Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Arno Vale Junior School
Summary
John Spragg (lead), Claire Stylianides
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 May 2024
- Inspectors verified
Claire Stylianides, John Spragg
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
NG5 4JF
- Name on report verified
Arno Vale Junior School
- URN verified
122509
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- When pupils need help to manage their emotions or regulate their behaviour, caring staff provide excellent support. p.2
- needs to make sure that there are consistently high expectations of pupils’ written work across all subjects. p.4
- Pupils at Arno Vale Junior School are kind, polite, and respectful. p.2
- In mathematics lessons, staff use their strong subject knowledge to explain and model concepts clearly. p.2
- Staff are happy and proud to work at this school. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As a result, gaps in knowledge and misconceptions are not always identified or addressed. p.3
- They do not always identify when pupils have gaps or misconceptions in their knowledge. p.3
- Sometimes they accept written work that is of poor quality without supporting pupils to improve their work or address mistakes. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language2
“They talk confidently about diversity, British values, and the protected characteristics.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,007
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Arno Vale Junior School Saville Road, Woodthorpe, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG5 4JF
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good 14–15 May 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils at Arno Vale Junior School are kind, polite, and respectful. In lessons, and around the school, they readily demonstrate the school’s values of determination, respect, independence, curiosity, and honesty. Pupils have mature attitudes. They talk confidently about diversity, British values, and the protected characteristics.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is calm and orderly. There are few disruptions to learning. At playtimes, pupils play and socialise together happily. When pupils need help to manage their emotions or regulate their behaviour, caring staff provide excellent support. Pupils say they feel safe in the school. They trust staff to help them when they are worried.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is ambitious for all pupils to achieve well. The curriculum is broad. It has been developed to support pupils to gain a depth of knowledge across the full range of subjects. The school has significantly strengthened the teaching of reading, writing and mathematics. As a result, pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), achieve well in these subjects. They are well prepared for their next stage in education. These changes to the curriculum are recent and did not have sufficient time to impact previous cohorts. Published outcomes do not reflect the achievement of current pupils.
p.2
better?
The school prioritises reading. Pupils read widely and often. In whole class reading lessons, pupils read from a range of challenging and interesting texts. These include stories, poetry, plays, and non-fiction. Texts are well chosen to broaden pupils’ understanding of different faiths and cultures. Staff help pupils to develop a rich vocabulary. The school identifies when pupils have gaps in their reading knowledge. Through phonics lessons and other well-planned support, these pupils catch up quickly.
p.2
better?
In mathematics lessons, staff use their strong subject knowledge to explain and model concepts clearly. They provide lots of time for pupils to practise what they have learned. Staff check learning systematically and address misconceptions quickly and skilfully. There are daily opportunities to revisit knowledge and make connections between topics. This helps pupils to remember what they have learned.
p.2
better?
The curriculum for writing identifies precisely the knowledge that pupils should learn. In writing lessons, activities focus sharply on this knowledge and help pupils develop fluency. Staff encourage pupils to check their own work carefully. They provide useful feedback so that pupils can edit their work and correct mistakes. However, in some other subjects, staff do not always have high enough expectations of pupils’ written work. They don’t always provide opportunities for pupils to practise writing. Sometimes pupils’ mistakes are not identified or corrected. 14–15 May 2024
p.2
3
In science and the foundation subjects, the curriculums are interesting and ambitious. For example, in art lessons, pupils study the work of artists from around the world. They use this as inspiration for their own artwork, using a range of materials and techniques. However, in some of these subjects, the school does not have routines for checking how well pupils remember what they have learned. As a result, gaps in knowledge and misconceptions are not always identified or addressed.
p.3
3
The school provides personalised support for pupils with SEND to access the same lessons as their peers. In lessons, staff regularly check pupils’ understanding. They prioritise pupils with SEND and break learning into manageable chunks and adapt lesson activities well when needed.
p.3
3
The curriculum for personal, social, and health education (PSHE) supports pupils’ personal development well. Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe and how to maintain good physical and mental health.
p.3
3
The school caters well for pupils’ wider personal development. There are clubs in sports, the arts, games and many other activities. Older pupils enthusiastically take on roles of responsibility, such as playground ambassadors. Pupils are proud to represent their school in different sporting competitions. All pupils have opportunities to go on trips and residential visits.
p.3
3
Staff are happy and proud to work at this school. They are enthusiastic about opportunities to develop their expertise. Staff appreciate the support they get to manage their workload. Parents and carers are positive about the school. They value the care that staff show to their children and the education the school provides.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some subjects, the school has not established routines for staff to check that pupils have learned what they have been taught. As a result, staff are not always clear about the progress that pupils are making in these subjects. They do not always identify when pupils have gaps or misconceptions in their knowledge. The school needs to make sure that the curriculum in all subjects precisely identifies what pupils will learn and supports staff to accurately check that pupils have gained knowledge securely. In some subjects, staff do not always have high enough expectations of the work that pupils complete. Sometimes they accept written work that is of poor quality without supporting pupils to improve their work or address mistakes. As a result, pupils do not always achieve as well as they might in all subjects. The school 14–15 May 2024
p.3
4
needs to make sure that there are consistently high expectations of pupils’ written work across all subjects.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 14–15 May 2024
p.4
School details
Local authority Nottinghamshire County Council
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date(s) of previous inspection 28 – 29 June 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school uses one registered alternative provider.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspector(s) carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgment about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, the SENDCo, and other school leaders. The lead inspector met with representatives of the governing body. The lead inspector spoke to a representative of the local authority. 14–15 May 2024
p.5
6
The lead inspector met with the chief executive officer of the White Hills Park multi-academy trust. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, science, and art. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector listened to some pupils read. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum, looked at samples of pupils’ work and spoke to pupils about their learning in some other subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspector: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors met with pupils from across the school, including some pupils with
p.6
6
SEND. Inspectors met with parents and considered responses to Ofsted Parentview. Inspectors met with a range of teaching and non-teaching staff to hear their views on the school. Inspectors also considered the views expressed in an online staff survey.
p.6
Inspection team
John Spragg, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Claire Stylianides His Majesty's Inspector 14–15 May 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion