Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Bartholomews CofE Primary School

Inspected 13 Jun 2024 · published 11 Jul 2024 · URN 120551

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Shaun Carter (lead), Lea Mason

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Jun 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Lea Mason, Shaun Carter

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    PE11 3QJ

  • Name on report verified

    St Bartholomew’s CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    120551

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationseffectivewell plannedstrongfeel safehappypoliteeffectively
Criticismnot alwaysgapsinconsistencieslackslacknot sufficientlynot strongnot well sequenced

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1219w−16
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve31w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,215
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
21%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of St Bartholomew’s CofE Primary School Leaveslake Drove, West Pinchbeck, Spalding, Lincolnshire PE11 3QJ

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 12 and 13 June 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

With its motto of ‘let your light shine’, the ambition of raising aspirations and broadening horizons sits at the heart of St Bartholomew’s. The school aims to prepare pupils to live life to the full. Staff link what pupils are learning in the classroom to the real world and to pupils’ potential future careers.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils describe St Bartholomew’s as being like a big family. This inclusive ethos makes them feel safe and valued. Pupils say, ‘The staff here always give you a big smile in the morning which makes us feel happy, welcome and ready for the day.’

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils have a voice and know that they are listened to. For example, pupils helped to design the enrichment activities that make up ‘30 things to do before you leave St Bart’s’.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well. They are polite and friendly. They like being rewarded with ‘shine stamps’ and spending them in the ‘shine shop’.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has made many improvements to its curriculum. However, it has not addressed some key issues effectively enough. Too many pupils do not achieve what they should in reading, writing and mathematics by the time they reach the end of key stage 2.

p.2

better?

Most aspects of the school’s curriculum are well planned. In most subjects, the school has set out the knowledge and skills that pupils must gain in a logical and progressive order. The early years curriculum builds children’s understanding in small steps, preparing them well for key stage 1. The school has thought carefully about the vocabulary that pupils need to acquire. There are opportunities for pupils to revisit and build on their prior learning. New ways of checking pupils’ progress through the curriculum are in place. However, many of these changes have occurred recently. Some subjects are not always taught in the way the school expects. These inconsistencies mean that some pupils do not learn the curriculum as well as they could. In some subjects, pupils remember the activity rather than the underpinning knowledge they need to retain and use again.

p.2

better?

Phonics is taught well. Staff encourage fluent reading by asking pupils to sound out in their heads if they can. The reading books that pupils take home are matched to the letter sounds they recognise. However, the teaching of reading beyond phonics is not as strong. The reading curriculum in key stage 2 lacks clarity. The school has not given enough thought to the texts that pupils will read in guided reading sessions. It is not clear what pupils are expected to know and do to make progress in reading comprehension. The focus of pupils’ work in guided reading is too narrow. It is not always sufficiently demanding. 12 and 13 June 2024

p.2

3

The early years environment is vibrant and stimulating. Children engage well in free- flow activities. They especially like singing along with nursery rhymes and putting on imaginative performances. Early years staff have all been trained in how to develop children’s language and communication skills. They listen carefully to what children say and ask questions to consolidate and extend understanding.

p.3

3

Staff meet the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) well. Where necessary, they adapt learning by adjusting tasks or providing additional resources and support. However, the provision for disadvantaged pupils is not precise. It does not always focus well enough on their gaps in learning or their next steps.

p.3

3

Through the school’s values of friendship, love, tolerance and acceptance, for- giveness, trust and hope, staff teach pupils how to be sociable and respectful citi- zens. Pupils live up to these high expectations most of the time.

p.3

3

The school’s procedures for managing and improving attendance are effective. Absence is low. The school ensures that parents and carers understand the importance of high attendance.

p.3

3

The school’s personal development offer is strong. Pupils learn how to be healthy, safe and responsible. They understand the importance of equality. They respect difference and diversity. Pupils’ education is enriched by many curriculum-linked trips that bring learning to life and give pupils experiences which they may not otherwise have. Pupils appreciate the pastoral support available to them.

p.3

3

The school knows that outcomes at the end of key stage 2 in reading, writing and mathematics need improving. However, strategic plans do not address all these key areas well enough. Some aspects of the school’s plans for improvement lack precision which means that leaders may not reliably focus on the most urgent action that they need to take.

p.3

3

Staff are passionate and dedicated. They feel well supported with their workload.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The reading curriculum beyond phonics is not well sequenced. The school has not given enough thought to the texts that pupils will read or how they will deepen their understanding of what they read over time. Pupils do not learn to read as well as they could. The school must ensure that its reading curriculum develops 12 and 13 June 2024

p.3

4

pupils’ ability to understand increasingly complex texts, so they are well prepared for the next stage of their education.  There have been many improvements to the curriculum recently. However, some of these developments are not yet implemented consistently or having the impact that the school intends. In some subjects, pupils do not remember the important knowledge they need to retain securely. The school must embed the changes that have been made to its curriculum so that pupils attain as highly as possible in all subjects.  Some aspects of the school’s plan to improve outcomes for disadvantaged pupils are not precise. Additional support for disadvantaged pupils does not always focus well enough on their gaps in learning or their next steps. Consequently, some dis- advantaged pupils do not achieve as well as they could. The school must ensure that disadvantaged pupils receive the support they need to attain as highly as

p.4

4

possible in reading, writing and mathematics.  The school’s improvement planning does not sufficiently address some of the most important areas for improvement. Consequently, the quality of education in some areas of the curriculum has not been improved as well as it could. The school must refine its improvement planning processes so there is a clear strategy in place for all key issues. It must check closely on the implementation of this plan so that improvements are made swiftly and have a lasting impact.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 12 and 13 June 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 3 October 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The headteacher has been in the role since January 2022.  This is a Church of England school in the Diocese of Lincoln. The most recent sec- tion 48 inspection of St Bartholomew’s CofE Primary School took place in May 2024. This is an inspection of the school’s religious character.  The school does not use any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school's education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 12 and 13 June 2024

p.5

6

 Inspectors carried out deep dives in reading, English, science and art and design. For the deep dives, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The lead inspector also considered the curriculums for mathematics and history. He visited mathematics lessons and looked at samples of pupils’ mathematics work. The lead inspector also looked at pupils’ work in history.  Inspectors met with the headteacher and the deputy headteacher, subject leaders, teachers and support staff. Inspectors met with the leaders with responsibility for pupils with SEND, behaviour, attendance and personal development.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive

p.6

6

culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors examined a range of school documentation, including leaders’ self- evaluation and the school development plan, as well as documentation relating to disadvantaged pupils, pupils with SEND, behaviour, attendance and governance.  The lead inspector listened to a sample of pupils in Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 and Year 4 read. Inspectors met with groups of pupils from across the school.  The lead inspector met with governors, including the chair of the governing body. He also spoke with a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, and considered the results of the Ofsted staff survey and pupil survey.

p.6

Inspection team

Shaun Carter, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Lea Mason Ofsted Inspector 12 and 13 June 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion