Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Ermington Primary School
Summary
Leanne Thirlby (lead), Craig Hayes
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Jun 2024
- Inspectors verified
Craig Hayes, Leanne Thirlby
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Outstanding
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
PL21 9NH
- Name on report verified
Ermington Primary School
- URN verified
148871
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentOutstanding
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is the result of the highly effective provision for their wider, personal development, which builds on a secure academic education. p.2
- They value what this gives them to enable them to learn successfully and meet the high expectations staff have of them. p.2
- Pupils flourish at Ermington Primary School. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Consequently, these pupils do not get the precise learning they need to achieve the best possible outcomes. p.3
- The trust must ensure that there is a clear and intentional design for those pupils who require further practice and consolidation at a deeper level of understanding and 25 and 26 June 2024 p.3
- It gives pupils what they need to prepare them for a fulfilling future and to be confident, self-aware participants in their chosen communities. p.2
- Teachers have the knowledge they need to provide pupils with the necessary support to be successful learners. p.3
- The trust should work to ensure that all subjects are as successful and embedded as they are where the curriculum is at its strongest. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics6
“Pupils have a love of reading.” p.3SEND & inclusion5
“This is an inclusive school.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,244
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Ermington Primary School School Road, Ermington, Ivybridge, Devon PL21 9NH
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Outstanding Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The headteacher of this school is Mark Mitchell. This school is part of Westcountry Schools Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Rob Haring, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Iain Grafton.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Ofsted has not previously inspected Ermington Primary School as an academy under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 as, until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection of the predecessor school. 25 and 26 June 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils flourish at Ermington Primary School. They epitomise the school values of care, pride and resilience. This is the result of the highly effective provision for their wider, personal development, which builds on a secure academic education.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Younger pupils view the older pupils as positive role models. Older pupils take pride in their responsibilities, which makes a difference to the school and their peers. Community and a sense of belonging is at the heart of this school. It gives pupils what they need to prepare them for a fulfilling future and to be confident, self-aware participants in their chosen communities.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils attend well because they want to be in school. Relationships are strong and nurturing. Pupils say that the best thing about the school is the staff and how well they know them. They value what this gives them to enable them to learn successfully and meet the high expectations staff have of them.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Parents and carers agree with their children’s high praise for the school. They praise the dedication of staff to increase their children’s social and emotional development. Parents appreciate the impact this has on their children so that they can follow the ambitious aspirations the school encourages and supports them to have.
p.2
better?
The school has an ambitious curriculum in place. Links are made across subjects, and aspects to strengthen pupils’ wider development are well represented. The successes of the curriculum begin from the very start with children in Reception. The Reception class space is designed to increase children’s motor skills and personal, social skills, as well as the foundations for literacy and early mathematics. Staff promote children’s curiosity through purposeful interactions. Children work together in different learning activities and persevere to solve problems successfully. Children are advancing, with increasing success, towards the demands of the Year 1 curriculum.
p.2
better?
In many subjects, the curriculum is designed to revisit prior learning regularly and build new learning well. For example, the 10 teaching techniques, used as part of the history curriculum, help pupils to remember the curriculum over time. However, the school is alert to the fact that some pupils could achieve even better. There is not always sufficient focus and attention to ensure pupils spend enough time deepening their learning.
p.2
better?
The core subjects of mathematics and reading, as well as wider curriculum subjects, such as history and art and design, are examples of where the school’s curriculum is well established. Pupils learn successfully, achieve well and enthuse about their learning in these subjects. In a few subjects, however, the curriculum is newer in its development or being revised. Consequently, it does not make the same impact on pupils’ learning or their enjoyment of the subject. 25 and 26 June 2024
p.2
3
Pupils have a love of reading. They read widely and often from a rich range of high- quality texts. Pupils quickly become reading experts as they move through the school. At the earliest stages of reading, pupils learn the sounds they need, to read with increasing accuracy.
p.3
3
This is an inclusive school. The needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are identified quickly. Teachers have the knowledge they need to provide pupils with the necessary support to be successful learners. However, some pupils with SEND do not benefit from enough precision about how potential barriers to learning could be reduced or removed, for example making sure that there is clarity about the best support to enable pupils to learn with increasing independence.
p.3
3
Central to pupils’ education is the school’s determination for pupils to be well- rounded and well-prepared individuals for the next stage and beyond. Pupils behave well and have positive attitudes to learning. Supporting this is the school’s design of its personal development programme. There is a clear strategy and purpose to how it is delivered. The school ensures that pupils learn about life far beyond the communities in which they live. Pupils embrace difference and diversity. It is woven through the taught curriculum and the opportunities afforded to pupils. These include residential trips for pupils in Year 3 to Year 6 covering varied experiences, such as visiting London, performances, including the Prom, and a rich and wide range of clubs and curriculum enrichment. Pupils talk, with impressive confidence, about the importance of mental health and keeping themselves safe. They are highly motivated to speak up and speak out. Pupils learn about the world of work
p.3
3
and start to consider the future paths they may take.
p.3
3
The quality of the educational offer is overseen effectively by the wider trust. The school is held to account so that those responsible for governance have the assurances they need that pupils at Ermington Primary School are getting the education they deserve.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
For a minority of pupils, there is not enough specificity and explicit design to deepen learning or reduce barriers to learning. Consequently, these pupils do not get the precise learning they need to achieve the best possible outcomes. The trust must ensure that there is a clear and intentional design for those pupils who require further practice and consolidation at a deeper level of understanding and 25 and 26 June 2024
p.3
4
those who need adaptations to overcome barriers to learning because of their SEND. Some subjects are not as developed and embedded as others. Where this is the case, the design and the assessment of the curriculum does not make the best possible impact on how well pupils learn. Furthermore, pupils do not enthuse about these subjects as much as they do where the curriculum is well designed and inspires them. The trust should work to ensure that all subjects are as successful and embedded as they are where the curriculum is at its strongest.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with SEND; pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 25 and 26 June 2024
p.4
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
The school joined Westcountry Schools Trust in January 2022. The trust is responsible for a group of primary and secondary schools across Devon, Plymouth and Cornwall. The school is a smaller-than-average primary school. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 25 and 26 June 2024
p.5
6
Inspectors met with the headteacher, the special educational needs coordinator, subject leaders and the school improvement partner. In addition, an inspector met with the chair of trustees and the director of education. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders and trust leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers and pupils and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects. An inspector listened to pupils in Years 1, 2 and 3 read to a familiar adult. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.
p.6
6
Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school site. Inspectors analysed school documentation, including leaders’ evaluations and plans for improvement. Inspectors scrutinised a range of policies and procedures, including those that relate to the curriculum, SEND, safeguarding and behaviour. An inspector listened to the views of parents at the beginning of the second day of the inspection. Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted Parent View and the free-text comments. Inspectors evaluated responses to Ofsted’s staff and pupil survey.
p.6
Inspection team
Leanne Thirlby, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Craig Hayes Ofsted Inspector 25 and 26 June 2024
p.6
7
and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion