Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Castor CofE Primary School
Summary
Jonny Wallace (lead), Julie Harrison
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 Jun 2024
- Inspectors verified
Jonny Wallace, Julie Harrison
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
PE5 7AY
- Name on report verified
Castor CofE Primary School
- URN verified
110824
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance11
“There have been several changes in leadership and inconsistencies in staffing over time.” p.2Reading & phonics3
“The early reading curriculum is strong.” p.2Personal development3
“Pupils benefit from a range of high-quality enrichment experiences.” p.2Progress & outcomes3
“As a result, children in early years achieve well.” p.2Teaching & assessment2
“A clear teaching approach now sets clear expectations.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,040
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 12 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Castor CofE Primary School Stocks Hill, Castor, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire PE5 7AY
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 19 and 20 June 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils at Castor CofE Primary School are happy and enjoy learning. They are benefiting from the recently revised curriculum and a positive learning experience.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Following a period of change, pupils are settled at this school. They love learning and demonstrate positive learning behaviours. Pupils revel in the chance to share their learning. For example, pupils eagerly shared their recent Roman history learning about their school site.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Behaviour is strong. Pupils strive to receive weekly rewards. Pupils enjoy a range of activities in the playground. They collaborate and support each other in a friendly manner.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The social and emotional needs of pupils are a priority. Pupils feel safe. They use the school’s Bee Box to share any worries they might have. They know that an adult will be there to talk to. Some pupils visit The Hive, where they can take a break or receive bespoke support to ensure they are ready to learn.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils benefit from a range of high-quality enrichment experiences. Planned trips, visits and outdoor learning activities enhance the curriculum. Pupils also speak with pride about their roles of responsibility, such as becoming school councillors and sports ambassadors. These opportunities add value to pupils’ learning and development.
p.2
better?
There have been several changes in leadership and inconsistencies in staffing over time. During this unsettled period, the curriculum was not developed effectively. Pupils did not achieve well. Published outcomes in 2023 reflect this. However, this academic year, rapid improvement has taken place. School leaders have worked at pace to establish clear systems and processes. The quality of education is a focus and a carefully planned curriculum now identifies what pupils learn. Pupils are now learning key knowledge successfully. The whole school community recognises this positive change.
p.2
better?
Children make an excellent start in early years. Staff work closely with pre-school settings so they know the children before they arrive. Staff use this information to plan the curriculum to meet children’s specific needs. As a result, children in early years achieve well. They are very well prepared for Year 1.
p.2
better?
The early reading curriculum is strong. Pupils start learning as soon as they start in Reception. Leaders have implemented the early reading curriculum well. They check it regularly to ensure a consistent approach and it is being taught as leaders intend. Adults check how well pupils are learning to read. Any pupil who falls behind is supported to catch up. As a result, pupils learn to read with fluency and confidence. 19 and 20 June 2024
p.2
3
In English, leaders have prioritised improving pupils’ writing across the curriculum. A clear teaching approach now sets clear expectations. Pupils practise their writing across the curriculum. In English, pupils are writing to a good standard. Their spelling and grammar are typically accurate and they are achieving well. On occasion, the same expectations are not consistent across other curriculum subjects. Errors often go unchecked in these subjects. Leaders are working hard to ensure writing is of the same high standard in all subjects.
p.3
3
In a few subjects, curriculum approaches are new or recently refined. In these subjects, pupils do not have a secure understanding of important content over time. Checking strategies to ensure that gaps in learning are identified are not secure. Staff do not routinely check pupils’ prior knowledge. Curriculum content is not always adapted to fill any gaps in knowledge that pupils have.
p.3
3
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are well catered for. A new leader has supported staff to create plans which specifically identify pupils’ barriers to learning. Staff adapt the learning to remove these barriers. Pupils with SEND typically access the same curriculum as their peers.
p.3
3
Clear expectations of behaviour are established. Leaders recognise the need for consistency in the way behaviour is managed. Staff manage behaviour in line with school expectations. Learning proceeds without interruption.
p.3
3
There is careful consideration of pupils’ personal development. Pupils learn about online safety and understand how to keep themselves physically and mentally healthy. All pupils can develop their talents and interests beyond the academic curriculum. For example, they participate regularly in local community events. Pupils also enjoy attending clubs, such as chess and football.
p.3
3
Governors understand their duties well. Many are new to their role, but they are well trained. They provide effective support and challenge to school leaders.
p.3
3
During the recent changes, staff well-being has been at the heart of leaders’ actions. Staff feel valued and proud to work at this school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In subjects where the curriculum is new or recently refined, pupils have gaps in their knowledge. This makes it hard for pupils to access new learning and build their knowledge over time. The school should ensure that staff routinely plan to 19 and 20 June 2024
p.3
4
assess pupils’ prior knowledge before introducing new content. This will enable them to adjust planning to fill any gaps in knowledge. Pupils’ application of their writing skills across the curriculum is not always as strong as it needs to be. Pupils do not spell or use appropriate grammar well enough across all subjects. Leaders must continue to implement and monitor their approach to writing in English across all subjects. This will ensure pupils are able to use their writing effectively to demonstrate what they know and remember clearly.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 19 and 20 June 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 12 September 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher was not in school at the time of inspection. An acting headteacher has been in post since October 2023. The schools runs its own before- and after-school provision. The school does not make use of any providers of alternative provision. The school is part of the Diocese of Peterborough. Its last inspection of its denominational education, under section 48 of the Education Act 2005, took place in November 2016. The next section 48 inspection will occur within eight years of this date.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 19 and 20 June 2024
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors held meetings with the acting headteacher, school leaders, subject leaders, staff, members of the governing body, a representative from the local authority and a representative from the diocese. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, physical education and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector also listened to pupils read with a familiar member of staff.
p.6
6
Inspectors also considered other curriculum documentation and considered pupils’ writing across the curriculum. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors reviewed a range of documents, including behaviour logs, attendance records, pupil records, records of governing body meetings, school development plans and school self-evaluation documents. The inspection team considered the views of parents and carers through responses to Ofsted Parent View and through speaking to parents during the inspection. Inspectors gathered the views of pupils and staff through Ofsted’s pupil and staff surveys, as well as interviews and discussions conducted throughout the
p.6
Inspection team
Jonny Wallace, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Julie Harrison Ofsted Inspector 19 and 20 June 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion