Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Tottington High School
Summary
Sally Rix (lead), Alan Hammersley, David Roberts, Derek Yarwood, Phillip Walmsley
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 May 2024
- Inspectors verified
Alan Hammersley, David Roberts, Derek Yarwood, Phillip Walmsley, Sally Rix
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BL8 3LY
- Name on report verified
Tottington High School
- URN verified
146529
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, weaknesses that have existed in the curriculum, together with some disruption to lessons in the past, have led to some feeling disheartened about their studies. p.2
- The school has strengthened its approach to dealing with the unacceptable conduct of some pupils. p.3
- However, poor behaviour remains a barrier to learning for some pupils. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The headteacher of this school is Lee Barber. p.1
- This school is part of the Shaw Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. p.1
- The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Jo Morgan, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Andrew Meehan. 14 and 15 May 2024 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,344
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 32%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Tottington High School Laurel Street, Tottington, Bury, Lancashire BL8 3LY
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The headteacher of this school is Lee Barber. This school is part of the Shaw Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Jo Morgan, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Andrew Meehan. 14 and 15 May 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are beginning to benefit from the actions that the school and the trust are taking to strengthen the quality of education that they provide. Most pupils welcome these changes. They recognise that many aspects of their school experience are improving. This is helping pupils to feel happier in school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils appreciate that they have an increasingly strong voice in the school. For instance, breaktimes have been extended in consultation with pupils. Pupil leaders feel reinvigorated. They wear their golden ties with pride. Some pupil leaders eagerly described the central role that they are about to take in the school’s new approach to anti-bullying.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils are polite and well mannered. Pupils’ behaviour in lessons is improving. However, weaknesses that have existed in the curriculum, together with some disruption to lessons in the past, have led to some feeling disheartened about their studies. Some pupils lack the motivation needed to be successful in their learning.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The trust has helped the school to raise its expectations of pupils’ achievement, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The school has strengthened the curriculum so that pupils learn increasingly well. However, inconsistencies in the delivery of the curriculum remain. This means that pupils do not achieve as well as they should.
p.2
better?
The school has an accurate understanding of its strengths and the areas that require development. It is working closely with the trust to bring about the necessary improvement. Some of this work has already made a difference. For example, the curriculum offer is much stronger and pupils’ behaviour is improving. However, the turbulence in staffing has hindered the school’s progress against its development priorities. This means that some of its work has not had enough impact to smooth out pupils’ uneven journey through different curriculum areas. With the decisive action of the trust, the issues with staffing are largely resolved and the school is back on track. There is a firm foundation on which to build. Most staff appreciate the way in which change has been introduced. They welcome the work that is taking place to improve the school.
p.2
better?
The trust and the school have prioritised developing staff’s expertise in curriculum design. As a result, subject curriculums are well organised. They ensure that staff know what has to be taught and when pupils should learn subject content. This is helping to enable pupils to make smoother progress through a more ambitious curriculum offer. Staff particularly value ‘curriculum conferencing’ time when they work together to review and improve the curriculum. 14 and 15 May 2024
p.2
3
The school has ensured that staff routinely use strategies that promote effective learning. However, there is inconsistency in teachers’ understanding of how to deliver these strategies effectively within different curriculum areas. As a result, some learning activities do not help pupils to learn subject content. This includes strategies to help pupils to remember their learning over time. In addition, some teachers do not use the school’s assessment strategies effectively to check that pupils’ prior knowledge is secure before they introduce new content. Consequently, in some subjects, pupils’ learning does not build securely over time. This hinders their achievement.
p.3
3
The school provides carefully targeted support for those pupils who struggle with reading. This helps them to make up for gaps in their reading knowledge. Recently, the school has raised the profile of reading. Even so, some pupils do not choose to read for pleasure.
p.3
3
Recently, the school has reviewed its provision for pupils with SEND. It identifies the needs of these pupils accurately. Staff receive useful information about how to support pupils with SEND. However, some staff do not use this information well enough to adapt their delivery of the curriculum. Some pupils with SEND do not learn as well as they should.
p.3
3
The school has strengthened its approach to dealing with the unacceptable conduct of some pupils. Although some parents and carers remain concerned, pupils and staff said that behaviour is improving. Typically, the atmosphere in the school is calm and orderly. In the main, pupils are respectful to staff. However, poor behaviour remains a barrier to learning for some pupils. The school has begun to provide well- thought-out support to help these pupils to improve their behaviour and to engage with their education.
p.3
3
Some pupils, including vulnerable pupils, do not attend school as often as they should. The school has prioritised improving pupils’ attendance. It has suitable processes in place to reduce absenteeism. These are beginning to take effect.
p.3
3
The school provides an appropriate programme to support pupils’ personal development. For example, pupils learn important information about fundamental British values and respect for people who are different from themselves. However, some pupils do not value this learning. The school has recently begun to increase the range of enrichment opportunities on offer to extend pupils’ learning beyond the academic curriculum. However, there is more to do to increase pupils’ participation to ensure that many pupils, including the most vulnerable, benefit from these opportunities to extend their interests and talents.
p.3
3
Pupils spoke particularly positively about the strong careers guidance that they receive. They are provided with a wealth of useful information to help them to make well-informed choices about their next steps. 14 and 15 May 2024
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some staff lack an understanding of how to use agreed learning strategies effectively. Consequently, on occasions, pupils, including those with SEND, do not learn curriculum content well enough. The school should ensure that staff develop their pedagogical understanding to enable them to deliver subject curriculums consistently well. Some staff do not use the school’s assessment processes effectively to ensure that pupils’ prior knowledge is secure before moving on to new learning. As a result, some pupils develop misconceptions and gaps in their knowledge that are not addressed. The school should ensure that staff have the expertise to use assessment strategies consistently well. Some staff do not use the information that they receive about pupils with SEND to adapt learning effectively to meet the needs of these pupils. This means that, at times, pupils with SEND do not learn as well as they should. The school should
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
ensure that it provides appropriate training for staff to enable them to help these pupils to learn successfully. Some aspects of the school’s provision for pupils’ personal development are limited, including pupils’ engagement in a broad range of enrichment activities. This means that some pupils, particularly the most vulnerable, do not benefit from opportunities to develop their unique talents and interests. The school should take effective action to increase pupils’ participation in enrichment activities and it should strengthen its approach to monitoring engagement to ensure that those pupils who will benefit the most are included.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school. 14 and 15 May 2024
p.4
5
In the report, ‘ disadvantaged pupils ’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 14 and 15 May 2024
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 29 and 30 November 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The school has an interim headteacher who has been in place since the start of the spring term 2024. The trust has appointed a permanent headteacher, who will take up post from June 2024. Since the previous inspection, a number of new staff have joined the school, including senior and middle leaders. The school uses one registered and two unregistered alternative providers for a very small number of pupils. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical-education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 14 and 15 May 2024
p.6
7
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, science, geography, modern foreign languages, art and design and computing. For each deep dive, they discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. An inspector also spoke to leaders about the curriculum in other subjects. Inspectors spoke with the headteacher, other leaders and staff. Inspectors spoke with representatives of the trust. An inspector spoke with a representative of the local authority. Inspectors spoke to pupils about their experiences of school and their views on
p.7
7
behaviour and bullying. They also observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at breaktimes. Inspectors considered the responses shared through Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. They also considered the responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff. There were no responses to Ofsted’s online survey for pupils. The inspectors reviewed a wide range of evidence, including the school’s self- evaluation documents and records relating to pupils’ behaviour and attendance. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record, took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.
p.7
Inspection team
Sally Rix, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Derek Yarwood Ofsted Inspector 14 and 15 May 2024
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion