Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Brockington College

Inspected 24 Apr 2024 · published 12 Jun 2024 · URN 138521

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Apr 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Gill Martin, John Morrison, John Spragg, Nik Patel, Ruth Hurcombe, Stuart Anderson

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    LE19 4AQ

  • Name on report verified

    Brockington College

  • URN verified

    138521

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−16Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiouswell plannedstrongeffectivehigh expectationspoliterespectfulsecure
Criticismnot alwaysstrugglenot consistentlygapspoortoo lowinconsistentweaker

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1121w−18
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve77w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,177
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
27%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Brockington College Blaby Road, Enderby, Leicester, Leicestershire LE19 4AQ

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The principal of this school is Sadie Batstone. This school is part of Embrace Multi Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Sharon Mullins, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Russell Andrews. 23–24 April 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils at Brockington College are polite and respectful. The school is calm and orderly. The Christian ethos and school values support pupils’ personal development well. There is a culture of mutual respect and tolerance. Pupils learn about different faiths and cultures. They understand, and respect, diversity.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The curriculum is broad and ambitious. However, it is not delivered consistently well. Sometimes the expectations of what pupils can achieve are too low. As a result, pupils do not always achieve as well as they could. This is reflected in the most recent published outcomes from external examinations. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not always receive effective support to access lessons.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Beyond the academic curriculum, pupils benefit from an ambitious enrichment programme. All pupils have the opportunity to take part in a range of memorable experiences and trips during their time at the school. These include visits to Iceland, Germany and New York, as well as interesting days out to places closer to home, such as Tate Modern and Warner Bros Studios. Pupils enthusiastically take on positions of responsibility in the school. For example, pupil leaders take an active role in promoting diversity and good mental health.

p.2

better?

Pupils in key stage 3 study a wide range of subjects that meet the requirements of the national curriculum. At key stage 4, pupils choose from a well-considered range of academic and vocational courses. All pupils have the opportunity to study the subjects that make up the English baccalaureate. However, few pupils choose to take a GCSE in modern foreign languages.

p.2

better?

In all subjects, the curriculum is well planned. The school has thought carefully about the important knowledge that pupils should learn. This is sequenced well so that complexity increases over time. Staff have strong subject knowledge. They plan learning activities that focus sharply on the knowledge they want pupils to learn.

p.2

better?

The delivery of the planned curriculum is inconsistent across the school. Some staff do not always check that pupils are secure in what they have learned previously. Gaps in prior knowledge are not always identified or addressed. When this happens, pupils cannot connect new knowledge to what they have learned before. In some lessons, staff do not routinely ask questions to identify how well pupils understand new concepts or vocabulary. Sometimes they move on too quickly. As a result, learning is insecure. Pupils do not always remember what they have learned. The work that they produce is not consistently of a high quality.

p.2

better?

The school has robust systems to identify the needs of pupils with SEND. However, strategies to support pupils with SEND to access the curriculum are not always implemented effectively. Some staff do not routinely adapt lessons to meet the 23–24 April 2024

p.2

3

needs of all pupils. Pupils, including those with SEND, sometimes struggle to engage fully with learning activities.

p.3

3

The curriculum provides many opportunities for pupils to read. This includes library lessons and shared reading in tutor time. The school provides support for weaker readers that helps them to develop reading fluency.

p.3

3

Most pupils attend school well. They behave well in lessons and around school. The school works effectively to support those that do not attend, or behave, as well as they should. Pastoral leaders, chaplains, and mentors provide strong support for pupils’ mental health when it is needed.

p.3

3

The curriculum for personal, social, health and careers education (PSHCE) is well planned and delivered by subject specialists. Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe and how to take care of their physical and mental health. PSHCE lessons, assemblies and tutor time activities support pupils spiritual and character development well. The careers programme includes opportunities to meet with employers and education providers. All pupils benefit from personalised careers advice.

p.3

3

The school has worked hard to develop a positive and aspirational culture. They have improved the way they engage, and communicate with, parents and carers. Leaders from the multi-academy trust, along with trustees and governors, know the school well. They share school leaders’ ambition to continue to improve all aspects of the school’s provision. Staff are happy and proud to work at the school. They value the support they get to manage their workload and develop their expertise.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some staff do not have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve. In some lessons, they do not always challenge pupils to think deeply. Work that is incomplete, or of poor quality, is too readily accepted. As a result, pupils do not achieve as well as they should. The school needs to ensure that all staff have high expectations for all pupils and support them to achieve well across the curriculum.  Routines for checking pupils’ understanding are not embedded in the curriculum. Some staff do not systematically check that pupils are secure in what they have learned previously. They do not always check how well pupils understand new knowledge or vocabulary. As a result, gaps and misconceptions are not always identified or addressed. Sometimes pupils struggle to make connections in their learning. They do not always learn securely and cannot always remember what 23–24 April 2024

p.3

4

they have learned. The school needs to make sure that all staff routinely check what pupils have learned and understood.  Some staff do not routinely adapt learning activities to meet the needs of all pupils. This includes pupils with SEND. Staff do not always use the information they receive about pupils with SEND to provide effective support in lessons. This means that some pupils, including those with SEND, struggle to engage fully with lessons. These pupils do not achieve as well as they could. The school needs to make sure that lessons meet the needs of all pupils and that pupils with SEND receive the support they need to achieve well.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 23–24 April 2024

p.4

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1200

p.5

School details

Date(s) of previous inspection 15 – 16 November 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of Embrace Multi Academy Trust.  This is a Church of England school. The most recent section 48 inspection took place in June 2023. This is an inspection of the school’s religious character.  The school uses two registered and nine unregistered alternative providers.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspector(s) carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 23–24 April 2024

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school's education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the principal, members of the senior leadership team, and other school leaders.  The lead inspector met with the chair of trustees, the chief executive officer, and the director of education from the multi-academy trust. The lead inspector also met with representatives of the local governing body, including the chair, and spoke to the director of education from the Diocese of Leicester.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, modern foreign languages, history, and design technology. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked

p.6

6

at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also visited lessons and looked at pupils’ work in some other subjects.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors met with pupils from a range of year groups including pupils with SEND.  Inspectors met with a range of teaching and non-teaching staff.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted Parent View, as well as online surveys for pupils and staff.

p.6

Inspection team

John Spragg, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Nik Patel Ofsted Inspector 23–24 April 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion