Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Sharrow Nursery, Infant and Junior School

Inspected 15 May 2024 · published 24 Jun 2024 · URN 134302

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dughall McCormick

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 May 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Dughall McCormick

  • Postcode verified

    S7 1BE

  • Name on report verified

    Sharrow Nursery, Infant and Junior School

  • URN verified

    134302

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+29Mostly positivemore positive than 24% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongambitiouseffectivelyconsistentlyhigh qualitypositivehappyproud
Criticismgapspoorseriousinconsistencyfall behindconcernsnot consistentlyslowly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1222w+28
  • Safeguarding11w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,229
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%Safeguarding 1%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Sharrow Nursery, Infant and Junior School Sitwell Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S7 1BE

p.1

Outcome

Sharrow Nursery, Infant and Junior School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Sharrow Nursery, Infant and Junior School is a place where difference is valued and celebrated. There is a deeply embedded culture of inclusivity and equality. This is demonstrated by adults and pupils alike. Strong, positive relationships underpin all the school’s work. Because of this, pupils feel happy and safe at school. The school works closely with parents and carers, particularly in support of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Parents, who shared their views during the inspection, were full of praise for the school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Throughout the school there is an atmosphere of calm, cheerful purposefulness. Instances of poor behaviour are rare. Pupils insist that there is no bullying. They know that adults would help them if there were any problems with bullying. Adults apply the school’s behaviour policy consistently. Pupils feel that everyone is treated fairly.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils attend a range of enrichment activities including after school sports clubs. These opportunities help them to develop their talents and interests. Elected representatives of the school council are proud to fulfil leadership roles in school. They value the opportunity to contribute to school improvement initiatives.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school’s ambitious curriculum follows a clear sequence of learning. The school continues to review and refine the curriculum. For example, in history, disciplinary knowledge has become a recent focus for further refinement. As a result, pupils better understand what historians do. For example, they know that historians study sources and ask, ‘What does this mean and what does it tell us about the past?’ The school has developed its own curriculum for mathematics. Mathematical knowledge and concepts are carefully sequenced to build pupils’ learning over time. In the early years children have many opportunities to develop their early mathematical knowledge. For instance, children practise counting and number recognition by matching spots on ladybirds to the correct numerals. In mathematics and in reading teachers make regular, accurate checks on 14 and 15 May 2024

p.1

2

pupils’ learning. This helps them to identify and address any gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Assessment strategies for teachers to check on learning in the wider curriculum is not as well developed. Gaps in pupils knowledge across all foundation curriculum subjects is not as secure as it is in mathematics and English.

p.2

2

There is a strong collaborative approach to teaching and learning. Staff work closely in teams to plan and teach. Pupils are encouraged and supported to work together in small groups when learning. Lessons are interesting and engaging with learning that is designed to be relevant to pupils’ lives. For example, in mathematics, problems will often include pupils’ names or contexts that will be familiar to the pupils. Pupils with SEND have their needs identified quickly and expertly. They access the same ambitious curriculum as their peers. The support for pupils with SEND is of a high quality. Pupils with SEND achieve well from a range of starting points.

p.2

2

The school has prioritised reading across the school. Pupils discuss their favourite books and authors with enthusiasm. Pupils at the early stages of learning to read have books that are closely matched to the sounds that they know. This ensures they develop confidence and greater fluency. When pupils read aloud to adults, any mistakes they make are quickly rectified. The school has introduced a programme for the teaching of phonics. Staff have been trained to teach phonics. However, there is some inconsistency in phonics lessons. Not all staff consistently apply their training. Because of this, some pupils progress more slowly with reading. Nonetheless, when pupils fall behind, they are supported well to catch up.

p.2

2

Children in the early years get off to a flying start to their education. They achieve well in relation to their starting points. Knowledgeable and well-trained staff expertly develop children’s language and communication. Familiar songs and rhymes are used in support of learning. The environment is carefully designed to meet the needs of all children and in all areas of learning.

p.2

2

There is a strong curriculum for pupils’ personal development. This curriculum is boosted by opportunities for philosophical enquiry, for example pupils often debate and discuss ‘big questions’. When discussing whether people with disabilities should be treated differently, pupils said, ‘Yes, but in a good way’. They also gave examples of less visible disabilities such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or autistic spectrum disorder.

p.2

2

Leaders and governors have a compelling vision for the school as an inclusive hub at the centre of a diverse community. Governors understand their important role well. They share the high ambitions for every pupil to achieve their best. There is an unswerving commitment to serving the pupils, their families and the community well. Staff speak positively of their experience of working at the school. They know that leaders are conscious of their workload and well-being.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 14 and 15 May 2024

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school has not ensured that all staff implement the phonics programme according to agreed methods. At times, this impedes some pupils’ progress in becoming fluent and accurate readers. The school should support staff in teaching phonics consistently and effectively.  In some subjects, assessment processes are still under development. As a result, the school is not using assessment information as effectively as it could to identify gaps in pupils' knowledge. This hinders pupils from building their knowledge well over time. The school must ensure that teachers use assessment effectively in all subjects to inform future learning.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in February 2019.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, 14 and 15 May 2024

p.3

4

looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 14 and 15 May 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date(s) of previous inspection 5 – 6 February 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school does not use alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in his evaluation of the school.  The inspector met with the headteacher and other leaders. He also met with members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority.  The inspector carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, the inspector held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The inspector examined a range of school documentation, including leaders’ self- evaluation, improvement plans, records of governance, and documentation relating to

p.5

6

attendance and pupils’ behaviour.  The inspector took account of responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, the pupils’ survey and the staff survey. The inspector spoke informally with parents at the end of the school day.  During the inspection, the inspector met with groups of pupils, both formally and during less structured parts of the day.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.6

Inspection team

Dughall McCormick, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector 14 and 15 May 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion