Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

University of Bristol

Inspected 13 Jun 2024 · published 18 Jul 2024 · URN 70006

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lydia Pride (lead), Emily Henry, Kelly Olive, Rachel Hesketh, Susan Aykin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Jun 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Emily Henry, Kelly Olive, Lydia Pride, Rachel Hesketh, Susan Aykin

  • Postcode verified

    BS8 1JA

  • Name on report verified

    University of Bristol

  • URN verified

    70006

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongwell preparedoutstandinghigh expectationsflourishconfidentrigorousknowledgeable
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
798
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%About the inspection 48%

Full report text

University of Bristol School of Education, 35 Berkely Square, Bristol BS8 1JA Inspection dates 10 to 13 June 2024

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education and training Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

The University of Bristol has a strong reputation for training subject experts who are confident to teach across the secondary phase, including in post-16 provision. A rigorous approach to assessment identifies any gaps in trainees’ subject knowledge. Expectations are high that trainees will strengthen their knowledge, and they take pride in doing so.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Knowledgeable and experienced tutors within the university’s School of Education provide trainees with personalised support. These professionals are readily available to support trainees with any difficulties. Programme leaders adjust the course requirements to keep workload manageable. The university offers specialist support for trainees’ mental health and well-being.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Great care is taken to match trainees to their placement schools and the ‘associate tutors’ who provide mentoring. This helps to ensure that trainees have the opportunities and expert support they need to be successful. Communication between the centre and partner schools is strong. Trainee experiences in placement schools are consistently positive.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees learn how to teach engaging lessons and promote good behaviour. Some trainees deepen their understanding of special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and behaviour management by undertaking a short placement in a specialist setting. This is often a highly motivating experience which shapes trainees’ future career plans.

p.1

Information about this ITE provider

◼ The University of Bristol provides teacher training for the secondary phase (11 to 18). All trainees gain experience teaching students in post-16 provision. ◼ There are 122 trainees enrolled in the academic year 2023/24. This includes a core group of 112 trainees who were recruited by the provider and a further 10 trainees recruited by schools as part of the School Direct (fee-paying) route. There are two School Direct partners: North Somerset Teaching Alliance and Cathedral Schools Trust. ◼ All trainees complete a Postgraduate Certificate in Education alongside the programmes leading to the award of qualified teacher status. ◼ The provider works with 46 partnership schools in the Bristol area and some further afield. In their most recent Ofsted inspection, most partner schools were judged good or outstanding. A small number were judged requires improvement or inadequate. Some schools are inspected by the Independent Schools Inspectorate.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ The inspection team included four of His Majesty’s Inspectors and one Ofsted Inspector. ◼ Inspectors met with programme and curriculum leaders from the university, as well as managers responsible for administrating and running the programme. The lead inspector met with the head of the school of education and two members of the partnership board. These parties are responsible for governance. ◼ Inspectors spoke with headteachers, professional tutors and ‘associate tutors’ (mentors) from partner schools. ◼ Focused reviews were carried out in each of the subjects offered. This included science, English, history, geography, mathematics, modern foreign languages and religious education. ◼ Inspectors visited 11 partner schools and conducted focused review activities with one school remotely. Inspectors also spoke with school-based staff who were attending conferences and training events at the university. ◼ Inspectors spoke with 30 trainees and 21 early career teachers. Inspection activities

p.2

Information about this inspection

considered the experiences of trainees in School Direct partner schools as well as trainees following the core programme. ◼ Inspectors spoke with three providers who host placements in specialist settings during the ‘extension’ phase of the programme. ◼ Inspectors considered a range of documentation, including information about governance, safeguarding arrangements, trainee placements, the ITE curriculum, training resources and materials. Inspectors considered the responses to the surveys for trainees and staff.

p.2

better?

Trainees benefit from the university’s strong research tradition. For example, the School of Education contributes to the research field on how children learn and shares insights with trainees as part of the curriculum. Subject tutors are active researchers, giving trainees access to new and developing ideas, which they assimilate confidently.

p.3

better?

All trainees gain substantial experience of teaching students in post-16. This helps to deepen their subject knowledge. Trainees are well prepared to teach GCSE and A-level qualifications and understand how assessment works in their subject. Trainees also consider what pupils learn in the primary phase. This helps them to appreciate the full scope of their subject and how children build up knowledge and skills over time.

p.3

better?

The curriculum is designed so that trainees cover and revisit learning from the core content framework. They begin the course considering the role of classroom routines in promoting good behaviour and then build on their behaviour management skills through classroom practice. The provider enriches the curriculum by including projects on issues such as representation and education for sustainability. Trainees appreciate the currency of these themes and consider the implications for their subjects.

p.3

better?

Trainees gain knowledge of inclusion and approaches to support disadvantaged pupils, including those with SEND. Those who undertake specialist placements gain particularly deep insights. However, more widely, trainees do not apply their learning in this area as skilfully as they could. They understand how to present new information clearly and accessibly, but do not routinely refine their approaches with individual pupils.

p.3

better?

The provider maintains high expectations of trainees by challenging them to meet ‘moving targets’ as they progress through the course. The provider recruits, trains and supports an effective team of mentors. These ‘associate tutors’ play a key role in assessing trainees and helping them to meet expectations. Graduates from the programme flourish, with some undertaking leadership roles. They are well prepared for the role of a teacher, including their safeguarding responsibilities.

p.3

better?

The work of schools to raise aspiration and widen participation in higher education is enhanced by the provider. It acts as a hub through which local teachers access professional development. During an ‘extension phase’, trainees practise being curriculum designers, adding to curriculums in their placement schools. All of this helps to secure the strong reputation of the provider in Bristol.

p.3

better?

There is a well-established culture of listening to and acting on the views of trainees. As a result, the provider has a good understanding of the trainee experience and uses this to improve the programme. Nonetheless, the information gathered from quality assurance activities does not always help to ensure that a full and accurate picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the provision is held at the strategic level.

p.3

(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)

◼ Trainees are well prepared to make learning accessible to a broad range of pupils, but they do not often refine their approach for individuals where it is appropriate to do so. The provider should support trainees to adapt their teaching more precisely to help pupils overcome any barriers to their learning. ◼ Leaders at the strategic level do not hold a sharp picture of the quality of provision. The provider should ensure that quality assurance processes reliably identify the key aspects of the provision to focus on improving.

p.4

compliance criteria?

The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.

p.4

ITE provider details

This inspection was carried out in accordance with the initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook , which sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.

p.5

ITE provider details

Type of ITE provider Higher education institution Phases provided Secondary Date of previous inspection 30 April and 12 November 2018

p.5

Inspection team

Lydia Pride, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Emily Henry Ofsted Inspector Kelly Olive His Majesty’s Inspector Rachel Hesketh His Majesty’s Inspector Susan Aykin His Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Annex: Placement schools and colleges

Inspectors visited the following schools and colleges as part of this inspection:

p.6

Name URN ITE phase

Backwell School 132005 Secondary Bristol Cathedral Choir School 109368 Secondary Bristol Free School 136822 Secondary Bristol Grammar School 109369 Secondary Churchill Academy & Sixth Form 137000 Secondary Clifton College 109334 Secondary Cotham School 137440 Secondary Fairfield High School 141705 Secondary Montpelier High School 135581 Secondary Richard Huish College 130808 Secondary St Bernadette Catholic Secondary School 109331 Secondary Wellsway School 137523 Secondary guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Name URN ITE phase

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.7

Name URN ITE phase

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Name URN ITE phase

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Name URN ITE phase

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion