Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Cuthbert's Church of England Primary School
Summary
David Spruce (lead), Helen Friend, Stephanie Swift
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 May 2024
- Inspectors verified
David Spruce, Helen Friend, Stephanie Swift
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BB3 0HY
- Name on report verified
St Cuthbert’s Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
119615
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school does not consistently uphold high expectations for pupils’ behaviour. p.4
- Some of these deficiencies are not being addressed swiftly enough. p.2
- Although there are still some shortcomings in the early years curriculum, able staff have the expertise to work around these issues. p.3
- In turn, it does not respond quickly enough to weaknesses in curriculum implementation that prevent pupils from learning all that they should. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 seven years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. p.1
- This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time. p.1
- From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. p.1
- Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection. 1 and 2 May 2024 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,600
- longer than usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 22%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Cuthbert’s Church of England Primary School St Albans Road, Darwen, Lancashire BB3 0HY
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 seven years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection. 1 and 2 May 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are happy and safe at this school. In most cases, they play nicely together during breaktimes and lunchtimes. However, some pupils did report that they sometimes experience unkind words and behaviours. More often than not, the school deals with such issues appropriately.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
After a period of staffing turbulence, the school is beginning to raise its expectations for what pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), should achieve. It has overhauled its curriculum to be more ambitious for what pupils will learn. However, there has not been enough time to see the full impact of these changes on pupils’ attainment and progress. Consequently, pupils in both key stages 1 and 2 have not attained well in recent national end of key stage tests.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
There is a range of extra-curricular opportunities that many pupils attend. Examples include sports clubs, an amateur dramatics club and choir club. Pupils also have opportunities to go on residential visits, which they enjoy. Pupils take an active role in getting involved with charitable and community initiatives. They collect for food banks and arrange cake sales to raise funds for their chosen causes. Pupils also take on leadership roles, such as being a playground leader.
p.2
better?
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was clearly felt at this school. Pupils returned to school with large gaps in their learning. Unforeseen staffing changes soon followed. This had a considerable impact on the school. In turn, this led to an erosion in the quality of education and hampered the school’s ability to respond swiftly to pupils’ gaps in learning. These circumstances have ultimately contributed to pupils, including those with SEND, not achieving as well as they should.
p.2
better?
Staffing has now started to stabilise. New governors and senior leaders have been appointed. They are becoming increasingly effective in their roles. The school has engaged well with the local authority and other external partners to address many of the issues, including some of those related to the quality of education. The school is now back on the right track. It has the capacity to bring about further improvements.
p.2
better?
The school has introduced many new subject curriculums to ensure that there is greater breadth and balance in what pupils learn. It is still making some refinements to these curriculums to further suit the needs of its pupils. That said, these curriculums are typically designed and taught in a logical order so that pupils build some of their knowledge in a more secure way.
p.2
better?
The school is still getting to grips with some of the curriculum changes. Consequently, there is variability in how well subject curriculums are delivered. Some of these deficiencies are not being addressed swiftly enough. This is because the 1 and 2 May 2024
p.2
3
school is still developing its ability to oversee the delivery of curriculums and to evaluate their impact on pupils’ learning. As a result, some pupils do not develop a secure body of knowledge across a range of subjects.
p.3
3
The school does not carry out effective checks on how well pupils are acquiring new knowledge in their lessons. In some cases, pupils are not spotted and supported when they need help with their learning.
p.3
3
The school has made recent improvements to how it identifies pupils with SEND. These changes are helping the school to identify pupils’ additional needs early. The school currently has a specially resourced provision for pupils with SEND (specially resourced provision). The responsibility for this specially resourced provision is being transferred to a different school at the end of the academic year. Along with the local authority, all parties are working together during this handover period to develop a new curriculum to suit these new arrangements.
p.3
3
Children in the early years get off to a positive start. They have not been affected by historical issues at the school. Although there are still some shortcomings in the early years curriculum, able staff have the expertise to work around these issues. They design appropriate learning activities that help children to build the knowledge and skills that they need for key stage 1. They are being better prepared for the next stage of their education than is the case elsewhere in the school.
p.3
3
The school ensures that children learn phonics as soon as they start in the Reception Year. However, this programme is not delivered consistently well throughout key stage 1. Some staff have not been sufficiently trained to deliver the programme. Pupils in some classes read books that are not well matched to their knowledge of sounds. Those who need to catch up with their reading do not receive effective support to close their individual phonics gaps. These issues mean that pupils do not become fluent readers as quickly as they could.
p.3
3
The school has raised its expectations for pupils’ behaviour through its new behaviour policy. Many staff recognise the recent, positive changes, such as the reduction of low-level disruption during lesson times. However, some pupils disengage from their learning. In these cases, the school does not routinely help pupils to refocus their attention on their education. Consequently, these pupils do not learn as well as they should.
p.3
3
The school makes sure that attendance is a high priority. The majority of pupils attend school regularly. The school has effective systems in place to support families and to remove any barriers that prevent some pupils from coming to school.
p.3
3
The school caters for pupils’ personal development by helping them to keep themselves healthy and safe. Pupils are taught about how their bodies will change and grow. However, the school’s current approaches to fostering a culture of respect and tolerance are not having the desired impact. Some pupils use unkind words and behaviours towards others. At times, these can be of a discriminatory nature. Pupils do not have a secure knowledge of, and appreciation for, fundamental British values. 1 and 2 May 2024
p.3
4
Staff told inspectors that they feel supported by leaders. They feel that their workload is duly considered. They particularly value the changes that leaders have made to the school’s marking policy.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school does not have sufficient insight into how well the curriculums are delivered in practice. In turn, it does not respond quickly enough to weaknesses in curriculum implementation that prevent pupils from learning all that they should. The school should ensure that subject leaders have the expertise that they need to oversee their subjects well. The school does not ensure that its phonics programme is implemented well. Some pupils do not read books that match the sounds that they know. Those who need to catch up do not receive effective support. Consequently, pupils do not become fluent readers quickly enough. The school should ensure that staff are able to deliver the phonics programme well so that pupils become confident and fluent readers. The school does not use effective strategies to check how well pupils understand new content. This sometimes means that pupils are not identified and supported
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
quickly enough when they struggle with new curriculum content. In turn, pupils do not develop their knowledge securely over time. The school should ensure that staff have the guidance and strategies that they need to identify and support pupils when they need help with their learning. The school does not consistently uphold high expectations for pupils’ behaviour. When this happens, some staff do not support pupils to refocus their attention on learning. Consequently, these pupils do not acquire some of the key knowledge that is being taught. The school should further raise its expectations for pupils’ behaviour and help pupils to develop positive attitudes to learning. Some pupils do not treat others with appropriate levels of courtesy and respect. At times, they do not have due regard for people’s differences. Consequently, some pupils experience unkind language and behaviours that are not in keeping
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
with fundamental British values. The school should review how it fosters an environment in which people’s views and differences are respected. 1 and 2 May 2024
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 1 and 2 May 2024
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
School details
Website www.stcuthbertscofeprimary.co.uk
p.6
School details
Dates of previous inspection 4 and 5 April 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
There have been several changes in headteacher since the last inspection. The current headteacher was appointed to this position in September 2022. A new deputy headteacher, assistant headteacher and SEND coordinator have been appointed since then. Several new governors, including the chair of governors, have been appointed in this academic year. Leaders make use of one registered alternative provider. There is a specially resourced provision for pupils with SEND at the school. The responsibility for this specially resourced provision is being transferred to a different school at the end of the academic year. There were 15 pupils on roll in the specially resourced provision at the time of the inspection. An external provider operates before- and after-school clubs at the school. The school is a voluntary aided Church of England primary school. The most recent section 48 inspection of the school’s religious character took place in
p.6
Information about this school
January 2024. The school is awaiting confirmation from the diocese about its next section 48 inspection. 1 and 2 May 2024
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. They deemed the inspection a graded (section 5) inspection under the same Act.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection that the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors conducted deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and music. They met with subject leaders and teachers. They visited lessons, looked at examples of pupils’ work and talked with groups of pupils about their learning. The lead inspector observed pupils read to a familiar adult. Inspectors also considered the curriculum, spoke with pupils about their learning and evaluated their work in some other subjects. The lead inspector spoke with a group of governors. Inspectors also talked to staff about their workload and well-being. The lead inspector spoke with a representative of the local authority and the
p.7
Information about this inspection
diocese. Inspectors met with the leaders who are responsible for attendance, behaviour and pupils’ personal development. Inspectors spoke with pupils about their wider experience of school. Inspectors looked at a range of policies and documents related to pupils’ welfare and education. They observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors took account of the responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff and pupils. Inspectors met with parents at the start of the school day and took account of the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses.
p.7
Inspection team
David Spruce, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Helen Friend His Majesty’s Inspector 1 and 2 May 2024
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion