Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Bredbury St. Marks CofE Primary School

Inspected 22 May 2024 · published 27 Jun 2024 · URN 147723

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 May 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Kathy Nichol, Rachel Pars

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SK6 1BX

  • Name on report verified

    Bredbury St. Marks CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    147723

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 12% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiouseffectivesuccessfullyhigh expectationsstronghigh-qualitystrong relationshipshappy
Criticismgapsweakweaknessesinsufficienttoo manylimitedbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1266w+32
  • Safeguarding11w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,252
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 1%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of Bredbury St. Marks CofE Primary School Redhouse Lane, Bredbury, Stockport, Cheshire SK6 1BX

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The headteacher of this school is Emma Harding. This school is part of Chester Diocesan Academies Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Neil Dixon, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by John Mason. 21 and 22 May 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy in school. They feel part of the St. Mark’s community and know that they matter. Pupils value the school’s warm and welcoming environment. They help to make everyone feel included in their school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

In recent years, the school has raised its expectations of what pupils should achieve, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The school has created a broad, balanced and ambitious curriculum from the early years to Year 6. The impact of this work is increasingly seen in how well pupils achieve.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils typically behave well. This means that learning is rarely disrupted. Pupils follow the school rules. They relish the many responsibilities that they are given, such as becoming librarians and ethos councillors. This helps pupils to feel trusted and valued. Pupils know that they can talk to adults in school if there is a problem, and that they will be given the help that they need. As a result, pupils feel safe and ready to learn.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are enthused by the opportunities afforded to them beyond the classroom, such as clubs, trips and visits. They embrace the 50 experiences that the school provides to expand and deepen their learning. These include attending a residential visit, attempting a world record and jumping in puddles.

p.2

better?

The school has been through recent turmoil and change. Pupils’ attainment and progress in reading and mathematics at the end of Year 6 was significantly below the national average in 2023. The impact of changes in staffing, the COVID-19 pandemic and weak curriculums, meant that pupils had too many gaps in their learning to achieve as well as they should. The school has engaged positively with the trust to strengthen subject curriculums and to improve the way that these are delivered. As a result, pupils are better equipped with the knowledge and skills that they need for the next stage of their education.

p.2

better?

The school has designed a well-thought-out curriculum. It has thought carefully about how to meet pupils’ needs. The additional needs of pupils with SEND are identified early. Staff have received the training that they need to make sure that these pupils can learn successfully alongside their peers.

p.2

better?

In a few subjects, the curriculum has only recently been revised. Some older pupils have insufficient prior knowledge to build on. On occasion, teachers do not carefully consider how to address gaps in pupils’ learning before introducing new subject content. Consequently, some pupils do not achieve as highly as they should. 21 and 22 May 2024

p.2

3

Most staff have strong subject knowledge. They present information clearly and select activities that support pupils to recall new learning. However, the school’s approaches to assessment are underdeveloped in a small number of subjects. While teachers identify how well pupils have remembered recent knowledge in these subjects, they do not check how well pupils retain key knowledge in their long-term memory. This hinders how well teachers build on what pupils already know.

p.3

3

The curriculum is underpinned by high-quality texts. Pupils are excited about the development of their library, including the new books that are available to them. In the early years, children enjoy sharing books and joining in with known stories and rhymes. Children are ready to learn to read using phonics from the start of the Reception Year. The school has ensured that staff deliver the phonics programme successfully. Most pupils learn to read well. The school provides timely and effective support to any pupils who find learning to read a challenge.

p.3

3

Children in the early years settle into school routines quickly. Staff get to know children well and build strong relationships with them. Children engage with their learning enthusiastically. They concentrate for increasing periods of time.

p.3

3

The school has not ensured that some early years staff have the expertise to strengthen children’s learning. On occasion, some staff’s interactions mainly guide children or involve closed questions. When this happens, children have limited opportunities to make decisions or to think more deeply about their learning. This hinders how well some children in the early years achieve.

p.3

3

Pupils’ attitudes to their learning are positive. The school is relentless in its efforts to improve attendance where this falls short of its high expectations. Working alongside external agencies, the school has developed effective strategies to support pupils and their families. These strategies are improving pupils’ attendance.

p.3

3

The school’s curriculum supports pupils to understand and accept difference. Pupils learn about the importance of a healthy relationship. They know how to keep mentally and physically well. For example, pupils understand that it is important to eat and drink a range of foods to stay healthy.

p.3

3

The local governing board is new. Members of the board have quickly developed their knowledge of the school. The school carefully considers how its decisions impact on staff’s workload. Staff value this and feel listened to, cared for and appreciated.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 21 and 22 May 2024

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In a few subjects, weaknesses in previous curriculums mean that older pupils have some gaps in their knowledge. This makes it more difficult for them to build securely on what they already know. The school should ensure that teachers address pupils’ knowledge gaps so that they can achieve the ambitious outcomes of new subject curriculums.  In a small number of subjects, the assessment of pupils’ learning is not refined enough to help staff to identify where some pupils have forgotten key learning over time. This means that gaps in pupils’ understanding between one topic and the next go unchecked. The school should ensure that there are checks in place to gauge pupils’ long-term retention of key subject knowledge so that staff can reinforce pupils’ learning more effectively.  The school has not ensured that some staff in the early years know how to support and enhance children’s learning through quality interactions. This means

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

that, from their individual starting points, some children do not make as much progress as they could. The school should ensure that staff in the early years receive the training they need to be able to support children to achieve as well as they can.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 21 and 22 May 2024

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of Chester Diocesan Academies Trust.  Bredbury St. Mark’s CofE Primary School converted to become an academy school in February 2020. When its predecessor school, St. Mark’s CofE Primary School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be inadequate overall.  A new headteacher, assistant headteachers and local governing board have been appointed since the previous inspection.  The school is part of the Diocese of Chester. It was last inspected under section 48 of the Education Act 2005 in March 2017. The next section 48 inspection is scheduled to take place during the next school year.  The school offers a breakfast club and after-school provision each day.  The school does not make use of any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 21 and 22 May 2024

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, the assistant headteachers and other senior leaders. Inspectors also held meetings with other staff, including those responsible for attendance and pupils’ behaviour, welfare and personal development.  The inspectors held meetings with the leaders responsible for SEND and the provision for children in the early years.  The lead inspector met with members of the local governing board, including the chair of the local governing board. She also met with the deputy chair of the trustees.  The lead inspector held telephone conversations with representatives of the local

p.6

6

authority and of the diocese.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and design and technology. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector listened to pupils from Years 1 to 3 read to a familiar adult.  Inspectors met with pupils to discuss their learning in some other subjects.  Inspectors spoke with staff about their workload and well-being. They took account of the responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.  Inspectors met with parents and reviewed the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. There were no responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils and

p.6

6

considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.6

Inspection team

Kathy Nichol, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Rachel Pars Ofsted Inspector 21 and 22 May 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion