Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Jotmans Hall Primary School

Inspected 4 Jul 2024 · published 23 Jul 2024 · URN 137247

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Daniel Short (lead), Danny Wagstaff, Nicola Shadbolt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Jul 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Daniel Short, Danny Wagstaff, Nicola Shadbolt

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    SS7 5RG

  • Name on report verified

    Jotmans Hall Primary School

  • URN verified

    137247

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivehigh-qualityeffectivelyenjoyeffectiveconsistenthappyclear
Criticismnot consistentlylapsesincompletenot alwayslacklackingtoo manyunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1126w+8
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve59w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,161
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Jotmans Hall Primary School High Road, Benfleet, Essex SS7 5RG

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The headteacher of this school is Sarah Warnes. This school is a single-academy trust. The trust is overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Paul Hodges. 3 and 4 July 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school’s emphasis on regular attendance, happiness and safety creates a positive environment for learning. So, many pupils enjoy coming to school. But pupils’ ability to demonstrate what they know through discussion and their schoolwork varies. This is because the explanations, instructions and feedback they receive are not always clear. Also, the opportunities for revision are not working well enough to help pupils to remember content.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils base their conduct on the ‘E.R.I.C’ values: effort, respect, independence and communication. Pupils, for example, show respect in how they kindly discuss the ways people may differ. It shows too in how they invite others to play at break and lunchtimes. Pupils make the most of their social time by chatting and playing in a productive manner. They balance on tyres, exercise on gym equipment and explore the nature trail.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There are many opportunities that broaden pupils’ horizons. Pupils and their parents appreciate the range of extra-curricular clubs. These include choir, dodgeball and tennis. Pupils can form bands, learn to play instruments and perform for an audience. School trips also enhance learning. For example, Reception-age children visited the theatre. They watched a production of a book they had been studying. These experiences create happy memories and foster pupils’ positive attitude towards education.

p.2

better?

The school is making significant improvements. However, some issues still hinder all pupils from receiving a consistent, high-quality education. The recent required restructure was a challenge. Leaders rightly avoided overwhelming staff with too many additional changes at once. Staff support the considered, gradual changes that are being implemented. However, many of these are still new and require further work to become consistent and effective.

p.2

better?

The school continues to fine-tune its curriculum, including in the early years. This includes adopting or adapting high-quality schemes of work. Work is underway to extract and present the precise words, concepts and skills pupils should learn from Reception through to Year 6. The aim is to make this clear for staff so they know what to teach, but also what to check pupils know and can do. Because this work is incomplete, staff cannot effectively check pupils’ understanding to inform their teaching and help more pupils keep up with the learning.

p.2

better?

Curriculum leaders do not consistently check how staff present information. They also do not check how staff arrange activities and give feedback to pupils. As a result, some pupils get unclear teaching. This leads to confusion and difficulty in learning. Pupils’ workbooks vary in quality. Some show pride and thorough work, 3 and 4 July 2024

p.2

3

while others lack it. This means some pupils miss out on practise, especially in writing, which affects their achievement. While leaders are aware of this and have a plan to address it, they have not yet had sufficient time to put the plan into action.

p.3

3

Since the last inspection, the school has made positive strides to strengthen the phonics and reading programmes. For example, daily paired reading sessions involve dedicated staff helping pupils read aloud to improve their fluency. The school also collaborates with external experts to continually improve provision for reading. However, as in other subjects, staff are not consistently receiving feedback on how to enhance their teaching. Consequently, the teaching and additional support for pupils is sometimes lacking, leading to guesswork that hinders some pupils’ confidence and progress.

p.3

3

The school takes a proactive approach to inclusion. Initiatives like the ‘Jolly Jotmans’ lunchtime club create a supportive environment, where pupils feel valued. Leaders developed a comprehensive checklist for identifying the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The results guide staff on adjustments to support pupils’ behaviour and learning. While this process generally works well, there are occasional lapses in communication with parents. It leaves some of them unsure about their child’s additional support and how they can help from home.

p.3

3

The school successfully improves pupil attendance by tracking absences promptly and clearly communicating absence reporting expectations to parents. It balances support and challenge for parents of frequently absent pupils, with trustees backing leaders for necessary actions. The school also collaborates with external agencies to provide pupils with mental health and well-being support.

p.3

3

The personal development programme works in tandem with the school behaviour policy to create pupils who are typically confident and kind. Pupils enjoy taking on responsibilities. They serve as anti-bullying ambassadors, digital leaders or school councillors. Pupils feel proud when people outside of school recognise their efforts. For instance, the eco-council’s work to improve the school’s environmental impact.

p.3

3

Trustees actively encourage and create networking opportunities with external experts and local schools. They understand that being outward facing helps the school showcase its strengths and learn from the best practices of others.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The curriculum refinement from Reception through to Year 6 is incomplete. As a result, staff struggle to effectively check pupils’ understanding, impacting their ability to ensure all pupils keep up with learning. Leaders should expedite the 3 and 4 July 2024

p.3

4

refinement process and establish clear methods for staff to assess pupils’ learning to closely inform their teaching.  Staff do not consistently receive feedback on improving their teaching in subjects, like phonics and reading. This creates gaps in teaching quality and additional support, hindering some pupils’ progress. Leaders should receive training, time and support to effectively monitor teaching and provide staff with the necessary guidance to teach the curriculum, including early reading, confidently and effectively.  There are occasional lapses in communication with parents of pupils with SEND about their child’s support and how they can help at home. As a result, some parents feel dissatisfied and unaware of the school’s efforts. To address this, the school should maintain consistent communication, informing parents about their child’s progress, offering guidance on supporting their child at home and

p.4

4

providing specific timeframes for follow-up actions.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 3 and 4 July 2024

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 10 and 11 May 2023, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The published admissions number is 45. Because of this, some pupils are in single-year classes, while others are in mixed-year classes.  The school does not make use of any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with leaders, including the headteacher, two assistant headteachers, special educational needs coordinator, five trustees and a representative working on behalf of the local authority. 3 and 4 July 2024

p.5

6

 Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, computing and art. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to staff, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector also listened to a sample of pupils read to a familiar adult.  To further inspect the curriculum, inspectors explored provision in the early years, support for pupils with SEND and a selection of pupils’ workbooks from across the curriculum.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors reviewed school documentation, including policies, the school

p.6

6

development plan, reports from a school improvement consultant, minutes from meetings of the trust board, and a report from a school resource management adviser working for the Education and Skills Funding Agency.  Inspectors considered the responses to surveys. These included 40 responses to the pupil survey, 22 responses to the staff survey and 34 responses, including 26 free-text responses, to Ofsted Parent View. Inspectors also held separate discussions with pupils, parents and staff.

p.6

Inspection team

Daniel Short, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Danny Wagstaff Ofsted Inspector 3 and 4 July 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion