Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Padiham St Leonard's Voluntary Aided Church of England Primary School
Summary
David Spruce (lead), Elizabeth Travis, Rachael Alarcon
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 May 2024
- Inspectors verified
David Spruce, Elizabeth Travis, Rachael Alarcon
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BB12 8HT
- Name on report verified
Padiham St Leonard’s Voluntary Aided Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
119425
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, the school does not consistently uphold its expectations for pupils’ conduct, which leads to low-level disruption at points in the school day that sometimes goes unchecked. p.2
- This conduct sometimes puts pupils at risk of potential harm. p.3
- This sometimes puts them at risk of harm. p.4
- Consequently, the school, including governors, does not have a sufficient awareness of the weaknesses in curriculum delivery and the impact that such issues have on what pupils learn and remember over time. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school should review how it evaluates the effectiveness of subject curriculums so that it can identify and respond to the weaknesses in curriculum delivery. p.4
- Consequently, pupils struggle at the early stages of learning to read for longer than they should. p.4
- The school should ensure that pupils are provided with accessible books that match well to their current reading abilities and ensure that catch-up support helps pupils to close their individual knowledge gaps. p.4
- Particularly during social times, pupils do not behave as well as they should. p.4
- Staff adhere to the school’s expectations for how this programme should be delivered. p.3
- It provides staff with appropriate information and guidance on how the delivery of the curriculum might need to be adapted in order to meet these pupils’ additional needs. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Personal development4
“Early careers teachers are well supported by able mentors.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,356
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 21%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Padiham St Leonard’s Voluntary Aided Church of England Primary School Moor Lane, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire BB12 8HT
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good Primary School 8 and 9 May 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils’ school experiences are enriched through a variety of initiatives. For instance, older pupils take turns learning to fish during ‘Fishing Fridays’. They learn how to play instruments such as the ukelele during their music lessons. Some pupils benefit from the sporting clubs on offer. The school also arranges clubs for pupils’ families to participate in, such as pasta club, in which families learn to cook together. Pupils told inspectors that they enjoyed regularly using the school’s woodland area as part of their learning activities.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are happy and safe at this school, and they generally behave well. However, the school does not consistently uphold its expectations for pupils’ conduct, which leads to low-level disruption at points in the school day that sometimes goes unchecked.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is ambitious for what pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), should achieve. However, at times, these ambitions are not fully realised. In part, this is because there is some variability in how consistently the school delivers its curriculum. In some cases, pupils do not achieve all that they could. For example, the proportion of pupils in key stages 1 and 2 who reached the expected standards of attainment in reading in 2023 was significantly below national averages.
p.2
better?
The school has ensured that pupils experience a broad and balanced curriculum. It has clarified what pupils are expected to learn in all subjects by the end of each year. The school has made great strides in redeveloping the curriculum used in the unit for pupils with SEND, which is now appropriately ambitious for what these pupils should learn.
p.2
better?
There is some variability in how consistently subject curriculums are delivered in practice. Some learning activities are not well designed to help pupils acquire important knowledge. At times, content is not delivered in a logical, coherent manner to help pupils build their knowledge securely. Consequently, pupils’ knowledge and understanding of key concepts in some subjects are superficial.
p.2
better?
The school delivers the early years curriculum more effectively, and with greater consistency, than is the case elsewhere in the school. Staff design appropriate learning activities that help children to develop the fundamental knowledge and skills for future learning.
p.2
better?
The school has some systems in place to evaluate the quality of curriculum delivery. However, the school’s conclusions about the curriculum are not incisive enough. Consequently, the school, including governors, does not have a sufficient awareness of the weaknesses in curriculum delivery and the impact that such issues have on what pupils learn and remember over time. Primary School 8 and 9 May 2024
p.2
3
Since the last inspection, the school has ensured that all pupils benefit from the same ambitious phonics programme. Staff adhere to the school’s expectations for how this programme should be delivered. The school ensures that pupils learn phonics as soon as they join in the early years. However, for pupils in key stage 1 and beyond, the school does not provide them with books that match their current reading knowledge and abilities. These books are often too difficult for pupils to practise the sounds that they are learning. Consequently, pupils struggle unduly when at the early stages of learning to read. Those who need extra support to catch up in their reading receive extra help, but this sometimes lacks precision. As a result, pupils do not have ample opportunities to address their individual gaps in phonics knowledge. These pupils do not become fluent readers quickly enough.
p.3
3
As was found in the previous inspection, the school’s checks on what pupils know and remember are not robust. Some of the strategies that the school uses to check on pupils’ learning do not effectively identify and address the errors and misconceptions that pupils have.
p.3
3
The school ensures that pupils with SEND are identified early. It provides staff with appropriate information and guidance on how the delivery of the curriculum might need to be adapted in order to meet these pupils’ additional needs.
p.3
3
The school has given careful thought to curriculum enhancements that broaden pupils’ personal development. It works with community partners to teach pupils how to stay safe online. It has introduced an additional programme focused on helping pupils to manage their emotions in a positive way. Pupils learn about people’s various cultures, beliefs and backgrounds. They have a positive appreciation for the differences of others. Pupils enjoy the residential visits that are arranged for them, during which they participate in outdoor confidence-building activities.
p.3
3
The school ensures that attendance is a high priority. It takes effective action to remove barriers that prevent pupils from attending regularly. The school has implemented behaviour-related policies and practices that are rooted in building positive relationships with pupils. In most lessons, pupils were observed by inspectors behaving well. However, pupils do not consistently adhere to the school’s expectations of conduct, especially during unstructured times. For example, pupils were observed running along corridors and engaging in inappropriate play. Occasionally, these behaviours are not addressed effectively or in line with the school’s policies. This conduct sometimes puts pupils at risk of potential harm.
p.3
3
Staff are proud to work at the school. They reported that leaders take responsive actions to help them to manage their workload. Early careers teachers are well supported by able mentors. Governors understand their duties and typically carry them out sufficiently well.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Primary School 8 and 9 May 2024
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school, including governors, lacks sufficient insight into the delivery of the curriculum and how well it helps pupils to acquire new knowledge. As a result, the school is not addressing the deficiencies in curriculum design and delivery that are currently evident. These deficiencies prevent pupils from developing a secure body of knowledge. The school should review how it evaluates the effectiveness of subject curriculums so that it can identify and respond to the weaknesses in curriculum delivery. The school does not carry out effective checks on pupils’ learning. This sometimes means that staff do not identify when pupils are struggling with their learning. In turn, pupils do not receive enough help and guidance to address their misconceptions and errors. The school should make sure that staff have sufficient strategies to identify and respond to pupils who need further guidance with their
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
learning. The school’s phonics catch-up support does not sharply focus on addressing pupils’ individual knowledge gaps. Additionally, the books that pupils read are not well suited to their current knowledge of sounds. Consequently, pupils struggle at the early stages of learning to read for longer than they should. The school should ensure that pupils are provided with accessible books that match well to their current reading abilities and ensure that catch-up support helps pupils to close their individual knowledge gaps. The school does not consistently uphold high standards of behaviour and conduct throughout the school day. Particularly during social times, pupils do not behave as well as they should. This sometimes puts them at risk of harm. The school should ensure that its policies and procedures related to behaviour management are clearly understood and routinely upheld by staff and pupils.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school. Primary School 8 and 9 May 2024
p.4
5
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). Primary School 8 and 9 May 2024
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
School details
Chair of governing body Simon Butterworth
p.6
School details
Dates of previous inspection 21 and 22 March 2023, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
There have been alterations to the senior leadership structure since the previous inspection. A deputy headteacher and assistant headteacher have been appointed to substantive posts since the last inspection. Leaders do not currently make use of alternative provision. There is a SEND unit at the school for up to eight pupils with speech, language and communication needs and autistic spectrum disorder. There are currently seven pupils who are part of this unit. The school operates a before-school club at the school, which the governing body oversees. The school is a voluntary-aided Church of England primary school. The most recent section 48 inspection of the school’s religious character took place in November 2017. The school is awaiting confirmation from the diocese about its next section 48 inspection. Primary School 8 and 9 May 2024
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors conducted deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, art and design, history and geography. They met with subject leaders and teachers. They visited lessons, looked at examples of pupils’ work and talked with groups of pupils about their learning. The lead inspector observed pupils read to a familiar adult. Inspectors also considered the curriculum, spoke with pupils about their learning and evaluated their work in some other subjects. The lead inspector spoke with a group of governors. Inspectors also talked to staff about their workload and well-being. The lead inspector spoke with a representative of the local authority and the diocese.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors met with the leaders who are responsible for attendance, behaviour and pupils’ personal development. Inspectors spoke with pupils about their wider experience of school. Inspectors looked at a range of policies and documents related to pupils’ welfare and education. They observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors took account of the responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff. There were no responses to the pupil survey. Inspectors met with parents at the start of the school day and took account of the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses.
p.7
Inspection team
David Spruce, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Rachael Alarcon Ofsted Inspector Primary School 8 and 9 May 2024
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion