Ladysmith Junior School

Inspection of Ladysmith Junior School Pretoria Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 2PT

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 22 and 24 May 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils thoroughly enjoy coming to Ladysmith Junior School. They attend regularly and play happily together during social times. Pupils are safe and adamant that bullying does not happen. Relationships across the school are warm and caring. Pupils know they have an adult to talk to if they have a worry.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school aspires for all pupils to receive a high-quality education. However, this ambition is not yet realised. Too many pupils do not achieve well. The quality of education they receive is not good. Some pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not reach their full potential. As a result, pupils are not prepared well for the next stage of their education. Leaders are in the process of reviewing the curriculum to improve pupils’ outcomes.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy a well-thought-out programme of extra-curricular opportunities. Both pupils and parents value these opportunities. One parent’s comment, which encapsulates the views of many, was, ‘This is a caring school, with fantastic additional opportunities’. These opportunities prepare pupils well for life in modern Britain.

p.2

better?

The school has experienced a period of change. Many staff are new to the school and early in their careers. However, leaders have galvanised a team that is determined to bring about improvements. Leaders have the confidence of the community, and staff morale is high. Nearly all staff who completed the staff survey are fully behind the leadership of the school.

p.2

better?

Nevertheless, a large proportion of the curriculum needs further development. In many areas, subject leadership is in its infancy. This has led to weaknesses in the curriculum not being identified. Leaders have not sequenced the order in which pupils should learn new concepts effectively. This means that pupils do not build on their knowledge well. Furthermore, the school does not make tenacious checks on the key concepts that the school wants pupils to remember. This leads to teachers not addressing gaps in pupils’ knowledge or misconceptions they may have.

p.2

better?

The reading curriculum is more developed. Many pupils enter the school without the fundamental reading skills that they need to be able to read fluently. Staff provide additional support to help these pupils catch up quickly, and they do. The books match the sounds that pupils know, and this helps them with their confidence. Most pupils enjoy reading. Pupils know a range of different authors and appreciate the time they have in school to read.

p.2

better?

There are mixed experiences for pupils with SEND. In some year groups, the ambition for these pupils is not strong. Personalised support is not always implemented effectively. Pupils are given activities that are not adapted well. When this happens, some pupils with SEND do not learn successfully. The oversight of 22 and 24 May 2024

p.2

3

additional funds for these pupils and disadvantaged pupils is not effective. Governors do not have sufficient understanding of how additional funding supports pupils’ achievement.

p.3

3

The school has implemented a new policy to manage pupils’ behaviour. Incidents of poor behaviour have fallen significantly. Nonetheless, where the curriculum is not well thought out, pupils’ focus wanders and some pupils engage in low-level disruption.

p.3

3

The school is proud of its work to support pupils’ personal development. Pupils learn about tolerance and respect. They learn about different cultures through trips and visitors to the school. Pupils have many opportunities to take on positions of leadership. They particularly enjoy the responsibility to look after the school’s animals and being part of the ‘sports crew’.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some foundation subjects, the curriculum is not coherently sequenced. This leads to pupils not building on their prior knowledge. Consequently, pupils do not always achieve well. The school needs to ensure that the curriculum is well thought out and supports pupils in knowing more and remembering more.  Leadership of the curriculum needs to be strengthened further. Checks are not precise enough to ensure that the curriculum is being implemented effectively. As a result, some pupils do not achieve well. The school needs to ensure that subject leaders develop their expertise in monitoring and evaluation so that they can provide effective leadership across the school.  Assessment is not fully developed. As a result, the school does not have an accurate overview of whether pupils have learned what was intended. The school needs to ensure that assessment information is used effectively to inform curriculum thinking and support pupils’ next steps in learning.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some pupils with SEND do not experience a high-quality curriculum. In addition, targeted support does not meet their academic needs consistently well. This means that some pupils do not achieve well. The school needs to ensure that pupils’ support plans and the curriculum are suitably ambitious so that these pupils achieve well.  Where the curriculum is not well thought out, low-level disruption often occurs. This hinders pupils from learning the curriculum. The school needs to ensure that all staff have consistently high expectations of pupils’ behaviour and attitudes to learning so that all pupils are able to learn effectively without interruptions. 22 and 24 May 2024

p.3

4

 Governors do not have a sharp enough understanding of how effectively the school supports disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND. They do not hold the school sufficiently to account for the impact of the additional funding provided for these pupils. Governors need to ensure that their oversight of these pupils is more precise to support improved outcomes

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 22 and 24 May 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair of governing body Annie Fletcher and Tom Butcher (Co- chairs) Headteacher Mark Wilkinson (Executive Headteacher)

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 14 November 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is a larger-than-average junior school.  The school is federated with Ladysmith Infant and Nursery School.  The school does not use any alternative education provision.  There is a breakfast club operated by the school.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken this into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with representatives from the local authority, the 22 and 24 May 2024

p.5

6

executive headteacher, the head of school, senior leaders, curriculum leaders and teaching and support staff. The lead inspector met with representatives from the governing body.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, English, modern foreign languages, computing and mathematics. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning, looked at samples of pupils’ work and listened to pupils read.  The lead inspector examined a range of documentation provided by the school, including leaders’ self-evaluation and improvement planning.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive

p.6

6

culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  An inspector spoke to parents at the start of the school day. They also considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey for parents, and the staff and pupil surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

Matt Middlemore, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Matthew Shirley Ofsted Inspector 22 and 24 May 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7