Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Sycamore Academy

Inspected 12 Jun 2024 · published 15 Jul 2024 · URN 137786

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mandy Wilding

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Jun 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Mandy Wilding

  • Postcode verified

    NG3 4QP

  • Name on report verified

    Sycamore Academy

  • URN verified

    137786

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+56Positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyambitiousstrongproudconfidentcaringsafeenthusiastic
Criticismseriousseriouslynot consistentlyconcernsgapslowernot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1229w+55
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,233
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Sycamore Academy Abbotsford Drive, St Ann’s, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG3 4QP

p.1

Outcome

Sycamore Academy continues to be a good school.

p.1

Outcome

The headteacher of this school is Paul Worley. This school is part of L.E.A.D. Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Diana Owen, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Andy Buck.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy coming to this welcoming and inclusive school. They appreciate their caring teachers, who are always ready to help them. They feel listened to and safe because staff are quick to help them to resolve any problems.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are enthusiastic learners and aim to do their best. They explain that ‘you need to be responsible to be in our school family’. If they find this difficult, they get extra help. Pupils say that bullying is rare. They relish receiving golden tickets for showing ‘SHINE’ attitudes, such as ‘everyone works together’. Pupils are proud to be part of the citizen group, and to take on responsibilities such as school councillors and lunchtime servers.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school is aspirational for all its pupils. They study a wide range of interesting topics and books that enthuse them to learn new and ambitious vocabulary. Pupils take being a global citizen seriously and celebrate the diverse cultures within their community. They have many valuable experiences, including music and sports, as well as going on residential visits, including overseas. Pupils’ talents and interests are nurtured.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school is ambitious for every child to receive the best possible education. There have been many staff changes during the past year. The school has worked alongside the trust to ensure that it continues to improve. This has included timely support to boost the capacity of the dedicated staff team. 11 and 12 June 2024

p.1

2

The school has made many recent changes to its systems and procedures. This has included refining some curriculum plans. Staff have the expertise to deliver and make checks on the curriculum. In most subjects, the curriculum is well taught. Staff revisit important learning with pupils so that they can recall what they have learned and build on it successfully. However, in a small number of subjects, the curriculum is not consistently well delivered and pupils do not learn as much of the subject curriculum as leaders intend.

p.2

2

Reading is a priority at Sycamore Academy. There is a rigorous and consistent approach to teaching pupils to read. They begin to learn to read as soon as they join in the Reception year. Children in the Nursery develop important listening and sound discrimination skills. Carefully selected books are used as part of the curriculum. The school ensures that pupils become confident readers who can study texts in detail. Adults read regularly with and to pupils. Pupils enjoy using the rich array of books across the school. This helps them to develop a love of reading.

p.2

2

The school has refined the mathematics curriculum. Leaders have provided staff with useful training in this refined approach. Pupils are supported to systematically explain and deepen their learning. They have helpful opportunities to broaden their understanding of reasoning and problem-solving.

p.2

2

The school ensures that pupils learn increasingly sophisticated vocabulary across all subjects. As a result, pupils’ confidence to explain their understanding increases as they move through the school.

p.2

2

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are fully included in the life of the school . The well-considered pastoral provision supports these pupils to be ready to learn. The school has improved how it makes checks on the gaps in knowledge that pupils with SEND may have. However, staff do not reliably provide the right support and adaptations to the curriculum that these pupils may need. Sometimes, pupils with SEND do not develop their independence and fluency as quickly as they could.

p.2

2

Children get off to a strong start in the early years. This is because the school makes strong links with children and their families. Children enjoy the engaging activities and clear routines. This prepares them well in readiness for Year 1 and beyond.

p.2

2

The school has a calm and purposeful environment. L earning is rarely disrupted. Pupils’ attitudes to their learning are positive. Most attend regularly. Where this is not the case, the school takes robust steps to improve attendance.

p.2

2

The school prioritises pupils’ well-being. Pupils learn about different beliefs and family structures. They have an age-appropriate understanding of relationships and of respect. They are being well prepared for life in modern Britain.

p.2

2

Parents appreciate the approachable school staff. The vast majority feel confident that their children are safe and happy. 11 and 12 June 2024

p.2

3

Staff are proud to work at Sycamore Academy. They say that they feel fairly treated as part of this supportive team. Staff appreciate that leaders have been mindful of their well-being, particularly during many recent changes.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In a small number of subjects, the school’s curriculum is not as well implemented as it is in others. Pupils’ learning in these subjects is not as secure as it could be. The school should ensure that teachers receive the support they need to deliver the curriculum fully across all subjects so that all pupils, including in the early years, achieve as well as they can.  Some pupils with SEND do not learn their curriculum with increasing fluency and independence. This does not help them to make as much progress as they could. The school should ensure that staff provide precise support and adaptions so they become increasingly fluent and independent learners.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in November 2014.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 11 and 12 June 2024

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with SEND; pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 11 and 12 June 2024

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 27 November 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of the L.E.A.D Academy Trust.  The headteacher was not present during the inspection. The school has been supported by an executive headteacher from the trust.  There have been a number of staff changes, including a significant number of key leadership roles.  The school does not use any alternative provision.  There is an on-site breakfast club run by the school.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in this evaluation of the school. 11 and 12 June 2024

p.5

6

 The inspector met with the deputy headteachers, other school leaders, representatives of the trust and members of the academy governing body.  The inspector carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and foreign languages. For each deep dive, the inspector met with subject leaders to discuss the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at a sample of pupils’ work. The inspector listened to pupils in Years 1, 2 and 3 read to a member of staff. The inspector also met with leaders and looked at curriculum plans and samples of pupils’ work for science, history and geography.  The inspector spoke with parents and took account of the responses to Ofsted’s online survey for parents, Ofsted Parent View. The inspector also spoke with groups of pupils and staff.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single

p.6

6

central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspector reviewed a range of documents, including leaders’ self-evaluation, the school development plan, documentation relating to behaviour, attendance and governance, as well as information available on the school’s website.

p.6

Inspection team

Mandy Wilding, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 11 and 12 June 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion