Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Rosecroft Primary School

Inspected 1 May 2024 · published 12 Jun 2024 · URN 120780

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Ashley Best-White (lead), Becky Quinn, Bryony Surtees

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 May 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Ashley Best-White, Becky Quinn, Bryony Surtees

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    NR17 1BE

  • Name on report verified

    Rosecroft Primary School

  • URN verified

    120780

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconfidentenjoyeffectivelyimprovingstrongambitiouspositivefeel safe
Criticismnot alwaysfall behindtoo slowgapsnot yetvariablenot consistentlynot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1183w+15
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve33w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,185
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
18%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Rosecroft Primary School London Road, Attleborough, Norfolk NR17 1BE

p.1

Inspection dates: 30 April and 1 May 2024

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 30 April and 1 May 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Rosecroft Primary School is a friendly, positive and inclusive environment. Pupils feel safe and speak positively about the staff who take care of them.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Expectations of pupils’ behaviour are improving. Some pupils behave well but there are some pupils whose behaviour disrupts the learning of others. There are some pupils who get extra support with their behaviour. This helps them to make the right choices. More recently, pupils are becoming confident that behaviour is getting better. Pupils say that bullying happens every now and then but that staff sort things out quickly when bullying does occur.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

As pupils move through the school, the curriculum is not always implemented consistently well. The quality of pupils’ learning varies across different curriculum subjects. Some staff do not use the school’s support plans for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There are many opportunities for pupils to develop their confidence and help them become more independent. Pupils enjoy the different residential trips, visitors and visits that the school plans for them. Pupils value the leadership roles they can have. These include positions such as prefects, heads of school, librarians and play leaders.

p.2

better?

There is a planned, appropriate curriculum in place for all subjects. In the core subjects of reading and mathematics, pupils learn step by step the knowledge they need to know. Trained staff deliver the curriculum in a clear, structured way. Teachers routinely check what pupils know.

p.2

better?

Foundation subjects are not always taught effectively. This contributes to pupils having gaps in their knowledge. Checks on pupils’ learning are not in place in some subjects. The subject leaders do not always have an accurate view of how well pupils learn in the subjects they lead. In addition, some subject leaders have not yet developed the skills to carry out their roles effectively.

p.2

better?

The school understands the importance of pupils learning to read fluently. Children in Nursery learn to listen and identify sounds ready to learn the formal phonics teaching in Reception. Pupils’ reading books are matched to the sounds they are learning. Pupils’ knowledge of phonics is checked regularly. However, some pupils who fall behind are not always supported to catch up quickly enough. This means these pupils do not learn to read as quickly as they should. Where pupils do have the ‘catch-up’ sessions, the interventions are often confidently delivered by knowledgeable staff and children make progress.

p.2

better?

Teachers adapt tasks to meet the needs of pupils with SEND. However, this is not always done precisely enough. The school is sometimes too slow to identify pupils 30 April and 1 May 2024

p.2

3

who need greater support to access the curriculum. Some support plans for pupils with SEND are not specific enough. Consequently, these pupils do not always gain the knowledge they need to achieve as well as they could. Over time, there has not been sufficient capacity for the leadership of SEND provision. This has increased and improved recently.

p.3

3

Children make a strong start to their education in early years. They become increasingly confident and play and work well together. They enjoy an ambitious curriculum that covers the different areas of learning. Staff choose tasks which encourage children to explore and be creative. This means that children learn to be curious and express themselves. Meaningful interactions between adults and children support language and communication development. Staff design tasks that develop children’s early mathematics skills effectively. Children are well prepared for their next stage in learning.

p.3

3

School leaders have prioritised improving behaviour. The school has a new behaviour policy which is starting to have an impact. Staff have received additional training. The school has put in place various individual plans to support pupils to behave and learn well. Staff, parents and pupils have mixed views about behaviour at the school. The school is focusing on getting this right. However, it is taking time for everyone to feel more confident about the actions for improvement and their impact on behaviour.

p.3

3

A well-structured personal development programme is in place. Pupils are being prepared well for life in modern Britain. They have an age-appropriate understanding of different cultures and beliefs and know how to stay safe online. Pupils feel valued and celebrate differences.

p.3

3

Governors are committed and supportive. Over time, the governing body has not held school leaders to account with enough urgency around school improvement priorities. Recently, governors have started to check on how well the school is doing. They are providing the required support and are asking challenging questions. This work is in its infancy.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school does not identify some pupils with SEND quickly enough or provide appropriate support. Some pupils’ targets are generic. They are not specific. This limits pupils’ achievement. The school should ensure that support for pupils with SEND accurately meets their specific needs so they can achieve well. 30 April and 1 May 2024

p.3

4

 Subject leaders are not making a consistent impact on the quality of provision in their subjects. This means that pupils have variable experiences of the curriculum. Subject leaders need appropriate training, support and time to monitor and improve provision. This will ensure that they have an accurate understanding of their subject, and they develop the skills they need to improve the areas they lead.  Some pupils, parents and staff are not confident in the changes taking place to secure better behaviour. The school should work closely with the school community to ensure there is a shared vision and understanding of the school’s chosen approach to managing pupils’ behaviour. The school needs to ensure that it continues to provide further training, guidance and support to ensure that everyone can contribute to improving behaviour.  The governing body has not held school leaders to account with enough rigour.

p.4

4

While governors are now starting to check how well the school is performing and ask questions to hold leaders to account, this has not been the case until very recently. This work is in the early stages of implementation. Governors must work with urgency to support and hold leaders to account to secure the key improvements required.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 30 April and 1 May 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 12 September 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Rosecroft Primary and Nursery School has a head of school. It federated with Attleborough Primary School in September 2021 and shares an executive headteacher and governing body.  The school runs wraparound care provision on the school site.  The school does not use alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with the head of school, the assistant headteachers, the 30 April and 1 May 2024

p.5

6

leader for SEND, the early years lead, subject leaders, staff, a local authority representative and members of the governing body.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, religious education, modern foreign languages and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector also listened to pupils read with a familiar member of staff.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors reviewed a range of documents, including behaviour logs, attendance

p.6

6

records, pupil records, minutes from governor meetings, school development plans and school self-evaluation documents.  Inspectors considered 77 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for parents and carers, Ofsted Parent View. This included 54 comments from parents in the free-text facility.  The 111 responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for pupils were considered. Inspectors also spoke with pupils throughout the inspection to gather their views.  Inspectors took into account the 44 responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for staff. Inspectors also met with staff throughout the inspection to gather their views.

p.6

Inspection team

Ashley Best-White, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Bryony Surtees Ofsted Inspector 30 April and 1 May 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion