Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Sackville School

Inspected 9 May 2024 · published 20 Jun 2024 · URN 126089

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Phillip Blagg (lead), Louise Walker, Tash Hurtado

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 May 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Louise Walker, Phillip Blagg, Tash Hurtado

  • Postcode verified

    RH19 3TY

  • Name on report verified

    Sackville School

  • URN verified

    126089

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+25Mostly positivemore positive than 20% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveconsistentlyambitiousstrongclearenjoyfeel safeconfidently
Criticismconcernsnot consistentlyseriousdisruptioninconsistenciesgapslowernot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1180w+23
  • Safeguarding11w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,190
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Safeguarding 1%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Sackville School Lewes Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 3TY

p.1

Outcome

Sackville School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school is ambitious for all pupils to enjoy learning and achieve highly. Pupils benefit from the emphasis on developing skills and attitudes that support them to learn well. Across the school, pupils have a purposeful approach to learning. They explain how, through the ‘Futures’ programme, they explore the different employment and education possibilities and develop personal goals for life beyond Sackville. Pupils talk about how this helps to build their motivation to try their best.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Across the school, the majority of pupils show courtesy and consideration to others. Sixth- form students act as strong role models for these attributes. There is a sharp focus on pupils’ well-being, with the five ‘Communities’ being at the heart of this. Pupils feel safe and appreciate the pastoral support available. They talk confidently about being able to share concerns and seek advice from staff in their ‘Community’. Importantly, pupils feel known in this large school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils benefit from the broad extra-curricular programme which provides many opportunities to try new things and develop interests. They are encouraged to participate in the wide range of clubs, trips and opportunities to participate in competitions or drama productions. Pupils particularly like how aspects of trips are linked to their learning.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school curriculum is carefully designed and broad. Pupils value the range of subject choices in key stage 4 and the sixth form. Across subjects, curriculum thinking identifies and arranges the precise knowledge and skills that pupils need to learn. This helps pupils to build increasingly complex understanding from Year 7 to Year 13. The careful consideration given to breaking knowledge into steps supports pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) to achieve well. For all pupils, the deliberate re-visiting of earlier learning across the curriculum helps them to know and remember more over time. 8 and 9 May 2024

p.1

2

Teachers’ subject knowledge is secure. Across subjects, they use this to explain new ideas clearly and to highlight areas of knowledge that can potentially be confusing. This helps pupils to develop an accurate understanding. Learning activities support pupils to apply their knowledge and skills well. Staff draw on details within individual plans to adapt activities appropriately for pupils with SEND. Teachers mostly use questioning effectively. However, on occasion, this does not clearly identify how well all pupils understand. Assessments provide pupils with a clear picture of the progress they are making and help them to identify where they have knowledge gaps. Teachers use the outcomes of these assessments to re-teach aspects of knowledge that pupils have not securely understood.

p.2

2

Pupils’ enjoyment of reading is prioritised across the curriculum. They are engaged in regular reading of a diverse range of texts woven through the different subjects. The profile of reading is raised further by sixth-form students, who read with lower-school pupils. For individuals at the early stages of learning to read, there is bespoke support in place for them to quickly catch up.

p.2

2

While the school has clear expectations of pupils’ behaviour, some aspects are not consistently reinforced around the school. Across lessons, pupils work with focus, and there are few examples of low-level disruption. If this does occur, teachers address it quickly. They use the school’s clear behaviour steps consistently to re-focus pupils on their learning. However, around the school, there are some inconsistencies in how staff address lower-level behaviours, such as pupils wearing incorrect uniform items, or using mobile phones outside of permitted areas. This does not support all pupils to achieve the school’s high behaviour expectations. When pupils exhibit more challenging behaviour, consequences and support, such as behaviour plans, are put in place promptly. There is a similarly sharp approach to tracking pupils’ attendance, with effective actions being taken to reduce absences when needed.

p.2

2

The school’s approach to personal development is thoughtful and well considered. Through the ‘Learning for Life’ curriculum, pupils explore how they can manage the challenges and opportunities found in wider society. This is supplemented by the ‘Beliefs and Values’ curriculum, which develops pupils’ understanding of diversity. There are opportunities for pupils to contribute positively to the school and local community. ‘Student Voice’ provides them with increasing opportunities to share their views and contribute to changes in the school. Different leadership roles provide pupils across year groups with valuable experience of responsibility.

p.2

2

The school is focused on continual improvement. It has an accurate understanding of its strengths and areas where further work is needed. The nature of changes is carefully considered, a process which is supported by effective challenge from governors. Staff feel that the school listens to their views and values efforts to keep their workload manageable.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 8 and 9 May 2024

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some aspects of the school’s behaviour expectations are not consistently reinforced by staff. As a result, not all pupils are supported to see the importance of these, with some openly ignoring school rules such as uniform and mobile phone expectations around the buildings. The school needs to ensure that all its expectations of pupils’ conduct are consistently upheld by all staff.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in March 2015.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘ disadvantaged pupils ’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 8 and 9 May 2024

p.3

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,656

p.4

form

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.4

form

Date of previous inspection 10 January 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Mid Sussex Federation of Schools.  The school uses three registered alternative providers and one unregistered alternative provider.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 8 and 9 May 2024

p.4

5

 This was the first routine inspection since the Covid-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspectors met with the headteacher, deputy headteachers, assistant headteachers, subject leaders, community leaders and teachers. The lead inspector also met with governors, including the chair of the governing body, and spoke to the local authority’s school improvement adviser.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, geography, history and art. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The inspectors observed tutor time, break and lunchtime activities.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single

p.5

5

central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff, and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspectors considered the responses to the staff survey and spoke to a range of staff about their views of the school. They looked at the school’s self-evaluation documents and school improvement plan.  The inspectors took account of the responses to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire and the additional free-text responses.

p.5

Inspection team

Phillip Blagg, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Inspection team

Louise Walker His Majesty’s Inspector 8 and 9 May 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion