Summary
Phillip Blagg (lead), Jason Philipsz
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Jul 2024
- Inspectors verified
Jason Philipsz, Phillip Blagg
- Postcode verified
SL2 1QX
- Name on report verified
Claycots School
- URN verified
132089
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Despite the size of the school and the physical divide created by two sites, there is a strong sense of one community with a highly nurturing ethos. p.1
- Inspectors gained a strong sense that pupils in multiple classes across single year groups are accessing a broadly equal curriculum offer because of the effective oversight of leaders at all levels. p.2
- Though staff generally plan adaptions to learning well, not all staff are as confident or skilled at checking pupils’ understanding or addressing misconceptions during lessons. p.2
- Pupils told inspectors that they feel that behaviour has improved, that they feel safe, are enjoying school and learning more. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Support is in place and increasing, but more needs to be done to address this issue. p.2
- The school needs to ensure that its phonics programme is delivered with total fidelity by all staff who teach pupils to read. p.3
- The school needs to ensure that all staff are better equipped to deal with misconceptions, assess pupils’ progress and move learning on when p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language3
“Pupils talk positively about their experiences on residential trips.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,285
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Claycots School Monksfield Way, Slough, Berkshire SL2 1QX
p.1
Outcome
Claycots School continues to be a good school.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy coming to Claycots. They think it is a happy place. Despite the size of the school and the physical divide created by two sites, there is a strong sense of one community with a highly nurturing ethos. Central to this are the staff themselves, who have a shared vision to provide the best they can, no matter what pupils’ backgrounds or barriers in life are.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Children in early years get off to a good start. Those from disadvantaged backgrounds or who are in danger of falling behind when they join the school are supported well, because staff are knowledgeable and alert to their needs. The same is true for many pupils who join the school throughout the school year, many with English as an additional language.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Aspirations for what pupils can achieve are high. Pupils know this and are motivated to do their best, not afraid to try again if things go wrong. Pupils told inspectors that they feel that behaviour has improved, that they feel safe, are enjoying school and learning more. Classroom visits showed this to be the case, not least due to the enthusiastic approach of staff, described by one group of pupils as ‘well educated’ themselves.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
This is a school on an upward trajectory. Much has been done in the recent past to refine and improve the curriculum offer. Leadership of the curriculum is a passion and a strength. Staff have worked hard to ensure that the curriculum is fit for purpose and closely linked to evolving cohorts of pupils from a wide range of backgrounds. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are also supported well because the curriculum is accessible, without lowering aspiration. The impact of this is that pupils’ outcomes are improving over time and are clearly better than they were at the time of the school’s last inspection.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Older pupils are increasingly well prepared for their move to secondary education. Discussions with Year 6 pupils during a science lesson revealed a positive attitude to their 2 and 3 July 2024
p.1
2
next steps. Shared descriptions of recent ‘transition visits’ to secondary schools showed a high degree of understated confidence as horizons widen on their shared journeys as young scientists.
p.2
2
The school has made reading the central pillar of its curriculum. Older pupils talk enthusiastically about the books they have read and are reading. The school is truly a book-rich environment. Visits from authors are commonplace, including during the inspection. Much thought has gone into ensuring those that struggle to read are given additional support. Appropriate resources are available and the checks of pupils’ development as early readers are sound. Staff also benefit from ongoing expert training, though, on occasion, not all deliver the school’s chosen phonics programme with the strict fidelity required.
p.2
2
Discussions with pupils revealed their appreciation of their school as a place of learning. They value subjects such as design technology and geography equally as much as English and mathematics. The culture to learn new things clearly starts in Nursery and Reception, where a rich learning environment sparks young imaginations. Much of the school’s curriculum is firmly founded in the early years, preparing children well for the challenges of key stage 1.
p.2
2
Classroom visits on both sites of the school showed a high degree of consistency in the way staff plan learning. Inspectors gained a strong sense that pupils in multiple classes across single year groups are accessing a broadly equal curriculum offer because of the effective oversight of leaders at all levels. Where there is slight variation, this comes in the way that some staff implement the curriculum. Though staff generally plan adaptions to learning well, not all staff are as confident or skilled at checking pupils’ understanding or addressing misconceptions during lessons. When this is the case, pupils’ progress through the curriculum is not as strong as it could be. Leaders are aware of this. Support is in place and increasing, but more needs to be done to address this issue.
p.2
2
Pupils’ personal development is supported well across the school with a clear sense of purpose underpinning this important aspect of provision. A core focus is on broadening pupils’ understanding of equality, difference, varying cultures, and religions. The personal, social and health education programme is adapted well to respond to varying needs and potential issues, both in and outside of school. Pupils talk positively about their experiences on residential trips. Those from disadvantaged backgrounds are supported well to enjoy a broad range of experiences beyond the curriculum.
p.2
2
Another aspect worth celebrating is the school’s recent success in improving pupils’ attendance. Governors and key leaders have made this a key priority. They have facilitated additional resources and the capacity of staff to reduce persistent absence significantly.
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 2 and 3 July 2024
p.2
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Not all staff teach the school’s early reading programme as consistently as they might. When this is the case, the quality of phonics teaching is variable. This means that some pupils do not always benefit from the highest quality phonics teaching they need. This is also the case for some pupils who are at the early stages or struggling with reading. The school needs to ensure that its phonics programme is delivered with total fidelity by all staff who teach pupils to read. On occasion, staff do not implement the school’s intended curriculum as well as they might. In some classrooms, teachers miss opportunities to check pupils’ understanding and are not as skilled at spotting misconceptions or moving learning forward as they could be. This means that some pupils are not making as much progress with their learning as they might. The school needs to ensure that all staff are better equipped to deal with misconceptions, assess pupils’ progress and move learning on when
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in November 2018.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school. 2 and 3 July 2024
p.3
4
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 2 and 3 July 2024
p.4
School details
Number of pupils on the school roll 1708
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 20 and 21 November 2018 under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
This is a much larger than average-sized primary school situated on two sites approximately three miles apart. The school does not currently use alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors held a wide range of meetings with leaders at all levels, as well as teaching and support staff. The lead inspector met with the chair of the governing body, who was accompanied by four other governors. An inspector held a telephone conversation with officers from the local authority. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, geography, science and design technology. For each deep dive, inspectors held 2 and 3 July 2024
p.5
6
discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector heard some pupils read to a known adult. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects with leaders. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of parents, leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. I nspectors gathered evidence to explore the impact of pupils’ behaviour, the school’s wider curriculum offer and how leaders support staff with their workload. Pupils were talked to throughout the inspection to gain their views about the school. Inspectors also met formally with a representative group of pupils on both sites of the
p.6
6
school. Inspectors considered the views of parents submitted through Ofsted Parent View. The views of staff were also considered through Ofsted’s survey.
p.6
Inspection team
Clive Close, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Jason Philipsz Ofsted Inspector 2 and 3 July 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion