Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Duxford Church of England Community Primary School

Inspected 22 May 2024 · published 28 Jun 2024 · URN 110798

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christine Dick

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 May 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Christine Dick

  • Postcode verified

    CB22 4RA

  • Name on report verified

    Duxford Church of England Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    110798

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 26% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationseagerenthusiasmproudimprovinghappyenjoywell prepared
Criticismnot securegapsseriousinconsistencyseriouslyconcernslower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1228w+31
  • Safeguarding11w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,237
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 1%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Duxford Church of England Community Primary School St John’s Street, Duxford, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB22 4RA

p.1

Outcome

Duxford Church of England Community Primary School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy learning in this welcoming and friendly school. From the early years onwards, they understand the importance of kindness and respect. Most pupils live up to the school’s high expectations. When, occasionally, a few pupils find it harder to behave as well as they should, staff provide the support needed to ensure that behaviour improves. Bullying is rare and dealt with quickly if it happens. Pupils know that they have a trusted adult who will help if they are worried.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Reading is important to pupils because it is thoughtfully threaded through all aspects of the curriculum. They enjoy reading together in lessons and speak excitedly about the stories that they share. Children in the Reception class are eager to show their understanding of the letters and sounds that they know.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The range of clubs, for example girls’ football and eco-clubs, are well attended. Pupils are eager to take on positions of responsibility, such as school councillors or house captains. These young leaders make a real difference in improving the school’s environment and in promoting charity events. The curriculum and the wider opportunities ensure that pupils are well prepared to move on to the next stage of their education.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The curriculum is designed appropriately to promote the school’s values and its ‘AIMS’, supporting pupils to be attentive, imaginative, motivated and spiritual. Most pupils live out these aims, as reflected in their enthusiasm, improving achievement and interest in learning. Regular reviews typically pinpoint any curriculum changes necessary to continue to ensure that pupils’ needs are met. The way that writing and vocabulary are taught, for example, has been strengthened. This is improving pupils’ knowledge, skills and capacity to write at length. 21 and 22 May 2024

p.1

2

In a few subjects, the school’s work to evaluate the effectiveness of the curriculum is new. Occasionally, the activities teachers set for pupils are not matched as closely as they should be to the intended learning. Where this happens, pupils do not secure their understanding of important knowledge as well as they could.

p.2

2

Classrooms are lively and interesting places to learn. In the early years, children are encouraged to be curious and to explore new ideas through communication and purposeful play. Teachers correct misconceptions and address gaps in learning. Regular checks include guidance to pupils about how to improve their work. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are well supported. Careful adaptations, for example, using smaller steps, help them to access the same learning as their peers, so they achieve well.

p.2

2

Ensuring that pupils read regularly and well is of the highest priority. Children in Reception practise their letters and sounds every day. They are rightly proud of their developing reading skills. In lessons, older pupils read with enthusiasm and expression. The school’s ambition to embed a love of reading is widely promoted and typically realised.

p.2

2

Younger pupils who have fallen behind with their reading are supported to catch up quickly. However, the school’s approach to supporting older pupils who find reading tricky is not as well established. While the school has provided some training, there is more to do to ensure that staff have the secure subject knowledge that they need. This inconsistency means that for some older pupils, the gaps in their phonics knowledge also limit the accuracy of their spelling and writing.

p.2

2

Pupils are proud of their school and keen to share their experiences. They learn how to keep safe in different situations, including when playing games online. New pupils are warmly welcomed and so they settle in quickly. In the early years, children understand and respond well to clear routines. This is because adults use consistent language and model high expectations systematically.

p.2

2

Well-considered arrangements support pupils’ highly positive personal development. Pupils are polite and responsive to visitors. They are tolerant and respectful of one another. These important characteristics are regularly revisited in themed assemblies and personal, social and health education. Pupil leaders take their roles very seriously. They ensure that they represent the views of their peers in suggesting ideas to improve the school environment. Recent changes include, for example, improvements to the playground and outdoor areas.

p.2

2

Staff value the support of the school community. They appreciate the attention that leaders and governors give to their professional development, as well as the importance placed on their well-being. Governors have a wide range of expertise. They play their part in ensuring that the quality of education remains good and that safeguarding responsibilities are met.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 21 and 22 May 2024

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Support for older pupils who find reading difficult is not as well developed as it is for younger pupils. The gaps in some older pupils’ phonics knowledge result in inaccuracies in their spelling. This impacts negatively on their writing. The school should ensure all staff have the knowledge and skills to support older pupils who need help with their reading and spelling.  In a few subjects, the school is still evaluating curriculum changes to see what is working well and what needs to improve. In these subjects, there are occasions where teachers do not set work that is as carefully matched to the intended learning as it should be. In these instances, pupils do not secure their understanding of important knowledge as well as they could. The school should ensure that subject leaders have the ongoing support needed to identify and implement further improvements accurately.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour, or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in January 2015.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school. 21 and 22 May 2024

p.3

4

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 21 and 22 May 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Headteachers Suzanne Blackburne-Maze and Sarah Medley (Co-Headteachers) Website www.duxford.cambs.sch.uk

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 27 November 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 There has been a change in the senior leadership structure since the November 2018 inspection. The previous headteacher is now one of two co-headteachers. They have shared responsibilities for running the school.  The rebuilt premises were completed in 2023, following fire damage in 2020 and the location in temporary classrooms as a result.  The number of pupils with SEND on the school’s roll has increased since the pandemic.  The school occasionally uses one registered, local authority-approved alternative provision.  The most recent inspection of the school’s denominational education and collective worship, under section 48 of the Education Act 2005, took place in April 2024. The next section 48 inspection is due within eight years of this date.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic 21 and 22 May 2024

p.5

6

began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspector conducted deep dives in the following subjects: English, including early reading, mathematics and history. To complete each deep dive, the inspector discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons and spoke with teachers. She also listened to pupils reading to a familiar adult, spoke with pupils about their learning and looked at samples of their work.  A wider sample of curriculum was considered beyond the deep dives, including in science and geography.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector looked at safeguarding policies, the school’s record of pre-employment checks on new staff and a sample of child protection files. She took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture

p.6

6

around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The lead inspector spoke with a group of governors, including the chair of governors. Meetings were held with the co-headteachers and other leaders, including leaders with oversight of support for pupils with SEND, behaviour and attendance.  A range of documents were checked, including behaviour logs, attendance records, minutes of governors’ meetings, school improvement plans and school policies.  The inspector also spoke with a school improvement partner and a representative of the Diocese of Ely.  There were 42 responses to the online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, which were considered alongside 43 free-text responses from parents. The inspectors also considered the 61 responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for school pupils and 20 responses to the questionnaire for school staff.

p.6

Inspection team

Christine Dick, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 21 and 22 May 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion