Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Heart of England School
Summary
Mel Ford (lead), Graeme Rudland, Mike Onyon
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
23 May 2024
- Inspectors verified
Graeme Rudland, Mel Ford, Mike Onyon
- Postcode verified
CV7 7FW
- Name on report verified
Heart of England School
- URN verified
136909
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In part this is because, although pupils’ SEND needs are quickly identified, information about how to respond to these has not yet been made as easily accessible as it should be, particularly while the ongoing training seeks to improve teachers’ expertise in this important area. p.2
- This means that too many do not make the progress they should. p.3
- The school should expedite their plans to improve this aspect of the curriculum provision, taking a holistic approach that will address the poorer attendance and high number of suspensions that is a feature within this group of pupils. p.3
- They have ensured that the curriculum is carefully designed to identify what needs to be learned when. p.2
- Communication with parents is not as good as it should be. p.3
- The school should ensure that communication routes are further improved, shared with parents, and monitored for their impact. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics6
“Those who struggle with reading are very well supported.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,371
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Heart of England School Gipsy Lane, Balsall Common, Coventry, West Midlands CV7 7FW
p.1
Outcome
There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.
p.1
Outcome
The principal of this school is Jacqueline Hughes-Williams. This school is part of the Heart of England School academy trust, a single-academy trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. It is overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Anne Lycett. 22 and 23 May 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils and students in the sixth form say that they feel safe at this school because they have many ways of asking for help if they need it. They all agree that the school helps them to understand how to keep themselves safe in a range of situations.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils say that bullying does happen sometimes, but the vast majority are confident that when it does, they can report it and they will be listened to.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is usually calm and orderly during break times. Most pupils show respect for one another and for adults. Pupils and students are confident and articulate. They make visitors welcome and are keen to share their views.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
In lessons, most teachers have high expectations, and most pupils strive to achieve them. However, sometimes learning is disrupted, particularly when pupils struggle to access the curriculum, becoming frustrated as a result. This is not the case in the sixth form, where students are highly motivated, independent learners, who are very confident ask for any support they may need.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school has undertaken a rigorous review and revision of much of the curriculum. They have ensured that the curriculum is carefully designed to identify what needs to be learned when. However, the school has recognised that there is not enough focus on pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). As a result, some pupils with SEND do not make enough progress and become demotivated.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Teachers have good subject knowledge and are keen to share this with pupils. However, they do not all have the skills and understanding to select the best resources and activities to support pupils with SEND to access the curriculum. In part this is because, although pupils’ SEND needs are quickly identified, information about how to respond to these has not yet been made as easily accessible as it should be, particularly while the ongoing training seeks to improve teachers’ expertise in this important area.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school’s focus on assessment is paying dividends. Subject leaders have worked hard to ensure that the right things are being assessed in the right way at the right time. Consequently, assessment is increasingly able to rapidly identify gaps and misconceptions, which is well used to inform next steps in learning. This is supported by a simple but effective shared model of teaching and learning, which helps teachers to introduce new learning effectively and to monitor how well pupils are learning and remembering. Leaders are now working on ensuring that all staff are using this model consistently.
p.2
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Reading is a high priority in the school. Those who struggle with reading are very well supported. Reading buddies are well established and pupils spoken with all reported increased confidence in their reading as their fluency and comprehension improves. Older pupils, including sixth-form students, who act as buddies, are justifiably proud of their work to help others and the impact it is having. Dedicated reading time in tutor sessions 22 and 23 May 2024
p.2
3
and a reading programme for those who need early reading help are having a positive impact. Many pupils said that they enjoy reading and are looking forward to the opening of the new library.
p.3
3
The school has ensured that pupils have an increasingly broad range of opportunities to develop their interests and talents and to gain experiences beyond the academic curriculum. There are many clubs and activities and a comprehensive careers programme, which helps pupils and students to prepare for their next steps.
p.3
3
The school works diligently to improve overall attendance and reduce persistent absence, achieving significant success. However, the attendance of some groups of pupils is not improving at the same rate and the same groups feature too prominently in suspensions.
p.3
3
Staff are very positive about the support they receive from leaders. They feel that their workload is taken into account and that, if they need help, they will receive it.
p.3
3
Recently, leaders have taken significant steps to improve communication with parents and carers. However, the school does not always keep parents well informed about the actions they have taken to support pupils; to improve provision or to respond to parental feedback. Nor are parents always made aware of the reasons that a course of action has not been possible. This means that, sometimes, parents are not aware that their voices have been listened to.
p.3
3
School and trust leaders work well together so that all responsibilities are carried out effectively. Trustees know the school well. They provide the right balance of challenge and support to help drive further improvement.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school has not made sure that all teachers have the skills, understanding and information they require to better meet the needs of pupils with SEND. This means that too many do not make the progress they should. The school should expedite their plans to improve this aspect of the curriculum provision, taking a holistic approach that will address the poorer attendance and high number of suspensions that is a feature within this group of pupils. Communication with parents is not as good as it should be. As a result, parents do not always have a full picture of what is happening to support their child, or why. Moreover, some very positive responses by school leaders to parent voice have not been shared. This means that some parents find it more difficult to support the school and to 22 and 23 May 2024
p.3
4
recognise its aim of continual improvement. The school should ensure that communication routes are further improved, shared with parents, and monitored for their impact.
p.4
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.4
Background
This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in October
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 22 and 23 May 2024
p.4
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1245
p.5
form
Date of previous inspection 9 October 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
During this inspection an acting principal was in post. The school makes use of four registered alternative providers and one unregistered alternative provider. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 7 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 22 and 23 May 2024
p.5
6
Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the acting principal, the vice principal, assistant principals, the special educational needs coordinator and members of the board of trustees, including the chairperson. Inspectors also spoke to curriculum leaders, teachers and pupils. The lead inspector also spoke directly to some parents. Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, mathematics, science and history. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector spoke to leaders about the whole school reading curriculum and visited a reading support session. Inspectors reviewed the work of the school to improve attendance.
p.6
6
Inspectors considered the school’s work to support pupils’ wider development. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.
p.6
Inspection team
Mel Ford, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Graeme Rudland Ofsted Inspector 22 and 23 May 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion