Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Christleton High School
Summary
Jenny Jones (lead), Craig Yates, Elaine Mawson, Geoff Baker, Nick Lowry, Tuesday Humby
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 May 2024
- Inspectors verified
Craig Yates, Elaine Mawson, Geoff Baker, Jenny Jones, Nick Lowry, Tuesday Humby
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CH3 7AD
- Name on report verified
Christleton High School
- URN verified
136645
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils are provided with high-quality information that empowers them to make ambitious and informed choices about their futures. p.3
- This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 nine years ago and was judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. p.1
- The school has high expectations of pupils’ achievement. p.2
- They engage positively in lessons and are enthusiastic about learning. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Nevertheless, in other subjects across the curriculum, teachers do not adapt teaching as well as they should for pupils with SEND. p.3
- Teachers are clear about what it is that they need to teach and the order in which it should be taught. p.2
- The school should ensure that its processes for monitoring are sharpened so that it can accurately identify and address any specific areas for improvement. p.4
- The school should ensure that teachers are clear about the most appropriate teaching strategies to employ in their subject and that they are supported to use these well so the curriculum can be delivered as intended. p.4
- This means that some pupils do not receive the help that they need to help them to read confidently and fluently. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment9
“There are some inconsistencies in teachers’ pedagogical choices.” p.4Progress & outcomes6
“The school has high expectations of pupils’ achievement.” p.2Personal development5
“Furthermore, younger pupils also run clubs, such as role-playing games.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,230
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Christleton High School Village Road, Christleton, Chester, Cheshire CH3 7AD
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The headteacher of this school is Kevin Smith. This school is part of The Learning Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Darran Jones, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Euan Imrie.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 nine years ago and was judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time. From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. 8 and 9 May 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils find where they belong in the cheerful community at Christleton High School. Most pupils are happy and flourish. The five Cs of ‘collaborative, committed, creative, caring and cheerful’ underpin everything that the school does.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has high expectations of pupils’ achievement. Pupils benefit from the school’s carefully designed curriculum and achieve well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has equipped pupils successfully with ‘learning habits’. Typically, pupils behave well. They engage positively in lessons and are enthusiastic about learning. Pupils want to do their best and to succeed academically.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s magazine ‘The Swan’ is crammed full of exciting experiences that pupils have undertaken. These include trips abroad, whole-school musical productions and opportunities to explore subjects further, such as in Science Week. A significant number of pupils take up the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award up to the gold level, which helps them to develop into confident young adults. Furthermore, younger pupils also run clubs, such as role-playing games. ‘Hot scholars’ enthusiastically share their passion for a subject. For instance, English hot scholars recorded readings of war poetry for their peers. Students in the sixth form also benefit from a variety of enrichment opportunities that contribute towards their wider development, such as first aid, model United Nations and mindfulness clubs.
p.2
better?
Pupils benefit from a broad and ambitious curriculum that allows them to connect new ideas to previous learning. Teachers are clear about what it is that they need to teach and the order in which it should be taught. They are highly knowledgeable about the subjects that they teach.
p.2
better?
In many subjects, the curriculum is delivered well. For example, retrieval activities are designed to help pupils to recall their prior learning successfully. Activities are carefully chosen to help pupils to consolidate their knowledge. However, from time to time, there are inconsistencies in how well the curriculum is delivered. For example, some teachers do not routinely check if pupils have understood what they have been taught. As a result, a minority of pupils develop misconceptions of which teachers are not aware.
p.2
better?
In the main, pupils’ work demonstrates that they know more and remember more. They are confident in recalling their learning over time. Overall, they develop a secure body of knowledge. Students in the sixth form could clearly articulate their understanding of the subjects that they have studied. They reflect well on their work and use the feedback that teachers give them effectively to move their learning on. Consequently, students in the sixth form achieve well. 8 and 9 May 2024
p.2
3
The school’s processes for checking on how well the curriculum is delivered are not used well enough. Some leaders lack the confidence to be able to identify areas of weakness and the specific strategies needed for improvement. This contributes to an over-generous evaluation of the quality of education and hinders how quickly improvements can be made.
p.3
3
At present, the school does not systematically assess all pupils’ reading knowledge. This means that some pupils do not receive the help that they need to help them to read confidently and fluently. However, the school has a clear strategy to address this moving forward.
p.3
3
The school identifies pupils’ additional needs accurately. The provision for a small number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) in the nurture class is used effectively. This allows these pupils to access the same curriculum as their peers. Nevertheless, in other subjects across the curriculum, teachers do not adapt teaching as well as they should for pupils with SEND. This means that a minority of pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they could.
p.3
3
The school has increased the size and capacity of the pastoral team to meet the increasing challenging needs that a small number of pupils have. Pupils benefit from safe spaces, such as ‘The Hive’, to help them to manage their emotional well-being. Pupils follow the school’s rules. Most pupils show respect towards one another.
p.3
3
There is a very comprehensive programme of careers information and guidance. This includes work experience, meetings with careers advisors and engagement with employers. The school is aspirational for its pupils. Former pupils’ progression to university, apprenticeships and employment is celebrated to inspire pupils who are currently in the school. Pupils are provided with high-quality information that empowers them to make ambitious and informed choices about their futures. Pupils understand fundamental British values. They understand and respect the different beliefs and opinions that others may hold.
p.3
3
The governors and trustees work closely with the school to continue to refine the quality of education that the school provides. They offer robust challenge to the school. Staff think that the school is particularly considerate about their well-being. They said that the school listens to them and supports them well. Staff appreciate the generous amount of time that is built into the calendar for their professional development.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 8 and 9 May 2024
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
There are some inconsistencies in teachers’ pedagogical choices. As a result, a small number of pupils, including those with SEND, do not achieve as well as they could. The school should ensure that teachers are clear about the most appropriate teaching strategies to employ in their subject and that they are supported to use these well so the curriculum can be delivered as intended. The school’s systems to check on how well the curriculum is delivered do not identify weaknesses in practice well enough. This slows down the school’s work to make improvements to the quality of education. The school should ensure that its processes for monitoring are sharpened so that it can accurately identify and address any specific areas for improvement.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 8 and 9 May 2024
p.4
School details
Local authority Cheshire West and Chester
p.5
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1391
p.5
sixth form
Dates of previous inspection 8 and 9 November 2014 under Section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school makes use of three registered and three unregistered alternative providers for a small number of pupils. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 8 and 9 May 2024
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school's education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: science, mathematics, modern foreign languages, physical education, design and technology and history. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also visited lessons in some other subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive
p.6
6
culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspectors met with the headteacher, other senior leaders, the CEO, representatives of the board of trustees, including the chair, representatives of the governing body, including one of the joint chairs, a representative of the local authority and the school improvement advisor. Inspectors spoke to groups of pupils from Years 7 to 13 about their experience of school and their views on behaviour and bullying. Inspectors also observed pupils’ behaviour at breaktimes and lunchtimes. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free- text responses. There were no responses to Ofsted’s survey for staff and pupils. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation, including the school’s self- evaluation document, the academy development plan, minutes of trustee and governor meetings and records of pupils’ behaviour and attendance.
p.6
Inspection team
Jenny Jones, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Elaine Mawson His Majesty's Inspector 8 and 9 May 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion