Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Tweedmouth Community Middle School

Inspected 5 Jun 2024 · published 2 Jul 2024 · URN 122348

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dan McKeating (lead), Karen Gammack

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Jun 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Dan McKeating, Karen Gammack

  • Postcode verified

    TD15 2DJ

  • Name on report verified

    Tweedmouth Community Middle School

  • URN verified

    122348

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+9Mostly positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh-qualityeffectivehigh expectationsvery wellconsistentlyhappysafepositive
Criticismweakerinconsistentnot consistentlyseriousinconsistentlynot secureconcernsvariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1240w+7
  • Safeguarding11w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,245
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 1%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Tweedmouth Community Middle School Billendean Terrace, Spittal, Berwick-upon-Tweed, Northumberland TD15 2DJ

p.1

Outcome

Tweedmouth Community Middle School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Tweedmouth Community Middle School is a welcoming school. Pupils are happy and safe. Staff care deeply about the pupils. They have high expectations for what pupils can achieve and an unwavering determination to ensure that pupils receive a high-quality education. They strive to ensure that every pupil ‘can be the very best that they can be’.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school is as equally committed to pupils’ character development as it is to pupils’ academic progress. The school provides a broad range of wider opportunities for pupils. These enrich pupils’ experience of school. For example, pupils take part in a national mathematics challenge, enter competitions such as a recent robotics event, learn from authors who contribute to the Berwick Literary Festival and visit local art galleries. Pupils develop wider skills in communication and teamwork. Pupils’ levels of independence and resilience are well developed. Pupils greet adults they pass on the corridor warmly and maturely. Incidents of bullying are very rare.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

During the inspection, many parents expressed their sincere thanks for the positive influence of the school on their child’s development. One parent captured the view of many when they described the school as a ‘lovely school, very approachable, providing great learning opportunities’.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Pupils study a broad curriculum. The school has identified the important knowledge and skills that pupils should understand. The curriculum is clearly sequenced. The school has high ambition for all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has developed an approach to teaching that aims to help all pupils to make the progress they are capable of making. This is known in school as ‘5-a-day’. Aspects of this are well embedded, such as the use of technology. This supports learning well. Careful grouping of pupils in lessons ensures they get the level of support they need. 4 and 5 June 2024

p.1

2

Other aspects of 5-a-day are used less consistently. For example, in some lessons, the quality of modelling, checking understanding and using scaffolds to support pupils in their learning is more variable. Pupils with SEND are supported very well. Teachers receive appropriate training. They have access to detailed information about pupils with SEND and their individual needs. Pupils’ needs are well met.

p.2

2

In most subjects, the school enters key stage 3 pupils for an academic award with a national examination board. Most pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, achieve the award. To achieve it, pupils produce high-quality work. This is preparing pupils well for the academic demands of high school.

p.2

2

Pupils read for pleasure every day in school. They enjoy reading. The support for the few pupils who have weaker reading skills, or who are at the earliest stages of reading, is inconsistent. Some staff need training on the school’s phonics programme. The school needs to check the progress of weaker readers more closely to ensure that appropriate levels of support are put in place.

p.2

2

The school’s behaviour policy is clear and implemented consistently. Pupils value the emphasis on rewards. They behave well in lessons. Pupils in key stage 2 are particularly enthusiastic about their learning. At social times, pupils mix well together. Routines are well embedded, including pupils cleaning their tables after lunch. Most pupils attend regularly. The school tracks attendance carefully. Leaders implement effective support to improve pupils’ attendance, where it is needed.

p.2

2

Much work has been done to develop pupils’ confidence. Most pupils participate in the extra-curricular opportunities provided by the school. These include a range of sports, drama, music and academic clubs. The school has designed a curriculum to develop pupils’ speaking skills through ‘Talk Time’, so pupils feel more assured when they express themselves. Pupils are articulate. They understand how to keep themselves safe online. Pupils know about healthy relationships. They are encouraged to play an active role in the school and local community. Pupils tend to the school’s flowerbeds, support the upkeep of community gardens, contribute to the ‘Tweed 1000’ tapestry and are members of the school council.

p.2

2

Leaders, including governors, are effective. They have an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and areas to develop. Sometimes, some leaders do not check the school’s work as consistently as they could. Leaders are not consistently aware of the impact of their work. A programme for subject leaders has been reintroduced to provide them with ongoing professional development and support.

p.2

2

Staff enjoy working at the school. They say that leaders are supportive. They value the opportunities such as ‘well-being meetings’ that bring the staff together. In addition, they value the ways that leaders have helped them with their workload.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 4 and 5 June 2024

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The approach to supporting weaker readers is inconsistent. Pupils who are at the earliest stages of reading or who require support, do not develop their ability to read as quickly as they could. The school should ensure that there is greater consistency in the ways it supports those pupils who have difficulty with reading or who are at the early stages of learning to read.  In some lessons, elements of the school’s 5-a-day approach to teaching are used inconsistently. This means that pupils do not secure their understanding or progress through the curriculum as well as they could. The school should ensure pupils embed their knowledge and make the progress of which they are capable.  There is some variation in the ways that leaders quality assure the school’s work. As a result, the impact of some of the school’s improvement initiatives is unclear. The school should ensure school improvement initiatives are checked systematically and

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in February 2019.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school. 4 and 5 June 2024

p.3

4

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 4 and 5 June 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Co-Chairs of governing body Gavin Wilson and Rikki Renner

p.5

School details

Website tweedmouth.northumberland.sch.uk

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 27 and 28 February 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school does not use any alternative provision.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors carried out this ungraded inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.  Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspection team held meetings with the headteacher, senior leaders, middle leaders, teachers and pupils. 4 and 5 June 2024

p.5

6

 The lead inspector met with members of the local governing body.  The inspection team carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics and art and design. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The lead inspector met with subject leaders in science and French to discuss the curriculum in these subjects.  Inspectors met with the special educational needs and/or disabilities coordinator.  The lead inspector met with the leaders responsible for behaviour and attendance.  Inspectors met with the leaders in charge of the personal, social, health and economic curriculum and pupils’ personal development.  The lead inspector met with a representative from the local authority.  The lead inspector met with members of non-teaching staff.

p.6

6

 The inspectors observed pupils during social times.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The lead inspector considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View. He also took into consideration the responses to the surveys for staff and for pupils.

p.6

Inspection team

Dan McKeating, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Karen Gammack Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 June 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion