Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Jul 2024

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sarah McGinnis (lead), Christopher Stevens

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christopher Stevens, Sarah McGinnis

  • Postcode verified

    SO15 2WZ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−34Criticalmore positive than 7% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedsafepositiveconfidentwell designedaccuratefeel safeattentive
Criticismconcernsseriousconcernat riskdecliningseriouslynot confidentabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1102w−30
  • What needs to improve127w−58

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,228
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
5
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Julian Waterfield Acting Headteacher St Anne’s Catholic School Carlton Road Southampton Hampshire SO15 2WZ

p.1

Urgent inspection of St Anne’s Catholic School

Following my visit with Sarah McGinnis, His Majesty’s Inspector, to the school on 5 and 6 June 2024, I write on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and the time you took to discuss the school.

p.1

Urgent inspection of St Anne’s Catholic School

This inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for urgent inspections. The inspection was carried out because His Majesty’s Chief Inspector wished to determine the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements at the school as concerns had been raised with Ofsted.

p.1

Urgent inspection of St Anne’s Catholic School

We do not give graded judgements on urgent inspections. However, if we find some evidence that overall standards may be declining, but where no serious concerns have been identified, then the next inspection will normally be a graded inspection, which will be carried out under section 5 of the Act and be brought forward. If we have serious concerns, we will deem the urgent inspection as a graded inspection immediately.

p.1

Evidence

We scrutinised the single central record and other documents relating to safeguarding and child protection arrangements. We met with the acting headteacher, executive headteacher, groups of pupils, groups of staff, the chair of the board of trustees, and a representative of the local authority.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors talked to pupils informally at various times of the school day. We examined school policies and information on the school’s website. In addition, we scrutinised trustees’ minutes, findings from local authority safeguarding audits, attendance records and records of concerns about adults. Inspectors considered the responses from parents to Ofsted Parent View and responses to Ofsted’s staff and pupil surveys.

p.1

Evidence

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.2

Main findings

In recent months, leaders, including those responsible for governance, have taken action to strengthen various aspects of safeguarding. Specifically, leaders have improved record- keeping, enhanced staff expertise in identifying and responding to pupils who may need help and made changes to the organisation of staff who are responsible safeguarding.

p.2

Main findings

Staff receive thorough training on a wide range of safeguarding topics. This helps them to identify signs of abuse and understand when it is necessary to report a concern. They are attentive to signs that a pupil may need help. They promptly share any concerns with the school’s safeguarding team. Leaders have established systems for staff to document their concerns about pupils who may be at risk. More recently, leaders have insisted that staff record any concerns about pupils formally. This means leaders now have a comprehensive overview of pupils’ individual circumstances and needs. Furthermore, staff are clear on how to report any worries they have about a member of staff’s behaviour.

p.2

Main findings

The acting headteacher is the main designated safeguarding lead. He works with a team of well-trained safeguarding staff, and they monitor all reports of concern diligently. This team investigates concerns well and refers to other agencies as needed. In addition, the members of the safeguarding team use information about concerns to identify broader patterns and trends that may exist across the school. For example, they have recently expanded the range of support available to pupils. As part of this work, leaders have made sure that pupils can more easily access counselling services to support their well- being. This support is highly valued by the pupils.

p.2

Main findings

The recruitment of staff follows appropriate safer recruitment practice. Several leaders and governors have completed safer recruitment training. At least one of these leaders is always present on interview panels. Leaders ensure that the correct pre-employment checks are made before staff take up post. They maintain an accurate record of these checks.

p.2

Main findings

School leaders understand the potential risks that pupils face. They educate pupils about these risks and provide them with the necessary information to help them stay safe. For example, pupils learn about how to keep safe while using the internet. The school’s personal, social, health and economic education curriculum is well designed. It ensures that pupils and students in the sixth form learn age-appropriate content about what constitutes positive and healthy relationships. Additionally, pupils are taught where and how to access support, including through an anonymous referral system on the school’s website, if they need it.

p.2

Main findings

The atmosphere around school at breaktime and lunchtimes is calm and orderly. At breaktime, hundreds of pupils, in smaller groups on the playground, chat calmly and pleasantly. They are well supervised by staff, who are vigilant but relaxed, talking to pupils about various aspects of school life while checking that everyone is safe.

p.3

Main findings

Pupils and students in the sixth form report that they feel safe in school. Most pupils feel confident to talk to adults in school about any worries they may have. However, some pupils, particularly in some younger year groups, do not feel they are able to report their concerns or that their concerns will be taken seriously. Leaders, including trustees, acknowledge that there is further work to do to ensure all pupils feel comfortable sharing any worries they have with adults in school.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders give serious attention to ensuring pupils and parents understand the importance of regular attendance. There is a good understanding of the links between safeguarding and attendance. Leaders systematically check on pupils’ attendance and are professionally curious about why pupils may not be in school. They take timely action to ensure the reasons for the absence are known and that they follow up absences well. For the small number of pupils who attend some of their education off site thorough checks are made to ensure they are safe.

p.3

Main findings

Trustees have the necessary skills to fulfil their roles. They ensure that the school is meeting statutory safeguarding duties. For instance, the school’s safeguarding policy takes into account the latest guidance provided by the Department for Education. Last year, trustees commissioned the local authority to undertake a review of the school’s safeguarding work. As a result of the findings of this audit, trustees have made several positive changes to strengthen aspects of safeguarding. These changes have included trustees ensuring that they receive a wider range of first-hand information about how well the school is safeguarding and protecting pupils. This means that trustees have an increasingly accurate view of what is working well and where things could be improved further.

p.3

Additional support

School leaders have benefited from the extensive range of support they have received from the local authority. This work has included undertaking a review of the school’s safeguarding practice.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Some pupils in the school do not feel confident in raising any concerns or worries they have with school staff. As a result, there is potential that a pupil may not share a problem they have. The school should take further action to gather a comprehensive view of what is causing some pupils to feel this way and take the necessary actions to ensure that all pupils feel confident in raising any concerns or worries they may have.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the director of education for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Portsmouth, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Southampton. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion