Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Leicester City Council

Inspected 15 May 2024 · published 16 Jul 2024 · URN 52994

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sarah Houghton (lead), Nikki Brady, Russ Henry, Vicki Locke

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 May 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Nikki Brady, Russ Henry, Sarah Houghton, Vicki Locke

  • Name on report verified

    Short inspection of Leicester City Council

  • URN verified

    52994

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongeffectivelyhigh expectationssupportiveenjoypositiveimproved
Criticismnot alwaystoo lownot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionSafeguardingWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings647w+67
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve26w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
677
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Safeguarding 1%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 42%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

Short inspection of Leicester City Council

p.1

Outcome

Leicester City Council continues to be a good provider.

p.1

Information about this provider

Leaders currently have 3,784 learners across their adult and community learning provision. Around half of the courses are taught at the college and the rest across smaller venues in Leicester, including Bishopdale adult learning hub. There are 1,211 learners on accredited courses which range from pre-entry to level 4. Most learners study English for speakers of other languages (ESOL), English, mathematics, accounts, digital and working with children and adults.

p.1

Information about this provider

There are 2,573 learners on non-accredited adult and community learning courses. These courses focus on areas such as arts, mental health and well-being, digital inclusion and family learning. Leaders have a clear focus on providing high-quality adult education and community learning for Leicester residents from some of the most economically disadvantaged areas of the city.

p.1

Information about this provider

The provider was last inspected in 2018 and graded good.

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Leaders have high expectations for their learners. They provide a suitably broad range of courses to meet the needs of their local area.

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Tutors are highly supportive and nurture their learners. Learners rightly appreciate this and feel included and safe in their learning environments. Learners enjoy their courses.

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Tutors use effective strategies to help learners gain skills that enable them to grow in confidence. ESOL learners are now able to communicate housing issues to landlords. English learners develop their understanding of everyday concepts. They can read for pleasure and are better equipped to support their children’s education.

p.1

What is it like to be a learner with this provider?

Leaders have a strong focus on developing learners’ sense of citizenship. Learners take part in a range of useful volunteering opportunities that help to integrate them into the community. 14 and 15 May 2024

p.1

better?

Leaders understand well the challenges and complex barriers that many of their learners face. They support learners effectively to make their return to education a positive experience.

p.2

better?

Leaders work closely with stakeholders to understand their needs and plan their course offer. They effectively scrutinise labour market information and know the current requirements of local employers. Leaders have good relationships with partners. This assists them to run courses in some of the hardest-to-reach areas of the city.

p.2

better?

Learners with special educational needs and/or disabilities access a range of suitable support mechanisms such as in-class support staff, accessibility tools and individual learning resources. This additional support helps them to progress well.

p.2

better?

Leaders and tutors organise the curriculum logically, so learners grasp basic principles well before they move on to more complex topics. Pottery learners start by making pinch pots, which helps them to develop a feel for the different types of clay. This then helps them with subsequent techniques used when working with coils, slabs, moulds and turning.

p.2

better?

Tutors provide effective verbal feedback in classes that helps learners to improve what they know and can do. They monitor learners’ work and encourage them to think carefully. Tutors give useful tips about how learners can improve their work, for example in functional skills English, how to underline or highlight key language features.

p.2

better?

Tutors develop comprehensive learning plans for their learners with clear starting points and areas for development. Learners on ‘Remit’ courses have detailed and well-utilised personal learning plans that stay with them across their personalised course. However, on other courses, learners’ starting points are not always used as well to inform teaching to help learners progress more swiftly.

p.2

better?

Leaders have taken well-thought-out actions to address courses where achievement was too low in the previous year. For example, on digital courses, there is now an improved approach to initial assessment and more focus on ways to build ESOL learners’ grasp of technical vocabulary.

p.2

better?

Learners benefit from detailed careers information. Careers guidance is provided by well-qualified and highly experienced staff. They provide helpful advice and guidance to learners wanting to progress on to their next stage of education, training or employment.

p.2

better?

Leaders have established a culture of continuous improvement. They take swift and appropriate action to raise standards. Leaders have recently implemented a ‘grow 14 and 15 May 2024

p.2

3

our own’ approach to teachers to build resilience in their teaching staff base. This has been successful in mathematics and is now being used in other areas.

p.3

3

Leaders have a strong focus on improving attendance and rightly recognise that reporting mechanisms have not been effective enough. They have recently implemented a new data monitoring system. There is an improving picture as a result.

p.3

3

There are effective arrangements for governance and external scrutiny of provision. Board members have a good understanding of strengths and remaining areas for improvement. Leaders value the scrutiny and challenge from board members that drives standards such as ensuring a closer focus on performance data and impact.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

What does the provider need to do to improve?

 Fully establish new data reporting mechanisms for attendance.  Use learners’ starting points effectively to plan teaching on all courses. 14 and 15 May 2024

p.3

Provider details

Address 2 Wellington Street Leicester LE1 6HL

p.4

Provider details

Provider type Community Learning and Skills - Local Authority

p.4

Provider details

Date of previous inspection 20 February 2018

p.4

Provider details

Main subcontractors None 14 and 15 May 2024

p.4

Information about this inspection

The inspection was the second short inspection carried out since Leicester City Council was judged to be good in 2013.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the head of service, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including visiting learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.

p.5

Inspection team

Sarah Houghton, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Vicki Locke His Majesty’s Inspector Nikki Brady His Majesty’s Inspector Russ Henry His Majesty’s Inspector 14 and 15 May 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion