Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Peel Hall Primary School
Summary
Liz Dayton (lead), Haroon Asghar, Stephanie Swift
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Jun 2024
- Inspectors verified
Haroon Asghar, Liz Dayton, Stephanie Swift
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
M38 0BZ
- Name on report verified
Peel Hall Primary School
- URN verified
105913
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Consequently, teachers are unclear about what knowledge pupils should learn and when it should be taught. p.2
- As a result, some pupils, including those with SEND, do not learn as effectively as they should. p.2
- The important knowledge that pupils should learn in these subjects has not been identified clearly enough. p.2
- In some subjects, the curriculum does not clearly identify the knowledge that pupils should learn, or the order that this should be taught. p.3
- Pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), do not achieve as well as they should. p.2
- The school should ensure that all subjects have appropriate assessment systems that support teachers to identify and rectify gaps in pupils’ knowledge effectively. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance3
“Governors have a clear vision for the school and fulfil their responsibilities well.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,043
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Peel Hall Primary School Greencourt Drive, Worsley, Manchester M38 0BZ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 4 and 5 June 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ well-being is placed at the heart of Peel Hall. They are greeted by staff with warmth and positivity from the moment that they arrive. Pupils, including children in the early years, spoke highly of the care and support that they receive. Pupils are very happy at this school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils benefit from an ambitious curriculum. The school has strengthened pupils’ learning in some subjects, including reading and mathematics, since the previous inspection. However, many other subject curriculums are not designed and delivered as well as they should be. Pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), do not achieve as well as they should.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils understand the school’s well-established rules and routines. They behave well in lessons and at social times. For example, pupils line up beautifully in the dinner hall and respond quickly and politely to their teachers’ requests.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy contributing to the school and to the wider community. They spoke proudly about their roles as pupil governors and how they look after the local environment as ‘Peel protectors’. Pupils, including those with SEND, enjoy a range of extra-curricular activities such as football, tennis and gymnastics.
p.2
better?
Since the previous inspection, the school has experienced considerable changes to its leadership and staffing. The school has recently developed its curriculum to strengthen the breadth and depth of pupils’ learning. It has considered staff’s workload and well-being carefully when introducing these changes. However, some subject curriculums have not been finalised. The important knowledge that pupils should learn in these subjects has not been identified clearly enough. Consequently, teachers are unclear about what knowledge pupils should learn and when it should be taught. This limits pupils’ learning in these subjects.
p.2
better?
The school has not checked that the curriculum, in subjects other than English and mathematics, is implemented as intended. Furthermore, it has not ensured that staff have the knowledge and expertise that they need to deliver the curriculum well. As a result, some pupils, including those with SEND, do not learn as effectively as they should.
p.2
better?
In some subjects, the school has established effective assessment and monitoring systems. This enables the school to evaluate the impact of the curriculum on pupils’ learning and to identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge. However, these systems are not securely in place across the wider curriculum. As a result, staff do not identify and address gaps in pupils’ knowledge as well as they should.
p.2
better?
The school has ensured that reading is a high priority. Staff have been trained in the newly implemented phonics programme, which is delivered from the beginning of 4 and 5 June 2024
p.2
3
the Reception class. Prior to this, children in the Nursery class enjoy listening to a range of books, stories and rhymes which prepare them well for learning to read. The school checks pupils’ progress through the phonics programme carefully. Pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, who struggle with reading, are identified swiftly. They receive appropriate support. This helps to ensure that most pupils become confident, fluent readers.
p.3
3
The school has strengthened its processes for identifying the additional needs of pupils. Staff know pupils with SEND well and ensure that they receive appropriate support. This includes making suitable adaptations to the delivery of the curriculum so that pupils with SEND access the same learning as their peers.
p.3
3
Staff consistently manage pupils’ behaviour well and ensure that learning is not disrupted. Pupils enjoy their lessons and they work hard. They interact positively with each other at social times and are well mannered as they move around the school.
p.3
3
The school ensures that parents, carers and pupils are aware of the importance of regular attendance at school, including in the early years. Staff liaise with families and other professionals to identify, and to overcome, barriers to pupils’ attendance. The school’s appropriate actions have reduced the proportion of pupils who are persistently absent.
p.3
3
The school supports pupils’ wider development effectively. Pupils are taught life skills including cooking and first aid. They learn about the importance of diversity and of respecting the views of others. Pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain.
p.3
3
Governors have a clear vision for the school and fulfil their responsibilities well. They have worked closely with the local authority to ensure that the school has the capacity to improve.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some subjects, the curriculum does not clearly identify the knowledge that pupils should learn, or the order that this should be taught. This limits teachers’ ability to help pupils to learn well. The school should ensure that the important knowledge that pupils will learn and the order that this should be taught is identified clearly. In some subjects, the school has not ensured that staff deliver the intended curriculum effectively. This hinders some pupils, including those with SEND, from 4 and 5 June 2024
p.3
4
learning as well as they should. The school should ensure that staff are suitably equipped to deliver the curriculum consistently well. In many subjects, the school has not established effective assessment systems to check pupils’ learning. As a result, the school does not identify and address gaps in pupils’ knowledge sufficiently well. The school should ensure that all subjects have appropriate assessment systems that support teachers to identify and rectify gaps in pupils’ knowledge effectively.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘ disadvantaged pupils ’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 4 and 5 June 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 28 and 29 June 2022, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school has experienced considerable changes to leadership and staffing since the previous inspection. This includes the appointment of a new headteacher. The chair of governors has taken up her role since the previous inspection. The school makes use of one unregistered alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 4 and 5 June 2024
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation. Inspectors met with the headteacher, other leaders, governors and a range of staff at the school. The lead inspector met with a representative from the local authority. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: mathematics, geography, science, art and design and English, including early reading. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and
p.6
6
considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The lead inspector listened to pupils read to a trusted adult. Inspectors observed pupils at breaktime, lunchtime and when moving around the school. Inspectors spoke to some parents on the playground and considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. There were no responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for staff and for pupils. Inspectors met with groups of pupils throughout the inspection to gather their views about school life. The inspectors reviewed a range of documents, including those related to the governance of the school.
p.6
Inspection team
Liz Dayton, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Stephanie Swift Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 June 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion