Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Sherwood Foundation School

Inspected 10 May 2024 · published 27 Jun 2024 · URN 103025

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Francis Gonzalez (lead), Lucy Wijsveld

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 May 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Francis Gonzalez, Lucy Wijsveld

  • Postcode verified

    SM6 7NP

  • Name on report verified

    Sherwood Park School

  • URN verified

    103025

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 51% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallythrivestrongtrusting relationshipsnurturingskilfullypositiveengaging
Criticismseriousconcernslower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1060w+48
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,065
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Sherwood Park School Streeters Lane, Wallington, Surrey SM6 7NP

p.1

Outcome

Sherwood Park School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Sherwood Park School provides a nurturing environment in which pupils thrive. Its commitment to ‘breaking the mould’ is not only a slogan, but a practice that is woven into the fabric of the school’s culture.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ welfare, care and safety are at the centre of everything that staff do. Staff forge strong and trusting relationships with pupils based on an acute understanding of their individual needs. This supports pupils to develop their self-regulation skills and their independence particularly well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Not surprisingly, pupils like attending this school. They make friends and play together at breaktimes and lunchtimes. Due to their special educational needs, some pupils find it difficult to understand what bullying is. However, they know adults will help them deal with any worries they may have. Occasionally, pupils become agitated or distressed because they are confused or frustrated. Adults skilfully help pupils at these times so that lessons are rarely disrupted. Most parents and carers reported a substantial positive impact on their child’s development since joining the school.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Most pupils are not ready for the national curriculum and follow a personalised programme. Leaders have structured the curriculum into four pathways. They have designed these to meet pupils’ additional needs. The informal pathways provide appropriate learning opportunities for pupils. Pupils’ sensory and communication needs are well provided for through these pathways. Work is underway to develop the curriculum further for those that can access more formal learning, particularly in mathematics.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The whole-school approach to literacy, catering to a range of readers, shows a firm commitment to every pupil being a reader and a writer. This is irrespective of the 9 and 10 May 2024

p.1

2

complexity of pupils’ needs, and includes pupils who are symbols-based communicators and those with physical disabilities that mean they are unable to write unaided.

p.2

2

Pupils’ personal development is a large part of school life. This aspect of the curriculum is carefully planned. Leaders provide an extensive range of activities that help to develop pupils’ understanding of the wider world. These include trips to the supermarket, farms and to the aquarium.

p.2

2

The school provides pupils with valuable, age-appropriate information on relationships and sex education and health education. Pupils respect and celebrate the many differences between themselves and others. Parents appreciate the school’s consideration of their child’s spirituality and individuality, creating an inclusive environment that celebrates diversity, such as hosting a ‘Pride disco’ and taking pupils on church visits. The engaging displays and welcoming atmosphere reflect the school’s vibrant and inclusive culture.

p.2

2

Staff ably use a wide range of resources, such as objects of reference, signs, symbols and technology. This helps pupils who are non-verbal to communicate their wishes and to make choices and contributes to creating a school where every pupil has a voice.

p.2

2

Pupils are prepared exceptionally well to be confident, independent and ready for adulthood. This is helped by providing meaningful opportunities for pupils to use their skills and contribute to the life of the school, for example with filling up soap dispensers, collecting leaves, and even fundraising for people who are suffering.

p.2

2

In recent years, the school has moved to an approach that helps pupils learn how to self- regulate or seek the support of staff when they cannot do this on their own. This has led to a significant improvement in the behaviour of some pupils. While challenges persist around the shift to a new culture, steps are being taken to address these issues.

p.2

2

The school works closely with parents to understand and address any barriers that may prevent pupils from attending school. Most pupils attend school regularly.

p.2

2

Governors and leaders are committed to transparency, pupil welfare and staff collaboration. Most staff feel supported and carry out their roles with a high degree of integrity. They have welcomed recent changes to assessment that have helped to improve their workload and well-being.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school’s curriculum for pupils who can access more formal learning is not as well set out and sequenced as for the other pathways. This means that some pupils who 9 and 10 May 2024

p.2

3

are ready for more formal learning do not make as much progress as they could. Leaders should complete the process of implementing the new curriculum. They should ensure that the essential knowledge that pupils need to learn over time is set out for all pathways.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged school to be good in October 2013.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘ disadvantaged pupils ’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 9 and 10 May 2024

p.3

form

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.4

form

Date of previous inspection 14 November 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 This is a special school for pupils between the ages of two and 19 years.  All pupils in this school have special educational needs and/or disabilities.  The school caters for pupils with autism and profound learning difficulties.  The school does not use any alternative provision.  The school has two sites. These are: - Sherwood Park Campus, Streeters Lane, Wallington SM6 7NP - Sherwood Hill Campus, Stanley Park Road, Carshalton SM5 3HW 9 and 10 May 2024

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  During the inspection, inspectors held discussions with the headteacher and other leaders, including curriculum and pastoral leaders.  Inspectors held discussions with teachers, teaching assistants, health staff and governors.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics and personal, social, health and economic education. For each of these subjects, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors met with members of staff individually and in groups and spoke to pupils at

p.5

Information about this inspection

various points during the inspection. Inspectors took account of responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s survey for parents, and Ofsted’s surveys for pupils and staff.  Inspectors looked at records relating to behaviour, bullying and attendance.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.5

Inspection team

Francis Gonzalez, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.5

Inspection team

Lucy Wijsveld Ofsted Inspector 9 and 10 May 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion