Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Mytime Active – Kent House After School Club
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
12 Jul 2024
- URN verified
EY289589
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 351
- about usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 9 May 2024, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 15 May 2024, we carried out a regulatory telephone call. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We have issued actions for the provider to take. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that arrangements in place to support children with Special Educational Needs and/or Disabilities (SEND) meet their individual needs
p.1
Summary of outcome
n support staff to gain a good understanding of the key person role and their responsibility to help ensure that every child's care is tailored to meet their individual needs
p.1
Summary of outcome
n provide training to staff to ensure they can support all children, including those with Special Educational Needs and/or Disabilities (SEND), with their toileting and intimate hygiene
p.1
Summary of outcome
n put appropriate arrangements in place for staff supervision to provide support, coaching, and training for practitioners and promote the interests of children. On 4 July 2024, the provider responded to the actions set. We found that the provider had updated policies and procedures related to Special Educational Needs and/or Disabilities (SEND). They have provided training to staff on key person responsibilities. Staff have improved their understanding of good practice when supporting children with toileting and intimate hygiene. The provider has improved staff supervision arrangements to promote the interests of children.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion