Other · Ofsted report
University of Cambridge
Summary
Adam Cooke (lead), Julie Pearson, Liz Smith, Lynne Williams, Mireille MacRaild
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
2 May 2024
- Inspectors verified
Adam Cooke, Julie Pearson, Liz Smith, Lynne Williams, Mireille Macraild
- Postcode verified
CB2 8PQ
- Name on report verified
University of Cambridge
- URN verified
70133
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The secondary training programme is ambitious, high-quality, cohesive and exceptionally well planned. p.5
- Trainee teachers at the University of Cambridge benefit from exceptional teaching and guidance. p.1
- Trainees develop an excellent understanding of early childhood development. p.3
- They model excellent practice in the teaching of their specialist areas. p.5
- The partnership’s high aspirations are mirrored in its exceptionally well-developed approach to improving its own practice. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,150
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 37, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 1%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
University of Cambridge Faculty of Education, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 8PQ
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
Trainee teachers at the University of Cambridge benefit from exceptional teaching and guidance. This is underpinned by a belief in research and professional development that permeates the partnership. Trainees gain an excellent grasp of the fundamental theories, traditions and approaches that teachers must master. They embrace the notion that completing this course is the start of their journey as reflective and informed practitioners, not the end.
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
Trainees are pushed to achieve the highest standards, but, equally, they are supported exceptionally well by the faculty, colleges and wider university teams. This bespoke well- being package is easily accessible and many trainees continue to use this long after they have finished the course. Trainees leave with a desire to teach pupils from every walk of life. Many go on to work in deprived communities with the children and families who need great teachers most. Trainees leave the course with a first-class understanding of the subjects they teach and how to support pupils best.
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
The centre-based training is dovetailed precisely with their school experience, allowing trainees to hone their craft and reflect on their own learning and progress. They are incredibly well prepared to hit the ground running as they enter the teaching profession. Primary age- phase Secondary age-phase
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
Overall effectiveness Outstanding Outstanding
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
The quality of education and training Outstanding Outstanding
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
Leadership and management Outstanding Outstanding
p.1
What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding Outstanding
p.1
Information about this ITE provider
◼ At the time of this inspection, there were 79 trainees in the primary age-phase and 148 trainees in the secondary age-phase. ◼ The primary and secondary phases both deliver a Post Graduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) course. On completion, this certificate counts towards 50% of a master’s degree qualification, which many trainees go on to complete. ◼ Primary trainees specialise in either early primary (ages 3 to 7) or general primary (ages 5 to 11). ◼ This year, there are trainees enrolled on the following secondary courses: art and design, biology, chemistry, Latin with classics, design and technology, English, geography, history, mathematics, modern languages, music, physics and religious studies. ◼ The provider works with approximately 200 schools who provide both trainee placements and opportunities for focused visits. These schools are mostly located in the East of England region. Most schools in the partnership were graded good or
p.2
Information about this inspection
◼ This inspection was carried out by six of His Majesty’s Inspectors and two Ofsted Inspectors. The inspection was carried out through in-person meetings, online meetings and on-site visits to partner schools and colleges. ◼ Inspectors met with the head and deputy head of faculty, programme managers and other senior leaders. ◼ The phase lead inspectors met with the partnership standing committees to discuss strategic leadership and governance arrangements. ◼ In all phases, inspectors spoke with headteachers and/or senior leaders in placement settings, curriculum leaders, professional tutors, mentors and teaching staff. They considered a range of documents, including trainee records and evidence of assessment, leaders’ self-evaluation, and improvement planning. ◼ The inspection team considered responses to Ofsted’s online survey for trainees. They also reviewed and took into account the responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff.
p.2
Information about this inspection
◼ In the primary phase, inspectors visited five placement schools and spoke with a total 28 trainees, either at their placement schools or via online meetings. They conducted focused reviews in early reading, mathematics, history and geography. Inspectors also held interviews with 15 former trainees. ◼ In the secondary phase, inspectors visited nine placement schools and spoke to 29 trainees. They conducted focused reviews in English, mathematics, science and modern foreign languages. Inspectors also held interviews with 12 former trainees. Primary phase report
p.2
better?
The curriculum, which seamlessly interweaves the core content framework, comprises six strands. Each strand helps trainees to acquire the attributes, subject knowledge and teaching skills that ensure a successful start to their career in education.
p.3
better?
Developing professional values and dispositions anchors trainees’ experience. Faculty- and school-based colleagues offer trainees highly personalised support. This tailored approach does not go unnoticed by trainees. They themselves go on to become teachers who value pupils’ individual differences and help them to overcome any barriers to learning.
p.3
better?
Trainees’ subject knowledge is first-rate. Trainees acquire the knowledge that gives them the confidence and competence to teach a broad curriculum. Well-thought-through ‘development days’ allow trainees to visit a range of schools. These visits crystalise the training for subjects such as physical education and personal, social and health education. It helps trainees to understand the part teachers play in promoting pupils’ physical and mental health.
p.3
better?
Trainees benefit greatly from the partnership’s steadfast focus on educational research. Trainees scrutinise each school of thought. They make informed decisions that elevate their teaching and encourage pupils’ love of learning. The faculty’s expertise inspires many trainees to complete a Master of Education qualification. Doing so allows trainees to contribute to the faculty’s wide body of research with the aim to raise standards in state education.
p.3
better?
Trainees develop an excellent understanding of early childhood development. In early reading, for example, trainees explore the impact on pupils of positive experiences around books and storytelling. Thought-provoking discussions about children’s literature encourage trainees to be discerning when selecting books to read to pupils. Trainees learn how children learn to distinguish environmental sounds to support them later with phonics. How course leaders set out and teach trainees about systematic synthetic phonics across the year shows in trainees’ strong understanding of how best to teach pupils to read.
p.3
better?
Course leaders cleverly weave in opportunities that cultivate trainees’ professional knowledge. This work is grounded in the reality of teaching by the partnership standing committee. Trainees learn how to safeguard pupils, manage workload and consider their own and others’ well-being.
p.3
better?
Trainees are unanimous in their praise for mentors, lead mentors and partnership tutors. Timely training, detailed documentation and crystal clear communication ensures trainees routinely receive high-quality mentoring that improves their pedagogical knowledge. Mentors appreciate, for example, how the ‘knowledge quartets’ guide them to evaluate trainees’ teaching, outline their strengths and set suitable subject-specific targets. The cyclic approach to assessment and feedback results in trainees achieving highly. Trainees receive concise career entry profiles. These allow them to hit the ground running when they start their career as teachers.
p.3
compliance criteria?
The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria. Secondary phase report
p.4
better?
The secondary training programme is ambitious, high-quality, cohesive and exceptionally well planned. It results in sought after early career teachers who are well equipped to face the challenges of the teaching profession. The expertly crafted curriculum is co-constructed with partnership schools. All the requirements of the core content framework are seamlessly threaded through.
p.5
better?
The course is structured logically and thoughtfully. Through carefully tailored experiences, trainees secure the knowledge and skills that they need over time to become confident and highly competent teachers. Working closely with the university and school-based trainers, trainees build a clear understanding of their own teacher identity as subject specialists. Trainees are equipped with a rich understanding of subject-specific theory and wider research. They use this thoughtfully to inform and refine the decisions they make in the classroom. Trainees appreciate the university’s impressive subject libraries and the expert support of the specialist library team.
p.5
better?
Highly qualified and experienced subject lecturers work closely with trainees to break down important subject content into small steps to make learning manageable. They model excellent practice in the teaching of their specialist areas. As one trainee said, the university’s subject-specific training ‘is the best of the best’.
p.5
better?
The longstanding and successful partnership ensures that the curriculum is routinely updated. Trainees thrive in this vibrant and close-knit learning community. The partnership’s high aspirations are mirrored in its exceptionally well-developed approach to improving its own practice.
p.5
better?
Trainees adapt their planning so that pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who speak English as an additional language are supported to achieve well, for example by using visual prompts and carefully calibrated, clearly defined steps in learning. Trainees are quick to correct any misconceptions, while addressing gaps in pupils’ knowledge and skills. Trainees are rightly proud of their pupils’ successes and eager for more.
p.5
better?
Mentors receive expert guidance from professional tutors, subject lecturers and the wider university team. Trainees benefit from regular professional dialogue and feedback. Clear targets focus on systematic improvement. Assessment of trainees’ academic, subject and professional practice is inextricably linked to the exceptional curriculum.
p.5
better?
Trainees understand the importance of building effective relationships with pupils, while establishing clear boundaries and expectations. They are eloquent as they speak about their research and how pupils are motivated to learn. Leaders’ clear strategic vision reflects relentlessly high ambition for trainees and the ongoing development of the partnership’s offer. The university is a significant catalyst for improvement. Schools value their place in the partnership, along with the significant impact this has on in-school staff development and pupils’ learning.
p.5
better?
The relationships across the partnership underpin the outstanding provision. Well- considered and consistent approaches ensure that trainees achieve the highest standards. The partnership is relentless in its pursuit of excellence and so the training continues to be of the highest quality.
p.6
compliance criteria?
The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.
p.6
ITE provider details
This inspection was carried out in accordance with the initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook , which sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.
p.7
ITE provider details
Type of ITE provider Higher education institution Phases provided Primary and secondary Dates of previous inspection 14 May 2018 and 1 October 2018
p.7
Inspection team
Dan Lambert, Overall lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Daniel Short, Phase lead primary His Majesty’s Inspector Christine Dick, Phase lead secondary Ofsted Inspector Adam Cooke His Majesty’s Inspector Julie Pearson Ofsted Inspector Liz Smith His Majesty’s Inspector Lynne Williams His Majesty’s Inspector Mireille Macraild His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Annex: Placement schools and colleges
Inspectors visited the following schools and colleges as part of this inspection:
p.8
Name URN ITE phases
Arbury Primary School 110664 Primary Hardwick and Cambourne Primary School 110748 Primary Millfield First and Nursery School 117309 Primary Melbourn Primary School 110614 Primary St Matthew’s Primary School 110750 Primary St Paul’s CE Primary School 110839 Primary Hardwick and Cambourne Community Primary School 110748 Primary Chesterton Community College 136887 Secondary Comberton Village College 136463 Secondary Hertfordshire and Essex High School and Science College 140786 Secondary
p.8
Name URN ITE phases
Hinchingbrooke School 137475 Secondary Leventhorpe School 137156 Secondary Saffron Walden County High School 136776 Secondary Swavesey Village College 136580 Secondary Sawston Village College 136775 Secondary The Bishop’s Stortford High School 117577 Secondary guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Name URN ITE phases
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-
p.9
Name URN ITE phases
government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
Name URN ITE phases
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Name URN ITE phases
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion