Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Daisychain Preschool
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
18 Jun 2024
- URN verified
2575771
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 362
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 24 and 28 May 2024, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. On 10 June 2024, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements and issued actions for the provider to take. Although not linked to the original concerns, we also found the provider had failed to notify Ofsted of a change to the person managing the provision, which is a requirement of their registration.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure the safeguarding policy includes clear information about how cameras and other electronic devices with imaging and sharing capabilities are used in the setting, as well as mobile phones
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that staff receive thorough induction training that includes information about safeguarding and child protection, so that they have an up to date knowledge of safeguarding issues
p.1
Summary of outcome
n comply with other legal duties, including food hygiene regulations to ensure the hygienic preparation of food for children.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 12 June 2024, the provider responded to the actions set. We found that the provider had updated the mobile phone policy and staff handbook to include information about how cameras and other electronic devices with imaging and sharing capabilities are used in the setting. The provider had ensured that use of the kitchen now complies with food hygiene regulations and staff had been booked onto safeguarding training. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this. The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion