Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Thomas Moorside CofE (VA) Primary School
Summary
Jackie Stillings (lead), Peter Berry
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Jun 2024
- Inspectors verified
Jackie Stillings, Peter Berry
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
OL1 4RL
- Name on report verified
St Thomas Moorside CofE (VA) Primary School
- URN verified
105695
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers benefit from high-quality training to deliver most subject curriculums effectively. p.3
- This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 nine years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. p.1
- The school has high expectations for pupils’ academic achievement. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school should ensure that, where there are gaps in pupils’ reading knowledge, these are quickly remedied so that pupils read with fluency and accuracy. 25 and 26 June 2024 p.3
- Pupils have had less time to secure the essential knowledge that they need to build new learning on. p.4
- In the main, teachers carefully introduce, check and revisit the knowledge that pupils should know and remember. p.2
- The school should ensure that newly revised curriculums are implemented fully so that pupils further strengthen their knowledge in these subjects. p.4
- The school should ensure that staff are provided with suitable guidance so that they can build children’s knowledge across the early years equally well. p.4
- The school has set out clearly the knowledge that pupils should learn, and the order in which this should happen. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes3
“The school has high expectations for pupils’ academic achievement.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,262
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Thomas Moorside CofE (VA) Primary School Coleridge Road, Sholver, Oldham, Lancashire OL1 4RL
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 nine years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. The school received an ungraded inspection under section 8 of the Act on 28 November 2017. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection. 25 and 26 June 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are well cared for and are happy at school. They learn how to be healthy in mind and body. For example, many pupils take part in a wide range of sporting activities outside of the school day. Pupils are entrusted with a range of leadership roles. They relish these opportunities. Pupils who help to look after Tia, the school’s therapy dog, carry out this role with gentle respect. They know that Tia plays a part in helping them to stay mentally well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils understand how they are expected to behave. Reception-age children act as positive role models to children in the Nursery Year. They learn cooperatively alongside one another. Across the school, pupils do their best to treat others in the same way that they would like to be treated. They value earning rewards for their positive behaviour. For example, pupils wear their ‘always’ badges with genuine pride to show that they uphold the school’s golden promises consistently well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has high expectations for pupils’ academic achievement. It has made positive changes to many subject curriculums, including mathematics. Pupils typically achieve well across a broad range of subjects. This includes pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).
p.2
better?
The school’s 2023 published data shows that a significant proportion of pupils did not meet the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check. In response to this data, the school has acted decisively to improve its early reading curriculum. It has introduced a new phonics programme and made sure that staff are trained to deliver this programme well. Children in the Reception class now build their phonics knowledge securely. Pupils in key stage 1 also learn the sounds that letters represent in a more consistent way than they did previously. However, weaknesses in earlier phonics teaching mean that some pupils have gaps in their reading knowledge. This means that, despite effective support from staff, these pupils struggle to read with fluency and accuracy. On occasion, this hinders how well they access the wider curriculum.
p.2
better?
In most other subjects, the school has improved and refined its curriculum over a period of time. It has designed a suitably broad and ambitious curriculum. In doing so, the school has carefully considered staff’s workload and well-being, for example by trialling and evaluating the impact of new initiatives before rolling them out to all classes.
p.2
better?
The school has set out clearly the knowledge that pupils should learn, and the order in which this should happen. This allows pupils to build their knowledge seamlessly from the early years to Year 6 in most subjects. In the main, teachers carefully introduce, check and revisit the knowledge that pupils should know and remember. Pupils typically achieve well as a result. However, in one or two subjects, improvements to curriculum design are more recent. Pupils have had less time to 25 and 26 June 2024
p.2
3
develop and connect their learning in these subjects. Consequently, their knowledge is not as secure.
p.3
3
Teachers benefit from high-quality training to deliver most subject curriculums effectively. However, the school has not developed the expertise of some staff who teach and support children’s learning in the early years sufficiently well. This means that there is an unevenness in some children’s development. This is because some staff are not clear about how to build children’s knowledge from the Nursery Year to the Reception Year.
p.3
3
Staff throughout the school identify pupils who may have SEND accurately. This starts in the early years, where children’s needs are quickly identified. Staff are skilled at giving pupils with SEND the support that they need so that they can access the same curriculum as their classmates.
p.3
3
The school provides impressive support for pupils’ wider development, including their well-being. For example, many pupils start the school day at the breakfast club. This club brings members of the school community together and ensures that pupils arrive on time and are ready to learn.
p.3
3
Pupils benefit from a wide range of experiences, including valuable opportunities to work with pupils from other schools. They learn how to keep safe when they are online. Pupils are well prepared for the changes that will happen to them as they grow up.
p.3
3
Children in the early years listen carefully to adults and follow instructions closely. Older pupils consolidate this positive start and behave well.
p.3
3
The governing body’s ambition for all pupils to succeed is palpable. Governors provide insightful challenge and support, to ensure that the school keeps improving. For example, governors make sure that the school takes reasonable steps to improve the attendance of the small number of pupils who do not attend school regularly. These pupils’ rates of attendance are improving as a result.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Weaknesses in the delivery of the previous phonics programme mean that some pupils have gaps in their reading knowledge. This hinders how fluently and accurately these pupils read and how well some older pupils keep pace with the other subjects that they study. The school should ensure that, where there are gaps in pupils’ reading knowledge, these are quickly remedied so that pupils read with fluency and accuracy. 25 and 26 June 2024
p.3
4
In one or two subjects, the curriculums have been recently refined. Pupils have had less time to secure the essential knowledge that they need to build new learning on. The school should ensure that newly revised curriculums are implemented fully so that pupils further strengthen their knowledge in these subjects. The school has not ensured that some staff in the early years have the expertise to build on what children already know and can do. This means that some children are not as well prepared for their next steps as they could be. The school should ensure that staff are provided with suitable guidance so that they can build children’s knowledge across the early years equally well.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 25 and 26 June 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Headteacher Adam Laskey (Executive Headteacher)
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 28 November 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is a Church of England voluntary-aided school. It is part of the Diocese of Manchester. Its last section 48 inspection, for schools of a religious character, took place in June 2017. The next section 48 inspection is due from September 2025. The school is part of the Dove-Shell Federation. The executive headteacher is responsible for leading both schools in the federation. Several other leaders also work across both schools. The school operates a breakfast club. The school does not make use of alternative provision for pupils.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 25 and 26 June 2024
p.5
6
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors spoke with the executive headteacher, the deputy headteacher and other leaders in the school. An inspector spoke with a group of governors, including the chair of the governing body. An inspector spoke with a representative of the diocese and a representative of the local authority. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. An inspector observed pupils from Years 1 to 3 reading to a familiar adult. Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics and physical
p.6
6
education. They spoke with the leaders of these areas of the curriculum. Inspectors also visited lessons, looked at examples of pupils’ work, held discussions with teachers and talked with pupils. Inspectors also spoke to a sample of pupils about their learning in other areas of the curriculum. They spoke with leaders and reviewed a sample of pupils’ work in these subjects. Inspectors spoke with groups of pupils about their experiences of school. They observed pupils’ behaviour at breaktimes and in lessons. An inspector scrutinised leaders’ records of pupils’ behaviour and attendance. Inspectors spoke with parents and carers as they brought their children to school. Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for staff and for pupils.
p.6
Inspection team
Jackie Stillings, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Peter Berry Ofsted Inspector 25 and 26 June 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion