Other · Ofsted report
Northumbria University
Summary
Jen Sloan (lead), Adrian Fearn, Dughall McCormick, Julie McGrane, Katherine Spurr, Lesley Sullivan
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
23 May 2024
- Inspectors verified
Adrian Fearn, Dughall McCormick, Jen Sloan, Julie McGrane, Katherine Spurr, Lesley Sullivan
- Postcode verified
NE7 7XA
- Name on report verified
University of Northumbria
- URN verified
70125
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders at the university have established high expectations for trainees and for partner schools. p.1
- Headteachers are consistently positive about the quality of trainees from the University of Northumbria. p.3
- Early career teachers who have been trained at the University of Northumbria are equally positive about their experiences and how well prepared they are to meet the demands of the profession. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The university should make sure that the assurance processes are strengthened so that they can fully address any areas of improvement. ◼ Some aspects of mentor training do not support mentors as fully as they could. p.4
- The university provides trainees with the skills and the knowledge that they need to become successful teachers. p.1
- Most trainees develop the knowledge that they need to teach their chosen subjects confidently. p.2
- Leaders should ensure that training and communication supports mentoring to be fully effective for all trainees. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development11
“This has a very positive impact on trainees’ professional development.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 925
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 24%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
University of Northumbria Coach Lane Campus, Coach Lane, Benton, Newcastle NE7 7XA
p.1
Inspection judgements
Primary and secondary age-phase combined
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education and training Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
The university provides trainees with the skills and the knowledge that they need to become successful teachers. Leaders ensure that trainees receive training on how to meet the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and pupils who speak English as an additional language. Primary trainees learn about the importance of phonics and its role in supporting early reading. Overall, trainees are well prepared to teach in a variety of school contexts. Most trainees develop a sound understanding of how to teach their subjects in the primary and secondary phases. A small number of secondary trainees are less well prepared. Leaders are taking action to improve provision for these trainees.
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
Leaders at the university have established high expectations for trainees and for partner schools. These expectations are lived out in practice in most settings. Where there is some variation, for example in mentorship, leaders take action to address this. Trainees receive a largely connected experience across university and school settings. Trainees apply the training they receive at university to their school-based experiences. This helps to deepen their understanding of how theory and research works in practice. This includes their awareness of how to adapt their teaching to better support pupils with SEND.
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
Leaders ensure that trainees are listened to and that wherever possible, their views are acted on. Trainees feel that they can rely on their guidance tutors for support, both professionally and personally. This support is instrumental in meeting the individual needs of trainees and is a strength of the university’s provision.
p.1
Information about this ITE provider
◼ In the 2023/2024 academic year, the University of Northumbria has 369 trainees. Nineteen trainees are in the secondary phase and 350 trainees are in the primary phase. ◼ There are 271 trainees on the primary undergraduate route and 79 trainees on the primary post graduate route. Nineteen trainees follow the secondary postgraduate route. The primary postgraduate routes are delivered through the university or a School Direct fee-paid route. The secondary postgraduate route is delivered through a School Direct fee-paid route. ◼ Of the 98 trainees on primary and secondary postgraduate routes, 63 follow the School Direct route. ◼ In the partnership, there are 225 schools, with inspection judgements ranging from outstanding to inadequate. Partnership schools are located across 15 local authorities. ◼ In 2023/2024, secondary trainees were enrolled on the following subject courses: art, craft and design, chemistry, English, mathematics, computing and geography.
p.2
Information about this inspection
◼ The inspection team was made up of four of His Majesty’s Inspectors and two Ofsted inspectors. ◼ Inspectors met with the ITE leader and programme leaders for the undergraduate, postgraduate and School Direct routes. They met with curriculum leaders, including staff seconded from partnership schools. They also met with those responsible for quality assurance, safeguarding and student well-being. ◼ Inspectors spoke with 43 trainees in partnership schools and 14 early career teachers who had trained at the University of Northumbria. ◼ The inspectors conducted focused reviews in the following subjects: early reading, English, mathematics, geography, history, art and design and languages. ◼ Inspectors visited 11 schools over the course of the inspection. They spoke remotely with trainees and staff from other schools across the partnership. ◼ Information from trainee and staff inspection surveys were also considered by
p.2
better?
Leaders have planned a curriculum that prepares trainees to be effective practitioners. Important aspects of the curriculum, such as safeguarding and behaviour, are foregrounded to prepare students for their initial school placements. The full breadth of the core content framework is woven through trainees’ experience. Some curriculum subjects that trainees study are more developed than others. Leaders have well-considered plans to address any inconsistencies between different parts of the curriculum. Most trainees develop the knowledge that they need to teach their chosen subjects confidently. All primary trainees have opportunities to teach phonics in their placement schools. However, mentors do not get the right information about some of their trainees’ subject-specific training. This limits their ability to reinforce some elements of the central training.
p.2
better?
Course leaders’ commitment to educational research impacts positively on the development of the courses that trainees study. University staff and expert colleagues provide trainees with insight into this important research. For example, leaders involve social care colleagues and use associated research in training activities to deepen trainees’ understanding of safeguarding. Equally, opportunities for trainees to engage in other simulated experiences, for example working with parents, prepare them well for their future teaching roles.
p.3
better?
Trainees gain a well-informed understanding of the needs of pupils with SEND and who speak English as an additional language. Trainees consistently draw on their learning to meet the needs of these pupils. By the end of their training, trainees are aware of a variety of needs and how to support pupils in different subjects. Course leaders ensure that trainees experience a variety of placements to broaden their awareness of different settings and key stages. A very small number of trainees have not had the breadth of experience needed to prepare them well enough for the profession.
p.3
better?
Most trainees are well prepared for their teaching careers. Guidance tutors receive high- quality training to support groups of trainees. This has a very positive impact on trainees’ professional development. Leaders largely use quality assurance processes well to identify any inconsistencies in provision for individual trainees and to take very effective action to address this when it occurs. However, the provider is less effective in collating the wider messages from these assurance processes to inform future improvement. Some expectations of the role of mentors in supporting trainees are not communicated as clearly as they could be. This leads to some variation in the quality of mentoring that trainees receive, for example when reviewing trainees’ progress and setting targets.
p.3
better?
The university is guided by its moral purpose to support education in the region. Headteachers are consistently positive about the quality of trainees from the University of Northumbria. Many appoint trainees to their staff teams because they are well prepared to begin their careers. Early career teachers who have been trained at the University of Northumbria are equally positive about their experiences and how well prepared they are to meet the demands of the profession. Leaders are effective in supporting trainees into teaching. This commitment to remove barriers inspires trainees to do the same for the pupils that they teach.
p.3
(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)
◼ There is some variation in how well quality assurance processes are used to identify any patterns in the quality of experience that trainees receive. Some inconsistencies in trainees’ experience are not fully identified. The university should make sure that the assurance processes are strengthened so that they can fully address any areas of improvement. ◼ Some aspects of mentor training do not support mentors as fully as they could. Therefore, the quality of mentoring can be inconsistent for some trainees. Leaders should ensure that training and communication supports mentoring to be fully effective for all trainees.
p.4
comply with the ITE compliance criteria?
The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.
p.4
ITE provider details
This inspection was carried out in accordance with the initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook , which sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.
p.5
ITE provider details
Type of ITE provider Higher education institution Phases provided Primary and secondary combined Date of previous inspection 23 April and 7 November 2018
p.5
Inspection team
Jen Sloan, Lead Inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Adrian Fearn Ofsted Inspector Dughall McCormick His Majesty’s Inspector Julie McGrane Ofsted Inspector Katherine Spurr His Majesty’s Inspector Lesley Sullivan His Majesty’s Inspector
p.5
Annex: Placement schools
Inspectors visited the following schools as part of this inspection:
p.6
Name URN ITE phases
The Kings Academy 134223 Secondary Nunthorpe Academy 138845 Secondary Holywell Village First School 122195 Secondary Ponteland Primary 145780 Primary Sele First School 122242 Primary The Drive Community Primary 108361 Primary King’s Priory School 139658 Primary Richardson Dees Primary School 108596 Primary Beaconhill Community Primary 122193 Primary Knop Law Primary School 150327 Primary Backworth Primary School 108580 Primary guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Name URN ITE phases
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-
p.7
Name URN ITE phases
government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Name URN ITE phases
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Name URN ITE phases
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion