Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Chorlton Park Primary
Summary
Sheena Clark (lead), Katie Hague, Katie Thornton, Lisa Hesmondhalgh
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Jun 2024
- Inspectors verified
Katie Hague, Katie Thornton, Lisa Hesmondhalgh, Sheena Clark
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Outstanding
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Outstanding
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
M21 7HH
- Name on report verified
Chorlton Park Primary
- URN verified
142343
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsOutstanding
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentOutstanding
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- High-quality and well-designed activities help children to learn extremely well. p.2
- Skilled staff enhance children’s learning by effectively modelling ambitious language. p.2
- They delight in attending this caring, supportive school. p.2
- The school’s provision in the early years is exceptional. p.2
- As a result, children flourish and are ready for the next stage of learning. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This means that staff are sometimes unclear about what they should teach to help pupils become competent and accomplished writers. p.3
- The school’s programme for writing does not clearly identify the key information that pupils should learn and how this should be taught. p.3
- However, the school has not gone far enough in identifying the key knowledge that pupils should gain. p.3
- The school should identify the 4 and 5 June 2024 p.3
- foundational knowledge that pupils should acquire in writing and support staff in developing the expertise to deliver this well. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment2
“The headteachers of this school are Stefanie Habershon and Meryl Blackburn.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,160
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Chorlton Park Primary Barlow Moor Road, Chorlton-Cum-Hardy, Greater Manchester M21 7HH
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Outstanding Leadership and management Good Early years provision Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The headteachers of this school are Stefanie Habershon and Meryl Blackburn. This school is part of the Changing Lives in Collaboration Trust, which means that other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO) and executive headteacher, Jo Ashcroft, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Oliver George.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Ofsted has not previously inspected Chorlton Park Primary School as an academy under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 as, until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection of the predecessor school. 4 and 5 June 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
This is a school where everyone matters. Pupils are known for their individual qualities. They benefit from the kind relationships that they have with each other and with staff. Pupils are happy. They delight in attending this caring, supportive school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is highly aspirational for pupils. It wants the very best for pupils’ academic success and for their wider development as active, positive citizens. Many pupils meet these high standards. They achieve well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are courteous and helpful to other people. They are confident when speaking to visitors. Pupils are incredibly proud of their school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school prepares pupils for life in modern Britain extremely well. Pupils are taught about fundamental British values and about their rights and responsibilities. They celebrate diversity and warmly welcome others into the school community. For example, pupils learn about people from a range of cultures and backgrounds. They visit different places of worship and share cultural identity days in school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils have many opportunities to learn beyond the academic curriculum, such as during residential visits and exciting trips. They benefit from events that support their future lives, including an ‘aspirations week’, where they learn about potential career choices.
p.2
better?
The school has created a highly ambitious curriculum. The small steps of knowledge that pupils learn in most subject curriculums are carefully ordered from the beginning of the early years to the end of Year 6. With the support and direction of the trust, the school has ensured that staff have the information and expertise to deliver the curriculum effectively. Staff check that pupils are learning well.
p.2
better?
The school’s provision in the early years is exceptional. From the moment that children enter the school, they are immersed in a world of learning, imagination and exploration. High-quality and well-designed activities help children to learn extremely well. Communication and language are seamlessly woven into each area of learning. Skilled staff enhance children’s learning by effectively modelling ambitious language. There are no limits placed on children in the early years. As a result, children flourish and are ready for the next stage of learning.
p.2
better?
The school’s published data for writing in 2023 indicated that some pupils’ attainment at the end of Year 6 was significantly below the national average. While pupils typically learn extremely well in most subjects, pupils’ foundational knowledge and stamina in writing was hampered by the COVID-19 pandemic. The school has begun to take suitable action to bring about improvement. It has updated the way in which pupils learn to write starting from the time that children join the early years. 4 and 5 June 2024
p.2
3
However, the school has not gone far enough in identifying the key knowledge that pupils should gain. This means that staff are sometimes unclear about what they should teach to help pupils become competent and accomplished writers.
p.3
3
Reading is at the heart of the school’s curriculum. Pupils read books written by a wide range of authors. From the start of the early years, the school places a sharp focus on making sure that children learn to read confidently and fluently. Pupils who struggle in learning to read are quickly spotted and well supported. Pupils throughout school spoke of their love of reading and their understanding of its high importance.
p.3
3
The school has strategies in place to swiftly identify pupils with SEND. Pupils are supported to follow the full curriculum alongside their peers. The school works effectively with families and with external professionals to support pupils with complex additional needs well.
p.3
3
The school’s programme for personal development is remarkable. It enhances pupils’ talents and interests through a wealth of activities, such as steel pan drumming, gardening, comic and skateboarding clubs. Pupils learn about the local area. They become active members of their community, for example by collecting and donating resources to local food banks. Pupils share their own opinions during debates. Through their roles as ambassadors, they act as a voice and as role models for others. Pupils have opportunities to learn about similarities and differences between themselves and others.
p.3
3
Pupils are enthusiastic learners who behave sensibly. Children in the early years learn to interact considerately with each other. Pupils are polite and friendly. They have high levels of attendance. The school works well with pupils and families to successfully address any instances where pupils’ attendance begins to decline.
p.3
3
Trustees and members of the local governing board are proud of their roles in supporting and challenging the school. They are mindful of staff well-being. Staff appreciate the considerate approach taken to distribute workload and to share expertise with colleagues across the trust.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school’s programme for writing does not clearly identify the key information that pupils should learn and how this should be taught. On occasion, the activities that staff choose do not help pupils to learn the important knowledge that they need to become skilled and successful writers. The school should identify the 4 and 5 June 2024
p.3
4
foundational knowledge that pupils should acquire in writing and support staff in developing the expertise to deliver this well.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 4 and 5 June 2024
p.4
School details
Headteachers Jo Ashcroft (executive headteacher) Stefanie Habershon Meryl Blackburn Website www.chorltonpark.manchester.sch.uk
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 20 and 21 June 2013, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of Changing Lives in Collaboration trust. Chorlton Park Primary converted to become an academy school in September 2016. When its predecessor school, of the same name, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be outstanding overall. The school does not use any alternative provision for pupils. The school provides a breakfast and after-school club.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 4 and 5 June 2024
p.5
6
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the headteachers, other school leaders and staff. The lead inspector met with members of the local governing board, including the chair of governors. She also met with representatives of the trust, including the chair of the trust and the CEO. The lead inspector spoke with a representative of the local authority. Inspectors carried out deep dives in the following subjects: English, including early reading, mathematics, geography, science, physical education and modern foreign languages. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with a range of pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors
p.6
6
also discussed the curriculum in other subjects and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector heard some pupils from Years 1 to 3 read to a familiar adult. Inspectors spoke with pupils during meetings, breaktimes and lunchtimes. An inspector also visited the breakfast club. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free- text comments. Inspectors also spoke with some parents during the inspection. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for staff and for pupils. Inspectors reviewed a range of documents, including school policies, school improvement documents, records of support for families and a sample of documents for pupils with SEND. Inspectors also looked at minutes from local governing body meetings, information about pupils leaving and starting school and records relating to pupils’ behaviour and attendance. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single
p.6
6
central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interest first.
p.6
Inspection team
Sheena Clark, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Lisa Hesmondhalgh Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 June 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion