Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Dereham Church of England Junior Academy

Inspected 20 Jun 2024 · published 9 Jul 2024 · URN 142395

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adam Cooke

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Jun 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Adam Cooke

  • Postcode verified

    NR19 1BJ

  • Name on report verified

    Dereham Church of England Junior Academy

  • URN verified

    142395

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+35Mostly positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationsambitiousstronghappycaringenthusiasmimprovedskilful
Criticismseriousconcernfall behindnot alwaysconcernslowernot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1080w+33
  • Safeguarding11w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,087
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Safeguarding 1%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Dereham Church of England Junior Academy Gilpin’s Ride, Littlefields, Dereham, Norfolk NR19 1BJ

p.1

Outcome

Dereham Church of England Junior Academy continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy, kind and inquisitive in this highly inclusive community. They behave and learn well because of their teachers’ high expectations. Pupils are safe. Pupils like their school because of its caring ethos. Pupils take care of each other. They know they can always turn to an adult if they ever have a concern.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are ready to learn. They listen carefully and eagerly respond to their teachers’ questions. They discuss their learning with enthusiasm. They help each other to learn. They have gained knowledge of world religions. Pupils respect difference. They do not tolerate any prejudicial attitudes.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils visit museums, castles and places of natural beauty, which enhance their cultural, historical and scientific knowledge. They have residential experiences away from home. These help pupils to develop independence and responsibility. All pupils learn to play musical instruments. Pupils appreciate the opportunities to contribute to the school and local community. Pupils learn important leadership skills. Eco-warriors raise awareness of environmental issues. School councillors represent their friends’ views and help fundraise for a range of charities. Pupils maintain the Good Shepherd Garden, where pupils can reflect and contemplate. Parents’ and carers’ perceptions of the school have improved considerably since the last inspection.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Leaders have constructed an ambitious curriculum. They have precisely identified the knowledge pupils should learn. This knowledge links well to what pupils have learned before. Pupils regularly revisit prior learning. This helps them to remember knowledge better.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Most teachers have strong subject knowledge as a result of the training they receive. At their best, teachers prompt and develop pupils’ thinking and knowledge through skilful questioning. They rigorously check how well pupils are learning. Most teachers carefully 19 and 20 June 2024

p.1

2

present new knowledge clearly and in small stages so that pupils understand. In some areas of the curriculum, some teachers do not introduce new knowledge with the same clarity. As a result, some pupils do not grasp new knowledge and understanding as well as they might.

p.2

2

Leaders have prioritised the teaching of reading. Pupils apply strategies which help them to understand increasingly sophisticated texts. They work out the meaning of unfamiliar words and build a rich vocabulary and understanding of grammar. They incorporate this knowledge accurately in their writing. The books pupils read introduce them to different cultures from across the world. Pupils gain insight into more mature concepts, such as racism, the plight of refugees and the impact of war. As a result, pupils begin to empathise with those in challenging situations across the world. Pupils who fall behind with their reading, and in other areas of the curriculum, receive immediate support and they catch up.

p.2

2

In mathematics, pupils calculate swiftly. They explain their working out with confidence. However, pupils are not always supported to apply their knowledge to solve problems. Leaders are aware of this and are refining the curriculum.

p.2

2

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) achieve well. Leaders provide staff with precise guidance on how to adapt the curriculum for pupils with SEND. Leaders meticulously check how well pupils with SEND are learning. They quickly refine support in response to these checks.

p.2

2

Inclusion resonates throughout the school. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is well above the national average. Leaders provide many of these pupils with additional help to access the curriculum. Leaders ensure disadvantaged pupils build the cultural knowledge they need for the future. Leaders’ actions ensure that pupils attend regularly and respond swiftly when pupils do not.

p.2

2

Pupils are open-minded and compassionate. They understand how to nurture positive, healthy relationships. They respect the diverse nature of family. They know how their behaviours can affect how others feel. They modify their behaviour because of this.

p.2

2

Staff find their workload manageable. They value the support they receive to help them hone their subject knowledge. Leaders, governors and the trust astutely evaluate how well all areas of the school are performing. They know what they need to do to be even better. They are well equipped to make this happen.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 19 and 20 June 2024

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some areas of the curriculum, teachers do not present new knowledge clearly. Learning is not broken down into small chunks that pupils can understand. As a result of this, some pupils do not learn new knowledge and grasp understanding as well as they might. Leaders need to provide some teachers with support to present new knowledge gradually so that pupils understand and learn better.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged Dereham Church of England Junior Academy to be good in July 2018.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 19 and 20 June 2024

p.3

CEO of the trust

Dates of previous inspection 3 and 4 July 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 The school is a member of The Diocese of Norwich Education and Academies Trust.  The school does not make use of alternative provision.  The school’s last section 48 inspection was in December 2016. The school was graded good.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 19 and 20 June 2024

p.4

5

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in his evaluation of the school.  The inspector met with the chief executive officer (CEO), the deputy CEO, other trustees, the chair of governors, other governors, the headteacher, other leaders, subject leaders, teachers and support staff. The inspector carried out deep dives in English, mathematics and science. These included discussions with subject leaders, visits to lessons, meetings with staff and pupils, scrutiny of pupils’ work and a review of any curriculum documentation. He also scrutinised other curriculum documentation.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around

p.5

5

safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspector considered the views of pupils, staff and parents. There were 34 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey. There were 75 responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey. There were 62 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View. The inspector considered 61 free-text responses from parents. He also spoke to parents.

p.5

Inspection team

Adam Cooke, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector 19 and 20 June 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion