Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Millbrook School
Summary
Nick Rudman (lead), James Puxley
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 May 2024
- Inspectors verified
James Puxley, Nick Rudman
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
EN8 9BX
- Name on report verified
Millbrook School
- URN verified
117379
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2020.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, weaknesses in the quality of education over time mean that some pupils have gaps in their learning. p.2
- Pupils’ knowledge is not checked rigorously, so gaps in their knowledge are not always identified and addressed. p.2
- However, inconsistencies in previous approaches mean that some pupils still have gaps in their knowledge of how to read. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- These pupils are not as well prepared for the next stage of their education as they should be. p.2
- This means that some pupils do not develop a secure enough understanding and do not achieve as well as they should. p.3
- They are not as fluent or accurate readers as they should be. p.3
- However, some staff do not yet have the knowledge they need to adapt the curriculum so that all pupils with SEND can access it successfully. p.2
- ensure that all teachers have the knowledge and skills they need to implement the curriculum well across all subjects. p.4
- The school must ensure that assessment is used effectively to check what pupils know and remember across all subjects. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Curriculum17
“Staff deliver the curriculum very well.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,024
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Millbrook School Gews Corner, Cheshunt, Waltham Cross, Hertfordshire EN8 9BX
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 8 and 9 May 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy coming to school. Staff greet them warmly every day. Pupils make every effort to follow the school motto of ‘Believe and Achieve’. The school’s values include inspiring and respecting others. These underpin the positive relationships pupils have with each other. Pupils are happy. They say that their teachers care about them. This helps them feel safe.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils follow a broad, increasingly ambitious curriculum. The curriculum is now designed to meet the needs of all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). However, weaknesses in the quality of education over time mean that some pupils have gaps in their learning. These pupils are not as well prepared for the next stage of their education as they should be.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils generally behave well in lessons and at playtimes. They are thoughtful and well mannered. Pupils feel proud when their good behaviour is recognised. They delight in the rewards they receive, including house points for behaving well and working hard.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils excel in their various roles and responsibilities. These include acting as junior ambassadors, eco-warriors and house captains. Pupils contribute to school life through these roles, including leading a project about school meals.
p.2
better?
The school recognised that not enough pupils were achieving well in English and mathematics. The school prioritised staff training in these subjects. Curriculum plans are now clear. Consequently, in these subjects, pupils typically experience lessons where explanations build on what they know. The activities they complete help them to demonstrate and deepen their understanding.
p.2
better?
In other subjects, leaders have developed clear curriculum plans. However, the curriculum is not implemented effectively. Pupils’ knowledge is not checked rigorously, so gaps in their knowledge are not always identified and addressed. Sometimes, pupils do not have the understanding they need to successfully complete activities in class. This means that, in some subjects, pupils’ learning is insecure.
p.2
better?
Pupils with SEND are fully included in the life of the school. Their needs are effectively identified. However, some staff do not yet have the knowledge they need to adapt the curriculum so that all pupils with SEND can access it successfully.
p.2
better?
Recent improvements to provision in the Reception Year mean that children are now getting off to a positive start. Staff deliver the curriculum very well. They have designed a curriculum that is well suited to children’s needs and interests. Staff have carefully redesigned the environment to support children’s achievement across the curriculum. Adults ensure that activities follow children’s interests. Staff interact 8 and 9 May 2024
p.2
3
extensively with children, effectively supporting them to become creative and curious. Children in the Reception Year are therefore increasingly well prepared for key stage 1.
p.3
3
The school has prioritised reading. Pupils relish reading a wide range of books available to them. They enjoy listening to adults enthusiastically read carefully chosen books to them. Children in the Reception Year and pupils in key stage 1 have a secure knowledge of phonics. However, inconsistencies in previous approaches mean that some pupils still have gaps in their knowledge of how to read. They are not as fluent or accurate readers as they should be. The school is addressing these gaps through an improved programme of support.
p.3
3
Leaders have raised expectations about behaviour across the school. Staff regularly remind pupils about classroom rules and explain their importance. Consequently, pupils typically behave sensibly in lessons. They have positive attitudes to learning. Most pupils attend school well.
p.3
3
The school extends pupils’ learning beyond the classroom. Well-considered trips, such as to an aquarium or a local museum, complement the curriculum and broaden pupils’ experiences. Pupils learn about decision-making and managing their feelings and emotions. This helps them to stay safe and consider their well-being. Pupils develop their talents and interests through various clubs and a range of sports.
p.3
3
Governors have recently made good use of training and support to develop an accurate view of the challenges facing the school. The school has made important decisions that have increased leadership capacity and enhanced the curriculum. However, many changes are yet to be embedded fully. Leaders understand where improvements are still required to ensure all pupils achieve consistently well.
p.3
3
The school is attentive to the impact of changes on staff workload and well-being. Leaders seek the views of staff and consider how best to implement new initiatives without overburdening colleagues. Consequently, staff feel valued and well supported.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
There are inconsistencies in the effectiveness of the implementation of the curriculum, especially in foundation subjects. Learning activities are not always well enough designed, adapted or delivered to meet the needs of pupils, including pupils with SEND. This means that some pupils do not develop a secure enough understanding and do not achieve as well as they should. The school should 8 and 9 May 2024
p.3
4
ensure that all teachers have the knowledge and skills they need to implement the curriculum well across all subjects. Teachers do not always check how well pupils remember the knowledge they have been taught rigorously enough. This means that gaps in pupils’ learning are not successfully identified or addressed. The school must ensure that assessment is used effectively to check what pupils know and remember across all subjects.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 8 and 9 May 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 14 July 2021, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The headteacher commenced the role in September 2023. The school offers before-school childcare for pupils who attend the school. It is run by school staff and managed by the governing body. The school does not use any off-site providers of alternative education.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, history and computing. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils 8 and 9 May 2024
p.5
6
about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors listened to some pupils read to a familiar adult. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects, including science and geography. Inspectors explored pupils’ writing in English and in the wider curriculum. As part of these discussions, inspectors looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors held meetings with leaders, including the headteacher, two assistant headteachers, the special educational needs coordinator, two governors and a representative working on behalf of the local authority. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central record, took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils, and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors took account of a range of other school information, including
p.6
6
development plans, policies, minutes of meetings of the governing body and reports from the local authority. Inspectors took account of pupils’ and staff’s views by observing interactions and holding separate discussions with groups of them. Inspectors considered the views of parents through the 17 responses to Ofsted Parent View, including 11 free-text comments. An inspector also met with several parents at the start of the school day.
p.6
Inspection team
Nick Rudman, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
James Puxley Ofsted Inspector 8 and 9 May 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion