Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Littledean Church of England Primary School
Summary
Lakmini Harkus (lead), Jack Lacey
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
1 May 2024
- Inspectors verified
Jack Lacey, Lakmini Harkus
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
GL14 3NL
- Name on report verified
Littledean Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
115631
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- A lack of consistent expectations and rigour mean that it is unclear whether pupils have grasped their learning. p.3
- Assessment is not yet effective in identifying gaps in knowledge. p.2
- However, the shortcomings in curriculum design and implementation are also having an impact on pupils with SEND. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, in some other subjects, because the important knowledge has not been carefully sequenced from the early years, learning activities do not always precisely match the knowledge pupils need to learn. p.2
- The school should ensure that staff are supported to assess and respond to gaps in pupils’ knowledge. p.4
- This means some pupils are far behind where they should be. p.3
- In some subjects, the school has not identified the most important knowledge pupils need to learn, starting in the early years. p.3
- The school must decide on the precise knowledge pupils need to grasp at each stage of their education so they know and remember more over time. 30 April and 1 May 2024 p.3
- Overall, pupils know the school values well and how these should guide their behaviour. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics8
“Leaders have placed importance on developing a love for reading.” p.3Teaching & assessment6
“Assessment is not yet effective in identifying gaps in knowledge.” p.2Leadership & governance6
“Leaders have placed importance on developing a love for reading.” p.3Personal development3
“The school’s work on pupils’ personal development is of a high quality.” p.2Wellbeing & mental health2
“The headteacher has skilfully balanced school improvement priorities with staff’s well-being.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,108
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Littledean Church of England Primary School Church Street, Littledean, Cinderford, Gloucestershire GL14 3NL
p.1
Inspection dates: 30 April and 1 May 2024
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 30 April and 1 May 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders have rightly focused on developing the curriculum since the previous inspection. However, many of these improvements are in the early stages. Because of this, there are inconsistencies in how well the curriculum is designed and taught. As a result, pupils do not remember their learning well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s overarching value of love is brought to life through the school’s caring and inclusive environment. Pupils are polite and courteous. They feel well cared for by staff and know whom to go to for help. This helps them feel safe.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils know how to behave during lessons and at social times. Overall, pupils know the school values well and how these should guide their behaviour. Where some minor disruption can occur, this is due to variability in how the curriculum is taught.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s work on pupils’ personal development is of a high quality. Pupils reflect on religious stories and how these may have ended differently in varying circumstances. They then express a response to this activity in their own way, for example through artwork or poetry. Pupils benefit from a variety of visits, such as from authors and a Paralympian. Pupils place importance on supporting local charities, such as The Salvation Army.
p.2
better?
Leaders have prioritised the essential actions needed to secure important improvements. They have evaluated the curriculum and taken decisive action. For example, they decided to adopt a new history curriculum. This is beginning to have a positive impact. For example, pupils remember recent learning on comparing primary and secondary sources. However, this work is in its infancy.
p.2
better?
The early years curriculum is planned with carefully sequenced knowledge. The learning environment is well considered, with ‘under the sea’ activities. In Reception Year, children develop fine motor skills well through scissor work. In Nursery, children have sustained concentration and demonstrate a strong knowledge of numbers to 5. However, there is a disconnect between learning in the early years and the rest of the school. In some subjects, the school has not carefully sequenced the knowledge it expects pupils to learn from early years. This means pupils do not build on previous learning and remember their learning.
p.2
better?
In reading comprehension, learning activities are carefully designed. This helps pupils consider authors’ choices of words and phrases. However, in some other subjects, because the important knowledge has not been carefully sequenced from the early years, learning activities do not always precisely match the knowledge pupils need to learn. Assessment is not yet effective in identifying gaps in knowledge. As a result, misconceptions can go unaddressed, and so pupils do not remember their learning well in these subjects. 30 April and 1 May 2024
p.2
3
Leaders have placed importance on developing a love for reading. Pupil librarians make book recommendations in the school’s newsletter and ‘book buddies’ share books together. The school has ensured all staff have been trained to teach phonics. This is implemented with varying success. In Nursery, children benefit from ‘blend from the box’ sessions to develop their communication and language. However, as children develop their understanding of reading, the teaching of phonics is less secure. A lack of consistent expectations and rigour mean that it is unclear whether pupils have grasped their learning. Although interventions to support those pupils who are behind are planned, these do not always happen. This means some pupils are far behind where they should be.
p.3
3
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have detailed learning plans with precise and measurable targets. However, the shortcomings in curriculum design and implementation are also having an impact on pupils with SEND. Along with other pupils, these pupils do not develop detailed knowledge across the curriculum as well as they could.
p.3
3
The school’s mental health support is highly valued by pupils. This helps them feel ready to learn. Leaders and governors are meticulous in their analysis of the rate of pupils’ attendance. Although this is not yet at national levels, it is a rapidly improving picture.
p.3
3
The school provides a comprehensive personal development programme. This includes teaching pupils how to stay safe. Pupils develop a sense of moral purpose, for example through joining the carbon footprints group. This group encourages care for the environment. Pupils appreciate interesting experiences such as visits to the pantomime and the curling and lacrosse clubs.
p.3
3
The headteacher has skilfully balanced school improvement priorities with staff’s well-being. Consequently, staff are proud to work here. Governors know the school’s strengths and areas to develop. They are in full support of the continued work needed to secure improvement at the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some subjects, the school has not identified the most important knowledge pupils need to learn, starting in the early years. This means teaching does not help pupils build their knowledge securely. The school must decide on the precise knowledge pupils need to grasp at each stage of their education so they know and remember more over time. 30 April and 1 May 2024
p.3
4
Learning activities do not always build on what pupils know and can do. This is because gaps in pupils’ knowledge are not identified and so pupils cannot remember their learning. The school should ensure that staff are supported to assess and respond to gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Oversight of how well the curriculum is being implemented across subjects is at an early stage, including in early reading. As a result, the school is not clear how well pupils are learning the intended curriculum. The school should evaluate the curriculum by considering how well pupils are learning, including when learning to read, so it can make improvements where needed.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 30 April and 1 May 2024
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Chair of governing body Michael Barnsley
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 9 November 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is designated as having a religious character. The school is part of the Diocese of Gloucester. At the most recent section 48 inspection of the school, carried out in October 2022, the school was judged to be good. The school operates its own nursery provision for three- and four-year-olds. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the headteacher, school staff, parents, pupils, governors and a representative from the local authority. 30 April and 1 May 2024
p.5
6
Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector listened to pupils from Years 1, 2 and 3 read to a known adult. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school, including at lunchtime and breaktimes. In addition, the inspectors met with pupils formally and informally to hear their views. Inspectors considered responses to the online survey, Ofsted Parent View,
p.6
Inspection team
Lakmini Harkus, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Jack Lacey Ofsted Inspector 30 April and 1 May 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion