Early years · Early years compliance action
Childminder in Barnsley
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
28 Jun 2024
- URN verified
EY500528
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 330
- about usual (typical 317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 35
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 14 March 2024, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 10 May 2024, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their last inspection.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On this visit we found that the provider was continuing to improve their knowledge and understanding of their roles and responsibilities through training, reading, and working with other professionals. Training on managing children's behaviour, and further liaison with parents and other providers, is helping the childminder to implement consistent boundaries with children. The childminder has plans in place to complete regular supervisions of her assistants. This will enable her to further support their continuous professional development. The childminder had reviewed the foods she provides to ensure children benefit from a balanced diet. For example, she now no longer provides children with chocolate cereals for breakfast. The childminder understands the importance of ensuring that children are constantly supervised while they are eating to ensure their safety. She uses a range of books and props to increase children's knowledge on developing good oral health. She also
p.1
Summary of outcome
provides all children with opportunities to clean their teeth while they are in her care. The childminder is working closely with other professionals to ensure children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are supported and have their needs met.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion