happen. They say that adults do not deal with their concerns properly. The school does not follow up incidents robustly. This means that pupils are not always confident that staff will deal with issues when they arise. Pupils do not always feel safe in school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school supports pupils’ wider development. Pupils are taught how to be safe, including when using the internet. Pupils enjoy a range of trips and visits. Pupils take part in a variety of clubs. They enjoy learning about cultures and religions different from their own.
p.2
better?
Leaders and governors do not have a clear enough oversight of the work of the school. They are not fully aware of what needs to improve. As a result, they are not doing enough to address the school’s weaknesses. They have an overly positive view of pupils’ behaviour and how well pupils learn. Leaders do not check effectively how well the curriculum is implemented.
p.2
better?
The school has not ensured that there is a well-planned curriculum in place. The key knowledge and skills that pupils should learn have not been clearly identified. Consequently, pupils experience a disjointed series of lessons in many subjects. Teachers do not check that pupils have understood what they have been taught. They do not address gaps in learning or misconceptions. Pupils do not achieve as well as they could.
p.2
better?
Teachers regularly read stories to pupils. Younger pupils enjoy story times. Pupils start learning phonics as soon as they start in the Reception class. The school follows a phonics scheme. However, staff do not deliver the scheme well. Staff do not always check what pupils know. Staff do not help pupils catch up when there are gaps in their phonics knowledge. As a result, pupils do not gain the knowledge and skills they need to become confident, fluent readers. Pupils do not progress as well as they might in their reading. 1 and 7 May 2024
p.2
3
The school does not accurately identify the needs of pupils with SEND. The school ensures that staff receive some information about how to meet the needs of pupils with SEND. However, this information is not clear and does not detail the strategies staff can use to support these pupils. Staff do not adapt the curriculum to meet these pupils’ needs. Expectations of what these pupils can achieve are too low and they do not achieve well.
p.3
3
The school’s expectations of how pupils should behave are not high enough. The school has not established effective systems to support pupils to behave well. Staff do not help pupils to understand how to behave in an acceptable way. Leaders do not support staff to consistently manage pupils’ behaviour. Some staff ignore poor behaviour. At times, some pupils ignore or rebut requests from staff. This results in poor behaviour in lessons and at unstructured times. Some pupils say that they do not always feel safe. The school does not have effective systems in place to monitor pupils’ behaviour and bullying incidents. This means that the school is unable to analyse incidents to gain an accurate understanding of what it needs to do to improve behaviour and reduce bullying.
p.3
3
Pupils enjoy taking part in a range of clubs and activities in school. Pupils value the lessons that develop their personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) understanding. They understand that these lessons help to keep them safe and prepare them for later life. Pupils learn about the importance of consent. They learn about tolerance and respecting difference. However, some pupils do not always treat others with respect. The personal development curriculum has been written to reflect the needs of the school community. However, the school’s wider work does not always support pupils to be confident and resilient learners. The school provides opportunities for pupils to develop beyond the academic curriculum. For example, there is an off-site residential visit every year.
p.3
3
The school does not always address parental concerns well. Some parents and carers said that they do not feel that they, or their children, are listened to.
p.3
3
Staff say that they are proud to work at the school. They appreciate the efforts that the school makes to manage their workload and well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The school carries out the appropriate checks on the suitability of adults before they start working with pupils.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders, staff and governors complete the required safeguarding training. However, the school has not done enough to ensure that safeguarding has a high profile in the school. Some staff lack the knowledge they need to identify pupils who may be at risk of harm. 1 and 7 May 2024
p.3
4
The school does not respond to safeguarding concerns quickly enough. Specialist advice is not always sought. Safeguarding records are not detailed enough. It is not clear what help pupils and their families have received. Key information is not always shared with agencies who could support pupils and their families.
p.4
4
Pupils learn how to stay safe online. However, some pupils say they have been able to freely access inappropriate material when online in school. Staff are not alert to the potential risks to pupils that this poses. Supervision of pupils, both around school and when online, is not good enough. The school had routinely provided parents and pupils with the access code to the school’s front door. Parents and pupils have been able to freely come and go into the school building. Staff did not monitor who was entering and exiting the school. This puts pupils at risk of harm. This practice was stopped during the inspection.
p.4
4
Some parents said that their safeguarding concerns are not listened to. The school does not always take these concerns seriously.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school has not established a strong culture of safeguarding. Safeguarding procedures are not rigorous enough. Staff are not confident when discussing safeguarding incidents. Leaders do not always act on safeguarding concerns raised by staff. Some parents said that the school does not always listen to their safeguarding concerns. Safeguarding records are not clear. Important information is not always shared with other agencies quickly enough. This means that pupils could be at risk of harm. The school should ensure that all staff understand the risks that pupils may face and that they follow safeguarding procedures in full. The school should also ensure that safeguarding records are clear, and actions are taken swiftly to keep all pupils safe. Teachers do not deliver the reading curriculum effectively. As a result, too many pupils cannot read well enough. The school must ensure that all staff deliver the
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
phonics scheme consistently well. The school has not ensured that there is a coherently planned or well-sequenced curriculum in place. As a result, pupils’ learning is fragmented, and they do not build their knowledge sufficiently well. The school should ensure that there is a well-sequenced curriculum for all subjects that meets pupils’ needs. The school should also ensure that all staff implement the curriculum as intended. The school does not meet the needs of pupils with SEND. These pupils are not having their needs identified accurately. Staff are not given the appropriate strategies to support these pupils. They do not adapt the curriculum to meet pupils’ needs. The school should ensure that the needs of pupils with SEND are identified accurately, and that all staff adapt their teaching so that these pupils can access the curriculum and achieve well. 1 and 7 May 2024
p.4
5
Staff do not have high-enough expectations of pupils’ behaviour. They do not implement the behaviour policy consistently. The school does not have systems in place to monitor pupils’ behaviour and bullying incidents closely. Some pupils do not behave well, and some do not feel safe. The school should ensure that there are high expectations of pupils’ behaviour and that all staff apply the behaviour policy consistently. The school should also ensure that it deals with any bullying incidents effectively so that all pupils feel safe. Leaders and those responsible for governance do not have sufficient oversight of the school. They do not recognise the school’s weaknesses. Governors do not hold leaders to account. The school should ensure that leaders and governors have an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses so that issues can be addressed swiftly. The school should also ensure that everyone is
p.5
5
held to account for the improvements that need to be made. The school may not appoint early career teachers before the next monitoring inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘ disadvantaged pupils ’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 1 and 7 May 2024
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
School details
Dates of previous inspection 30 and 31 January 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The school is a Church of England school. The last section 48 inspection took place in July 2017. This is an inspection of the school’s religious character. The school does not make use of alternative provision.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a graded (section 5) inspection under the same Act.
p.6
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 1 and 7 May 2024
p.6
7
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors met with the headteacher, subject leaders and members of staff. The inspectors met with governors and a local authority representative. The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, science and music. For each of these subjects, the inspectors held discussions with subject leaders, visited lessons, spoke with teachers and pupils and looked at pupils’ work. The inspectors listened to pupils reading. The inspectors reviewed a range of documents including the school’s self- evaluation documents, policies and curriculum plans. The inspectors observed breaktimes and lunchtime. Inspectors spoke to a range of staff and pupils. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single
p.7
7
central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspectors spoke with parents and considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. Inspectors considered the feedback from staff to the Ofsted staff survey.
p.7
Inspection team
Donna Chambers, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Deborah Mosley His Majesty’s Inspector 1 and 7 May 2024
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion