Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Co-op Academy Smithies Moor
Summary
Kathryn McDonald (lead), Alex Thorp, Andrew Knight, Zoe Lightfoot
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 Apr 2024
- Inspectors verified
Alex Thorp, Andrew Knight, Kathryn McDonald, Zoe Lightfoot
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
WF16 9BB
- Name on report verified
Co-op Academy Smithies Moor
- URN verified
147534
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school and multi-academy trust (the trust) are proud to share how they have developed strong links with their local area. p.2
- Leaders should ensure that the school’s behaviour policy is effective and implemented consistently well so that pupils understand the p.4
- Trustees and the academy governing committee are working closely with the school to embed high expectations for all pupils. p.2
- school’s high expectations and receive targeted support to help them to manage their behaviour appropriately. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 p.1
- The head of academy is Catherine Brackenbury. p.1
- This school is part of The Co-op Academies Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. p.1
- The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Dr Chris Tomlinson, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Russell Gill. p.1
- There is also an executive headteacher, Jack Sowter, who is responsible for this school and two others. 23 to 25 April 2024 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Personal development4
“The personal development of pupils is of the utmost importance to the school.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,469
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Co-op Academy Smithies Moor Leeds Old Road, Heckmondwike WF16 9BB
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The head of academy is Catherine Brackenbury. This school is part of The Co-op Academies Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Dr Chris Tomlinson, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Russell Gill. There is also an executive headteacher, Jack Sowter, who is responsible for this school and two others. 23 to 25 April 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Co-op Academy Smithies Moor has undergone a period of significant change. Pupils explained to inspectors that these changes have helped to make their school a happy place to be. Pupils achieve well, particularly at the end of key stage 2. The school and multi-academy trust (the trust) are proud to share how they have developed strong links with their local area. These links are supporting the school on their journey to becoming an ‘integral part of their local community’. Trustees and the academy governing committee are working closely with the school to embed high expectations for all pupils. Most parents and carers recognise that the school is on an improving journey.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
More recently, behaviour has improved across the school. However, there are still regular incidences of poor behaviour. Pupils say that this happens more frequently at playtime and lunchtime. Pupils know who to speak to if they are concerned. They are confident that trusted adults will keep them safe. Pupils explained that bullying does not happen often, but if it does, staff help them to resolve any worries they may have.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has a clear focus on promoting good attendance and punctuality. Attendance is slowly beginning to improve. However, the proportion of pupils who are persistently absent remains a concern. Pupils in upper key stage 2 and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are more highly represented in this group, with approximately one in three pupils persistently absent from school.
p.2
better?
Recent changes at the school have led to improvements in the English and mathematics curriculum and stronger key stage 2 outcomes. Pupils’ attainment in the phonics screening check in Year 1 has also improved and is now broadly average. However, reading, writing and mathematics outcomes at the end of key stage 1, and the key stage 2 multiplication tables check, remain low. In some classes in key stage 1, pupils’ recall lacks depth. There are too few opportunities for pupils to cover previous learning and explore and deepen their knowledge before learning something new. Despite the weaker outcomes at the end of key stage 1, pupils achieve very highly at the end of Year 6.
p.2
better?
The school’s wider curriculum is at an earlier stage of development. The school does not adapt the curriculum well enough for pupils who might need it, including pupils with SEND. Gaps in learning are not addressed quickly enough.
p.2
better?
The school and the trust have a clear vision of what they want to achieve and the action they are taking to realise this. Initial changes implemented when the school joined the trust in 2019 were slow to take root. The trust worked carefully with the school throughout this period to build a stable staff team. A new leadership team took up post in 2022. This change has increased leadership capacity and supported 23 to 25 April 2024
p.2
3
the school to undertake a much more rapid transformation. However, many of these changes are recent. They have not had enough time to become established and make a sustained, positive difference.
p.3
3
The school has created a bespoke curriculum offer, with the support of trust leaders. In early reading, this curriculum offer has been implemented with fidelity. The school has prioritised developing a love of reading in all classes. This is supporting pupils to develop their listening, vocabulary and speaking skills. More widely, the implementation of the school’s curriculum is at an earlier stage. Subject leaders acknowledge that staff require additional support to ensure that the curriculum is taught consistently well, in every class. Opportunities for pupils to revisit what they know and remember before learning something new are not well developed. In a number of subjects, misconceptions are not addressed quickly enough. This allows gaps in pupils’ learning to remain and widen in some instances.
p.3
3
The school has strengthened the support for pupils with SEND. Teachers use pupil learning passports well to help pupils with education, health and care plans meet their individual targets. However, many pupils with identified speech, language and communication needs do not receive the intervention and support that they need at an early enough stage. The school has recently introduced systems within the early years to help address this. These are in the very early stages of implementation.
p.3
3
The school is working closely with the trust to implement an early years curriculum that is ambitious and designed to prepare children well for Year 1 and beyond. Children are happy and well cared for. However, learning opportunities in the classroom are underdeveloped. They do not support children well enough to use what they already know to help them learn something new. In Reception, children can talk with confidence about their more recent learning, including the topic of minibeasts. However, opportunities for children to embed and enhance prior learning, to help deepen an understanding of the world, are limited. Further opportunities for children to participate in, or learn by using familiar routines, stories, rhymes or songs are not consistent. Staff do not regularly follow the trust approach to learning and teaching in the early years.
p.3
3
The personal development of pupils is of the utmost importance to the school. Their ‘ways of being Co-op’ align with the trust and co-operative values. The school is committed to developing an inclusive environment that celebrates difference. Pupils are increasingly confident about speaking up when they see examples of unacceptable behaviour. A small proportion of pupils continue to use inappropriate language that some refer to as ‘banter’. The school is actively addressing this through their personal, social, health and economic education lessons.
p.3
3
The school raises pupils’ aspirations of the careers they can follow in the future. Pupils have the opportunity to meet a range of professionals and ask them about their roles. There is an annual careers week. Pupils spoke with animation about their recent Dragons’ Den activity and how they can apply for different roles in school. Leaders are working towards a national accreditation for careers. 23 to 25 April 2024
p.3
4
Staff feel well supported by school leaders and the trust. They speak highly of the support and training they receive. Staff appreciate being able to access expertise from the trust’s regional team in addition to the support they receive from governors, trustees and colleagues in school. Staff feel proud to work here.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Implementation of the school’s curriculum is inconsistent. Some staff do not adapt learning to meet pupils’ varied starting points. Prior knowledge is not routinely revisited to address misconceptions or gaps in what pupils know and remember, particularly in early years and key stage 1. Consequently, pupils struggle to recall significant aspects of their learning or cannot build on what they have learned previously. The school must ensure that children and pupils in the early years and key stage 1 build on more recent improvements, similar to those at key stage 2, by regularly revisiting what they know. Furthermore, the school should adapt pupils’ learning, ensuring that activities match pupils’ different starting points. Throughout the school, some pupils, including pupils with SEND, struggle to moderate their behaviour. Leaders should ensure that the school’s behaviour policy is effective and implemented consistently well so that pupils understand the
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
school’s high expectations and receive targeted support to help them to manage their behaviour appropriately.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at 23 to 25 April 2024
p.4
5
any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 23 to 25 April 2024
p.5
School details
Website www.smithiesmoor.coopacademies.co.uk
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.6
Information about this school
Co-op Academy Smithies Moor converted to become an academy in November 2019. When its predecessor school, The John Curwen Co-operative Primary Academy, was last inspected by Ofsted it was judged to be inadequate overall. The academy is one of 32 schools in The Co-op Academies Trust. There have been significant changes in leadership at the school in recent years. The executive headteacher was appointed to work with the school from September 2022. The head of academy and deputy headteacher took up post in September 2022. The academy does not currently use alternative provision. The academy runs a breakfast club and after-school clubs for pupils who attend the academy.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 23 to 25 April 2024
p.6
7
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the head of academy, the executive headteacher and the deputy headteacher, who is also the special educational needs coordinator. Inspectors also met with a range of representatives from the trust, including the regional director, the chair of the board of trustees and the chair of the academy regional council. The lead inspector held an online meeting with the chief executive officer. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils
p.7
7
about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector also observed some pupils reading to a familiar adult. Inspectors also spoke to leaders about the curriculum in art and design, design and technology, geography and science. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and at other times around school. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The views of parents were considered through the responses to Ofsted Parent View and parent questionnaire. An inspector also spoke to parents during the inspection. The views of staff and pupils were considered through responses to surveys and through discussions with them. The inspection started on 23 April 2024. It was paused on 24 April 2024 in line
p.7
7
with Ofsted inspections and visits: Deferring, pausing and gathering additional evidence policy. Inspectors returned on 25 April 2024 to complete the inspection.
p.7
Inspection team
Kathryn McDonald, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Alex Thorp His Majesty’s Inspector 23 to 25 April 2024
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion